Is Joe the next Jimmy Carter ??

[highfigh]

Better than drumphy's absolute lack of infrastructure being addressed....

How much attention did Obama pay to infrastructure? Not very damned much and the cost would have been much lower when he was in office. The tax increases will definitely be painful but, well, with so many hating people who have more, who cares, right? The income levels that will be affected are dipping farther and farther into the middle class, albeit upper middle class, but it's not just the $1million+ earners who are going to be hit.

Everyone wants to blame the last guy, but at some point, people need to see the long view and admit that neither side has done what they should and that falls directly on the head of Congress, not just a POTUS. While Congress has been wagging their collective finger in our faces, they have done far too much harm to the country and now, they're spending like drunken sailors on shore leave for the first time in ten years.

 

[Mikado463]

How much attention did Obama pay to infrastructure? Not very damned much and the cost would have been much lower when he was in office. The tax increases will definitely be painful but, well, with so many hating people who have more, who cares, right? The income levels that will be affected are dipping farther and farther into the middle class, albeit upper middle class, but it's not just the $1million+ earners who are going to be hit.

Everyone wants to blame the last guy, but at some point, people need to see the long view and admit that neither side has done what they should and that falls directly on the head of Congress, not just a POTUS. While Congress has been wagging their collective finger in our faces, they have done far too much harm to the country and now, they're spending like drunken sailors on shore leave for the first time in ten years.

Agreed but for some reason on this forum you have an inordinate amount of kiss ass liberals that refuse to take off their blinders !

 

[adk highlander]

And so called conservatives who cannot get the head out of tRumps ass. You say we have "blinders" when all we hear are proven outright lies from the right but you just keep on trucking and defend them. I wonder if this inordinate amount you say is because we are the majority. You on the right are done nothing but BLOCK the agenda of Obama and now Biden. Nothing got done during tRumps era other than more destabilization of our society. He had the ability to pass new legislation but could not come up with anything good because the only thing they are good at is stopping and demonizing the other party.

 

[Mikado463]

And so called conservatives who cannot get the head out of tRumps ass.

yep, there are plenty of them as well, but YOU can't show once where I was on that bandwagon !

You say we have "blinders" when all we hear are proven outright lies from the right but you just keep on trucking and defend them.

LMAO !!! now you're being funny !! How the hell can any NY'er make a statement such as that with a Governor like Cuomo ?? !!

I wonder if this inordinate amount you say is because we are the majority.

I suppose it will stay that way so long as the Gov't hand outs continue ........

You on the right

see, there YOU go again......... nowhere in my post did I single out YOU. Am I right of center, yes, but no where near what you believe. ADK, if you read earlier posts of mine you would have seen that I truly believe both extremes are total POS, perhaps the far right being more so.

 

[adk highlander]

yep, there are plenty of them as well, but YOU can't show once where I was on that bandwagon !

I don't believe I said you were one but calling folks here kiss ass liberals with their blinders on makes one wonder. Who or what makes someone a kiss ass liberal. Not agreeing with you?

LMAO !!! now you're being funny !! How the hell can any NY'er make a statement such as that with a Governor like Cuomo ?? !!

So here you are bringing in Cuomo because I said the right is blind to tRumps lies (who you say you don't support) and I don't see anywhere that the dems are huddling around Cuomo to protect him from anything wrong he has done. He will get what he deserves.

I suppose it will stay that way so long as the Gov't hand outs continue ........

Umm no. The popular vote has went to Dems in all the recent elections. The only hope the republican's have is keeping the electoral college in place.

see, there YOU go again......... nowhere in my post did I single out YOU. Am I right of center, yes, but no where near what you believe. ADK, if you read earlier posts of mine you would have seen that I truly believe both extremes are total POS, perhaps the far right being more so.

If you are on the right then you fit being You (meaning those). Folks have to understand that right now the voice of the republican party is tRump. Look what has happened to those few brave enough to disagree. Here I speak of Cheney, Romney, et al. If you spoke of them and what they are doing as a valid point against Biden's or tRump then maybe there would not be confusion into which camp you sit.

 

[Trell]

yep, there are plenty of them as well, but YOU can't show once where I was on that bandwagon !

We all know you are Never-Trumper as was clearly demonstrated, with gusto, in the various Trump threads. Or the failed coup and storming of the Capitol.

 

[Dude#1279435]

The problem isn't handouts during Covid. It is the amount of the handouts. I'm not a fan of changing the filibuster as that would give too much power with a simple 51%. Nor do I have a problem with in particular repubs blocking stuff that is wasteful spending. I'm also not sold on giving up the electoral for popular. I'm wondering if that won't make it a less state-driven race. Voter confidence? Pretty iffy.

All the dems do is talk about Trump.
I LOL at statements like this because the repubs haven't done a whole lot to.separate themselves from him.

 

[Mikado463]

The problem isn't handouts during Covid. It is the amount of the handouts. I'm not a fan of changing the filibuster as that would give too much power with a simple 51%. Nor do I have a problem with in particular repubs blocking stuff that is wasteful spending. I'm also not sold on giving up the electoral for popular. I'm wondering if that won't make it a less state-driven race. Voter confidence? Pretty iffy.

interesting on the 'popular vote', I wonder if you took away the major cities of the five most populated states where that number would fall ? Certainly in NY state if NYC is eliminated it would be a close race and look what Pa did in 2016. Regardless, as a life long registered Republican I have voted Democrat in numerous elections, local, state and federal.

All the dems do is talk about Trump.

I LOL at statements like this because the repubs haven't done a whole lot to.separate themselves from him.

Now don't be like ADK and lump all republicans into that circle, for my group(mostly self-employed business men and tradesmen) are NOT supportive of the 'Donald Doctrine'.

 

[Dude#1279435]

interesting on the 'popular vote', I wonder if you took away the major cities of the five most populated states where that number would fall ? Certainly in NY state if NYC is eliminated it would be a close race and look what Pa did in 2016. Regardless, as a life long registered Republican I have voted Democrat in numerous elections, local, state and federal.



Now don't be like ADK and lump all republicans into that circle, for my group(mostly self-employed business men and tradesmen) are NOT supportive of the 'Donald Doctrine'.

Aside from removing Chaney, I haven't heard from them.

 

[Trell]

Now don't be like ADK and lump all republicans into that circle, for my group(mostly self-employed business men and tradesmen) are NOT supportive of the 'Donald Doctrine'.

Hamlet:

>>>
HAMLET
Madam, how like you this play?

GERTRUDE
The lady protests too much, methinks.

HAMLET
Oh, but she’ll keep her word.

CLAUDIUS
Have you heard the argument? Is there no offense in ’t?

HAMLET
No, no, they do but jest. Poison in jest. No offense i' th' world.
<<<

 

[adk highlander]

Now don't be like ADK and lump all republicans into that circle, for my group(mostly self-employed business men and tradesmen) are NOT supportive of the 'Donald Doctrine'.

Or be like Mik and put all Democrats in with the kiss ass liberals.

 

[Mikado463]

Hamlet:

>>>


GERTRUDE
The lady protests too much, methinks.

HEATHCLIFFE

May God bless........

 

[lovinthehd]

How much attention did Obama pay to infrastructure? Not very damned much and the cost would have been much lower when he was in office. The tax increases will definitely be painful but, well, with so many hating people who have more, who cares, right? The income levels that will be affected are dipping farther and farther into the middle class, albeit upper middle class, but it's not just the $1million+ earners who are going to be hit.

Everyone wants to blame the last guy, but at some point, people need to see the long view and admit that neither side has done what they should and that falls directly on the head of Congress, not just a POTUS. While Congress has been wagging their collective finger in our faces, they have done far too much harm to the country and now, they're spending like drunken sailors on shore leave for the first time in ten years.

What has Obama and the do nothing repubs at the time have to do with it?

 

[lovinthehd]

Agreed but for some reason on this forum you have an inordinate amount of kiss ass liberals that refuse to take off their blinders !

Or some knuckle dragging old white guys without much clue like yourself?

 

[highfigh]

What has Obama and the do nothing repubs at the time have to do with it?

Biden is acting as if everything needs to be done as soon as possible, at any cost and every effing time someone is added, moved or appointed to a position, it's called 'historic' because it makes people feel good, amazes and thrills them. He & Congress need to GET THE JOB DONE BUT CUT OUT THE BULLSHYTE!

Obviously, no President can get much done if they don't have a willing Congress, but this time, the House is using 'reconciliation' to change the game. That's dangerous. They need to adhere to Article 1 of the Constitution and they aren't.

 

[Dude#1279435]

Biden is acting as if everything needs to be done as soon as possible, at any cost and every effing time someone is added, moved or appointed to a position, it's called 'historic' because it makes people feel good, amazes and thrills them. He & Congress need to GET THE JOB DONE BUT CUT OUT THE BULLSHYTE!

Yeah that's power. They control everything. They can shove through what they want. They also get the responsibility of their spending as did the Republicans for losing everything under Trump.

Obviously, no President can get much done if they don't have a willing Congress, but this time, the House is using 'reconciliation' to change the game. That's dangerous. They need to adhere to Article 1 of the Constitution and they aren't.

Hmmm.....

What is reconciliation in Congress?

www.brookings.edu

Since its first use in 1980, reconciliation has been used to enact 22 bills as of April 2021 (four others were passed but vetoed by the president), including such significant pieces of legislation as major deficit reduction bills in the 1980s and 1990s, welfare reform in 1996, the Bush tax cuts in 2001 and 2003, the Trump tax cuts in 2017, and the American Rescue Plan under Joe Biden. It also played a big role in shaping the Affordable Care Act in 2010. Republicans tried and failed to use reconciliation to repeal large parts of the Affordable Care Act in 2016 and 2017. President Obama vetoed the 2016 attempt; the “no” votes of three Republican senators blocked the 2017 effort.

 

[highfigh]

Yeah that's power. They control everything. They can shove through what they want. They also get the responsibility of their spending as did the Republicans for losing everything under Trump.



Hmmm.....

What is reconciliation in Congress?

www.brookings.edu

Since its first use in 1980, reconciliation has been used to enact 22 bills as of April 2021 (four others were passed but vetoed by the president), including such significant pieces of legislation as major deficit reduction bills in the 1980s and 1990s, welfare reform in 1996, the Bush tax cuts in 2001 and 2003, the Trump tax cuts in 2017, and the American Rescue Plan under Joe Biden. It also played a big role in shaping the Affordable Care Act in 2010. Republicans tried and failed to use reconciliation to repeal large parts of the Affordable Care Act in 2016 and 2017. President Obama vetoed the 2016 attempt; the “no” votes of three Republican senators blocked the 2017 effort.

I'll have to find it, but Biden recently said "I control this" when asked about some legislation, but I don't remember the title of the video. I'll try to find it.

The thing I don't like about using reconciliation for some of the most recent legislation is that it forces taxpayers to pay for excessive spending. They're giving away the farm and it won't go well for future generations, if there will be anyone working.

 

[Danzilla31]

Some interesting points here.

I'm not too sure the last election means the popular vote will stay with democrats

The vote was largely based on voting against Trump and a lot of conservatives swung in that direction. A lot did vote against Trump. He really dropped the ball on Covid. Total clusterf$ck then he screwed the Senate with his disastrous fake election and gaslighting the capital.

I think 2022 and 2024 will tell us a lot more where things really stand.

Although if Trump runs again the party stays divided and Democrats have a huge advantage

But as mentioned above they are pushing a LOT of spending and pushing a lot of new ideas very fast and very hard so that puts out intangibles that make it a little harder to predict how people will react in the long term

Very very interesting times

 

[Dude#1279435]

I'll have to find it, but Biden recently said "I control this" when asked about some legislation, but I don't remember the title of the video. I'll try to find it.

The thing I don't like about using reconciliation for some of the most recent legislation is that it forces taxpayers to pay for excessive spending. They're giving away the farm and it won't go well for future generations, if there will be anyone working.

Well the Vice President is the decider on a 50/50 split. The President then signs the bill. My point is reconciliation is useful to you when you agree with it but complain about it when not. Add in Trump losing everything and it's kinda like crying over your own spilled milk.

 

[highfigh]

What has Obama and the do nothing repubs at the time have to do with it?

The amount of work needed to get this country up to speed WRT some technologies, roads/bridges, etc could have been spread out over a couple of decades and it would have cost far less but now, with so many people needing extensive training for simple jobs, that will cost many times what it should. Sure, SOME people can be re-trained, but that assumes they have any work skills in the first place. Right now, people don't want to work unless they have already been working through COVID- the Milwaukee Buck have found that with the need for people to work during the playoffs and they can't find people in Milwaukee who either can or are willing, so they're busing people in from other states. Also, people now think that because they work fast food jobs, they should automatically make $15/hr but they don't know that many skilled jobs don't pay much more than that. However, that shows the fact that many skilled jobs don't pay enough.

The cost of living in the US has risen too far, too fast and it has become almost impossible for many people to keep up, so that leads us to roughly half of the adults not paying ANY income tax. People skewered Romney for saying it, but his only mistake WRT his election campaign was in actually letting someone record it because it was true (he actually said 47%). We have people dropping out of school, chronic truancy, bad reading/math/science performance and Congress lets someone push Common Core through when the previously-used math teaching was effective and a helluva lot more efficient. This country has serious problems and it's more apparent in people who were born here, who say "I can't", when people who come here for opportunities that would never be theirs come and think "Look at all of the possibilities!".

Obama didn't get it done, Bush didn't get it done, Congress (both sides of the aisle) didn't get it done and this is a disgrace. They want to tell us how it will be, but the general public has forgotten that our government is supposed to work for us and operate with our permission, not the other way around. That's the reason I mentioned Article 1.