I'm sorry for such a newbie question, I just haven't purchased a universal player yet and I'm having doubts. Let me explain:
In my business (video production) I pay dearly to upgrade everything constantly. Having just purchased a Denon 3805 receiver, I was able to justify the purchase by thinking I'll get quite a few years out of it. The plan was/is to purchase Denon's forthcoming 3910 Universal Player to mate with the receiver via Denon Link.
Now, I'm losing confidence that the player makes sense. Hi-Def DVD formats are definitely on the horizon and though the future players will be backwards compatible, none of the current ones are forward compatible! Does it make sense to spend around a grand for a player that might not be very "current" at all in only two years?
This long tirade aside, let me get to the point that matters for this particular "Music Forum":
Having never heard an SACD or DVD-Audio disc side by side with a "traditional" CD, how much better are they? A little bit, moderately, or "blows your socks off with the dynamics and sense of realism"? My only experience has been at a Circuit City quite a few months ago where they had a little display on an end-cap with some small speakers in front and behind your head. If the idea was to demo the sonic quality of SACDs in the center of the noisy store, it, not surprisingly, fell flat in it's goal! I've never even read a magazine article that pitted a direct comparison between the new discs and their older brethren. I should mention that 2-channel sock-blowing is more important to me than asking my small surround speakers to carry a Keith Moon solo so I can feel like I'm on stage!
How many people have done actual disc-to-disc comparisons, and is the aural difference of these audio discs worth a $1,000 player if I'm unsure of justifying the player for video formats?
TIA-
M