So if you can't actually listen to the speakers before you buy, identifying this group with "wide support" can be helpful.
And it's still too wide.
The difficult part is defining your very specific goal or need. It's not just about great accurate reference sound and convincing image and soundstage. That might be the EASY part.
I think the difficult part may be the bass, placement, aesthetic, WAF, pride of ownership and cost.
If you know the dealer and you are willing to get b-stock that looks like new, you could get the Revel Salon2 or KEF 207/2 for $10K or less.
During my buying spree
![Big Grin :D :D]()
, I could have bought a brand new pair of KEF 207/2 for $10K. How do you decide between the Salon2 vs 207/2? The bass of the Salon2 goes deeper than the 207/2. But it's not enough that I wouldn't need subwoofers in my room. If I had the RBH SX-8300/R I wouldn't need subwoofers because each SX-8300/R has about the equivalent of 1 SX-1010 subwoofer and each SX-8300/R can be active bi-amp with LFE just like the SX-1010 subwoofer. Is the beryllium tweeter of the Salon2 really better sounding than the Titanium concentric tweeter of the 207/2 or the Scan-Speak 9500 tweeter of the SX-8300/R? Diminishing returns? Some people will prefer one over the other for various reasons.
But the Salon2 may have much better aesthetic and pride of ownership, yeah? Everyone knows the Revel Salon2. Speaker of the Year on Stereophile and Soundstage magazines. Many praises for sure.
Going from Aperion status to Revel Salon2 status or KEF 207/2 status seems pretty good. Looking up! I prefer the RBH Status myself ---- The Status Acoustics 8T that is. But that's not happening.
The point is, even if you "narrow" your search down to the great sounding speakers based on measurements or any other factors, there will still be too many speakers.
![Big Grin :D :D]()