High Efficient/Sensitive speakers

Matt34

Matt34

Moderator
Unless you have a screen to hide the last two speakers behind....no thanks.
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
Seems like they would be pretty good if you had matching JBL screen array/cinema type speakers as fronts for a dedicated theater. Not sure I'd want them in my living room though...
You don't think the on-axis & off-axis frequency responses are good enough for front speakers? I thought the graphs looked pretty good.

Download the SPEC SHEET.
 
T

templemaners

Senior Audioholic
You don't think the on-axis & off-axis frequency responses are good enough for front speakers? I thought the graphs looked pretty good.

Download the SPEC SHEET.
On/off axis looks pretty good horizontally, though the vertical off axis breaks up pretty good 1K-3K.

I think the bigger issue is how to mount these properly as L/R's with that 20 degree front baffle tilt (unless you want to mount them up high, pointing down to your listening position). You would need some sort of custom mounting solution to get it flat, but then you'd have to worry about the crossover not working as well without the baffle tilt.

They are designed to be surrounds, and I don't think it would be worth it to monkey around with them to repurpose them as fronts.

Plus, I'd still rather have the LSR 6332's :D
 
T

templemaners

Senior Audioholic
Okay, what about the JBL CBT 70J?

Narrow Music Mode: 126dB Peak SPL
Broad Music Mode: 125dB Peak SPL


:eek: :confused:

ehhhh.... I'm not quite sure what to make of those. They look huge, but according to the documents, it's 27.4" x 6.7" x 9.3" HWD. And, I found this part of the spec sheet interesting:

It is ideal for applications such as performance auditoriums, lecture halls, classrooms, A/V, transit centers, school stadiums, multipurpose spaces, racetracks, theme parks, and fill applications, among many others.

So, where you planning to put those ADTG? Theme park, performance auditorium, or racetrack? :D ;)
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
:eek: :confused:

ehhhh.... I'm not quite sure what to make of those. They look huge, but according to the documents, it's 27.4" x 6.7" x 9.3" HWD. And, I found this part of the spec sheet interesting:

It is ideal for applications such as performance auditoriums, lecture halls, classrooms, A/V, transit centers, school stadiums, multipurpose spaces, racetracks, theme parks, and fill applications, among many others.

So, where you planning to put those ADTG? Theme park, performance auditorium, or racetrack? :D ;)
Well, Don Keele's CBT design (Parts Express) and few other CBT were talked a lot about here & AVS. I didn't realize they were high efficiency speakers. Just curious. :D
 
GranteedEV

GranteedEV

Audioholic Ninja
Well, Don Keele's CBT design (Parts Express) and few other CBT were talked a lot about here & AVS. I didn't realize they were high efficiency speakers. Just curious. :D
They're 93db in the midrange, and being a line source they fall off at 3db for every doubling of distance instead of 6db/doubling of distance. I would say they are rather efficient speakers, except in the high treble where power demands are low.

Horns, they are not. Their horizontal dispersion is probably as wide or wider than the philharmonics and salon2s.
 
T

templemaners

Senior Audioholic
Yeah, gotta be horn or nothing.
Do ribbon horns count as "horns" or do they count as "ribbons"? :D
I think they would count as both, seeing as they have both "ribbon" and "horns" in the name. :D :p

A ribbon mounted in a waveguide would be interesting though... :cool:
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
I think they would count as both, seeing as they have both "ribbon" and "horns" in the name. :D :p

A ribbon mounted in a waveguide would be interesting though... :cool:
For some reasons, I always thought "horns" were compression driver horns.

I guess CD horns have more SPL whereas ribbon horns have more details / resolution?
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
ADTG, mind if a hijack your thread?

I'm considering these for surrounds;

https://www.chasehometheater.com/index.php?page=shop.product_details&flypage=flypage.tpl&product_id=576&category_id=28&option=com_virtuemart&Itemid=141&redirected=1&Itemid=141

to replace the PSB Alpha's 1's I'm using now. Any thoughts?
Some people think the $395 SHO-10 sounds as good as the $3,000 GedLee Abbey. Well, they say "90%" of the Abbey. :D

And that makes the SHO-10 extremely attractive! So I would get the SHO-10. Although, I think they may be too good for just surrounds.

I'm thinking the SHO-10 may sound so good, you may end up making them your mains and get 3 more for identical SHO-10 x 5. :D

It's like having 5 Abbey speakers all around. :D
 
psbfan9

psbfan9

Audioholic Samurai
Some people think the $395 SHO-10 sounds as good as the $3,000 GedLee Abbey. Well, they say "90%" of the Abbey. :D

Although, I think they may be too good for just surrounds.

I'm thinking the SHO-10 may sound so good, you may end up making them your mains and get 3 more for identical SHO-10 x 5. :D

It's like having 5 Abbey speakers all around. :D
This is why I was asking for thoughts. I wondered if they were too good to be used only as surrounds.
For my current situation I need towers.

Based on what I've read, saying these are as good as the Abbeys is really saying something.
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
Based on what I've read, saying these are as good as the Abbeys is really saying something.
When I read that about the GedLee Abbey, I almost bought the SHO-10 just for that!

I don't know. I may just buy them to try out. :D
 
Matt34

Matt34

Moderator
Thought of the day:

Don't believe everything you read on the interwebs....
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top