I think it was just zoomed in because now I see 30.0 kHz.
I feel the blue line looks better than the green no? Next is how do I go about making it better? for example, how do I located the areas in the room that need fixing?
View attachment 25158
So I just put some panels on the walls and played around and I think this is the best result that I got.. Seems like there is an issue at 40 60 and 80 khz... how does this graph look? Is there anything I can do about all those squiggles in the higher frequencies?
View attachment 25161
I took the diamonds off the wall and I was right that they didn't do anything. I mounted the bass trap and got a touch better but still need help locating the problems... any idea how to fix the spots around 40 60 and 100 Hz?
View attachment 25172
Honestly that response is very good below 200hz. Unless the bass sounds bad I'd leave it alone. The HF squiggles are simply an artifact of room reflections, if you compare the graphs before and after you added the panels, you'll notice the variation is less extreme due to a reduction in the reflections. The in room response you have is nearly perfect.
Typically, you won't see a major benefit on a FR graph with mid and high frequency acoustic panel placement, but you will hear one. Depending on the room, speakers, and the placement, reflections can benefit or worsen the sound, particularly the imaging. You might just have to experiment and see whether or not it sounds better or worse to you with the treatments. For movies, I personally think reflections hamper the imaging and prefer a strong direct sound field. For stereo music, reflections help make up for the shortcomings of having only two speakers. Usually, it's a compromise. Too much treatment will make the room feel unnaturally dead, while a very reflective room may smear imaging, discrete impulse sounds, and worsen dialogue intelligibility.
Sent from my LGMP260 using Tapatalk