H
highfigh
Seriously, I have no life.
I think we need T-shirts and hats- DEATH TO HDMI!!!!!!!!!!Yes, a real connector with normal wiring.... Kill HDMI with their Cr@ppy connectors and bring on this new format quicker.
I think we need T-shirts and hats- DEATH TO HDMI!!!!!!!!!!Yes, a real connector with normal wiring.... Kill HDMI with their Cr@ppy connectors and bring on this new format quicker.
It is, there are multiple pairs in that cable. (as you know)I thought it said everything is carried on one Cat5e/Cat6 cable.
How about using HDT - Pronounced "High Dot"The tech looks great, but they need a better name. If history has proven anything, a lot of a product's success is determined by the name. HDMI is easily remembered, HDbaseT is not.
I guess we need to wait unitl they describe the pin-out before passing judgment. Having spent a long time dealing with 12VDC audio systems, I know long runs with DC aren't likely to work best and if they want to use one Cat5e/Cat6 cable for everything, high voltage is an impossibility because of code restrictions and because of the likelihood of inductive coupling.It is, there are multiple pairs in that cable. (as you know)
This has been in the works for a while;(going back more than 4 years ago) I remember commercial electrical plans that always had tons of Cat5/Cat6 cable pulled and left in the walls for future use.
It makes perfect sense when the people behind it devised it for keeping others from copying the content. Their error, which appears to be major, is that for every method of keeping someone from copying something electronically, a way to go around it for the purposes of testing. That means someone is gonna talk. People can't keep their mouths shut and it's only a matter of time before everyone has it.This sounds fantastic I cant stand hdmi and the whole standard made zero since.
H-D-M-IHow about using HDT - Pronounced "High Dot"
Good enough is the first curse of mankind!The killer protocol must play over wireless connections. Commodity wireless routers, hubs and adapters will support the winning protocol. They could also supply power if that is part of the winning protocol. None of the wireless suppliers (e.g., Cisco/Linksys, Netgear, ...) were part of the announcement. This is necessary for the "next generation home networking." Its doubtful consumers will support two home networks. I wonder if wireless suppliers are working on an alterantive next generation. They too are aware of this this market opportunity. I doubt HDBaseT's wiring and superior fidelity can beat a commodity wireless capability that is good enough.
Apple. Orange. I have no doubt wireless will come into play, but for now this is a wired solution and it's going to be VERY easy to manufacture switches. Compatibility seems inevitable to some degree, and I wouldn't base anything on the presence of three founding members. New companies will come on board now that the spec is finalized and the papers are filed. They quite literally COULDN'T come on board earlier (there was nothing to come on board to).The killer protocol must play over wireless connections. Commodity wireless routers, hubs and adapters will support the winning protocol. They could also supply power if that is part of the winning protocol. None of the wireless suppliers (e.g., Cisco/Linksys, Netgear, ...) were part of the announcement. This is necessary for the "next generation home networking." Its doubtful consumers will support two home networks. I wonder if wireless suppliers are working on an alterantive next generation. They too are aware of this this market opportunity. I doubt HDBaseT's wiring and superior fidelity can beat a commodity wireless capability that is good enough.
Yeah, good luck with that. WiFi is only 54MB/sec (802.11G) and 802.11n is only about 160MB/sec. I doubt 20GB/sec will be here in 3 years.Let me know when you find a wireless solution capable of 20Gbit/sec.![]()
Just to be clear here, that is 54Mb/second. That's megabits, not bytes. 54Mb/second is 6.75MB/second. I'm lucky if I get 3MB/s transfer rate over my 802.11G network.Yeah, good luck with that. WiFi is only 54MB/sec (802.11G) and 802.11n is only about 160MB/sec. I doubt 20GB/sec will be here in 3 years.
I think I can arrange that.I think we need T-shirts and hats- DEATH TO HDMI!!!!!!!!!!
I was posting 'Best-case' specs. 20GB would be great, though.Just to be clear here, that is 54Mb/second. That's megabits, not bytes. 54Mb/second is 6.75MB/second. I'm lucky if I get 3MB/s transfer rate over my 802.11G network.
I can transfer at 85MB/second+ over my wired Gigabit network.
Now, 20Gb, that is is 2.5GB/second. That is an entire 50GB Blu-Ray disc in 20 seconds!
Standard Wireless N is 300Mbit/s. Whether you get that over your wireless network is irrelevant....that's the standard. ( Sorry didn't mean to sound like a ****Yeah, good luck with that. WiFi is only 54MB/sec (802.11G) and 802.11n is only about 160MB/sec. I doubt 20GB/sec will be here in 3 years.
I think we need T-shirts and hats- DEATH TO HDMI!!!!!!!!!!
I think I can arrange that.
That's how I took it.( Sorry didn't mean to sound like a ****
Rhymes with click and we both have one.That's how I took it.
Which four letters did you type?