Go republicans! Let's restrict womens bodies again!

[Mikado463]

If that teenager is a POS as you wrote above what does that make you as an old male? Perhaps it’s a shame that your mother did not abort you?

so you condone her thinking, Ok, perhaps you're her daddy ?? !! what a douche.........

 

[Dude#1279435]

No, merely providing one F'd up individuals point of view to the abortion debate and yes, it's a shame her mother didn't abort her !!

Yep that's projecting to all liberals, but ok.

 

[SithZedi]

Protests are a longstanding right but they must be legal. This is being allowed at a judge's home in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1507. AG Garland would be well advised to start charging people for this. If this is now to be allowable behaviour the shoe will be on the other foot someday. Cherry pick any issue, i.e., Judges who allow violent criminals back onto the street will be doxxed and victims families and friends will be outside their homes. Not a good future.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1538263973732163586

 

[Mikado463]

Yep that's projecting to all liberals, but ok.

may I suggest you go back to the title of this thread and tell me about projecting

 

[adk highlander]

How much do you wanna bet she participated in BLM protest of some kind........

For a while I have tried to give you the benefit of the doubt. But you continue to prove you are just an asshole, plain and simple.

 

[Dude#1279435]

may I suggest you go back to the title of this thread and tell me about projecting

You're using a tiktok example of all things. That should be clue right there to how it doesn't represent all liberals. It's rather lazy. Try providing examples of I dunno how all liberals support late term abortions or something instead of some idiot kid.

 

[Dude#1279435]

Conservatives are tearing it up here with their degrees in journalism. Look at the investigative work of teens as representative of a liberal majority. Look at how they articulate the difference between state rights and a national ban. 6 weeks vs late term. Add in commentary on cords tied, condoms, the pill, and all that vs life at conception.

Add in rape= oh boy SMH.

 

[SithZedi]

You're using a tiktok example of all things. That should be clue right there to how it doesn't represent all liberals. It's rather lazy. Try providing examples of I dunno how all liberals support late term abortions or something instead of some idiot kid.

Libs of Tiktok can be quite interesting. Wonder why Twitter wants suspend their account for posting direct video of people expressing themselves and their opinions? This person would make a great economist.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1538533685728669696

 

[Mikado463]

You're using a tiktok example of all things. That should be clue right there to how it doesn't represent all liberals. It's rather lazy. Try providing examples of I dunno how all liberals support late term abortions or something instead of some idiot kid.

For Gods sake 'Dude', don't you get it ???? I NEVER said it did, whereas Lovins' title to this thread addressed 'Go Republicans', as all encompassing ! Now do you understand ??

 

[Mikado463]

For a while I have tried to give you the benefit of the doubt. But you continue to prove you are just an asshole, plain and simple.

coming from you I feel so hurt , LOL !!

 

[Mikado463]

Libs of Tiktok can be quite interesting. Wonder why Twitter wants suspend their account for posting direct video of people expressing themselves and their opinions? This person would make a great economist.

LMAO and that's the future of America ?? !!

 

[Dude#1279435]

LMAO and that's the future of America ?? !!

Na, it's tiktok. It's its own planet.

 

[Dude#1279435]

For Gods sake 'Dude', don't you get it ???? I NEVER said it did, whereas Lovins' title to this thread addressed 'Go Republicans', as all encompassing ! Now do you understand ??

Not really. Scroll down the list and you'll see all 18 are Republicans. I doubt this is a state rights bill being introduced but a national, socialist policy for America. They'd say, Well how can you oppose a bill for life? Because it's the same use of force they cry about when the left do it.

Cosponsors - S.99 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Life at Conception Act of 2021

Cosponsors of S.99 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Life at Conception Act of 2021

www.congress.gov

 

[lovinthehd]

For Gods sake 'Dude', don't you get it ???? I NEVER said it did, whereas Lovins' title to this thread addressed 'Go Republicans', as all encompassing ! Now do you understand ??

The title refers to the turd repubs and their enablers who think this is a good thing, which of course it isn't....

 

[Mikado463]

The title refers to the turd repubs and their enablers who think this is a good thing, which of course it isn't....

fair enough, now lets round up an equal amount of 'turd Dims' and dump them all out to sea !!

 

[lovinthehd]

fair enough, now lets round up an equal amount of 'turd Dims' and dump them all out to sea !!

There are plenty of those in some respects for sure, but doubt you'll find all that many on this subject. But if you've got 'em....

 

[GO-NAD!]

Well....there you have it.

Live updates: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade (cnn.com)

 

[rnatalli]

So states may decide on abortion rights, but can't decide their own gun laws? Makes perfect sense.

 

[majorloser]

Murder by any other name is still murder. They gotta live with themselves after they have an abortion.

 

[SithZedi]

So states may decide on abortion rights, but can't decide their own gun laws? Makes perfect sense.

It does if you go by the Constitution. The second amendment directly addresses the right to bear arms Abortion is not mentioned at all. Therefore abortion becomes a issue to be decided at the state level. Roe was not well decided in 73. Even Ruth B. Ginsburg said as much. If the gradual approach had taken it's course, there was a good chance that in most states, abortion would have moved to be where Hillary Clinton stated she wanted it to be in 2008. "Safe, legal, and rare".

“My criticism of Roe is that it seemed to have stopped the momentum on the side of change,” Ginsburg said. She would’ve preferred that abortion rights be secured more gradually, in a process that included state legislatures and the courts, she added. Ginsburg also was troubled that the focus on Roe was on a right to privacy, rather than women’s rights". RGB

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Offers Critique of Roe v. Wade During Law School Visit | University of Chicago Law School

Casual observers of the Supreme Court who came to the Law School to hear Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg speak about Roe v. Wade likely expected a simple message from the longtime defender of reproductive and women’s rights: Roe was a good decision. Those more acquainted with Ginsburg and her...

www.law.uchicago.edu