Some comments on my photo:
Yes, the Axiom driver was lifted from Ilkka's article and pasted onto my originally posted photo by others.
It is indeed not to scale with the other drivers.
I originally posted the picture to show that a similar comparison photo could easily be made that would show the 'Ultra' driver to be 'whimpy' when only visual examination is employed.
The next point is that the 'Ultra' driver in the photo is in fact, not an Ultra driver. This driver is a remnant of my years ago testing of dozens of 12" drivers, and was not a very good performer in spite of it's 42 pound weight.
The 'Ultra' driver does indeed use the same cast basket as the current real Ultra driver, which basket is readily available to build various configurations of 12" driver upon. I configured this driver approximately a year before the Ultra driver appeared in public.
The driver in the photo is actually a better constructed one in that it has a fine mesh that protects the gap from external contamination, whereas the Ultra driver's gap is exposed, and also has a precision machined stage for the spiders.
All of that aside, there is absolutely no way to tell if the 'Ultra' driver in the photo is a good, great or terrible performing 12" driver.
Looking at and weighing a driver tells you what the driver looks like and how much it weighs...nothing more.
I still am curious as to why the Ultra driver was compared to the Axiom driver when it was actually the PB10 that was measured in the shootout
The PB10's driver ain't much to look at, and doesn't weigh much compared to the Ultra driver either, is my guess. This would emphasize the point of the summary, which apparently was that the SVS 10" sub beats the Axiom 12" sub and it's because the Axiom sub's driver is much whimpier that the Ultra's driver...get it? Neither did I.
Bosso