
ErinH
Audioholic General
I'll post updates for those who might care. Wish me luck, guys. 
My reasoning behind saying that was based on the fact that the sender had no feedback and sent from a PO Box... it's quite likely that there's no way to chase the person down. They might not even have a fully verified PayPal account. It's quite possible that PP and Ebay might be able to help the buyer get something back, but I think at this point that he should view any money returned as a surprise not as an expectation.Simply "accepting that you've been screwed" is not the proper course of action.
It's not that easy to hide. In fact, it's quite difficult. The worst case scenario is that the op could file suit against the seller, and his screen name, and his po box, and then get a subpoena to see to whom the po box is issued to...and what their street address is. Hopefully, it doesn't come to all that.My reasoning behind saying that was based on the fact that the sender had no feedback and sent from a PO Box... it's quite likely that there's no way to chase the person down. They might not even have a fully verified PayPal account. It's quite possible that PP and Ebay might be able to help the buyer get something back, but I think at this point that he should view any money returned as a surprise not as an expectation.
Does one need an address to get a PO Box? I thought one of the reasons behind getting a box was the lack of a permanent address. Either way, filing a suit and getting a subpoena will most likely cost more than the $147 that the OP paid for the item. I'm not trying to be defeatist, I'm just saying that for such a relatively small amount of money it's probably not worth all of the trouble and potential paperwork that could come out of filing a suit.It's not that easy to hide. In fact, it's quite difficult. The worst case scenario is that the op could file suit against the seller, and his screen name, and his po box, and then get a subpoena to see to whom the po box is issued to...and what their street address is. Hopefully, it doesn't come to all that.
Yes.Does one need an address to get a PO Box?
Yes, ostensibly. Many do it for anonymity and ulterior motives.I thought one of the reasons behind getting a box was the lack of a permanent address.
Perhaps, but to the victors go the spoils. This includes filing fees, service fees and reasonable attorney fees. Trouble? What of justice, and PAYBACK?Either way, filing a suit and getting a subpoena will most likely cost more than the $147 that the OP paid for the item. I'm not trying to be defeatist, I'm just saying that for such a relatively small amount of money it's probably not worth all of the trouble and potential paperwork that could come out of filing a suit.
Were they in the same state as you? If not, did you have to file in the state in which you did business, they did business, or both? Always good to know for the future!!The court route: If you go to court, subpoena and find out the actual person to sue, and they don't show you win by default.
The great thing is when this slime ball 5 years from now goes to get a loan or lease, he won't get one.
We had a business stiff us for $800 in 2002. Went to court, they didn't show. 3 years later they call up because the can't get a lease for $80K in equipment. We told them we already wrote it off, good luck running their business.
All of which you have to lay out upfront- and in this case where the return policy was clearly spelled out (although very shady and a load of BS in my mind- there's no guarantee you're getting that back. Would you lay out $1000 today for the 50/50 opportunity to make $147 6 months down the road when this finally gets settled?Perhaps, but to the victors go the spoils. This includes filing fees, service fees and reasonable attorney fees.
Technically if you don't have a contract stipulating jurisdiction, courts will find the transaction took place in the sellers state. But I doubt your guy knows thatWere they in the same state as you? If not, did you have to file in the state in which you did business, they did business, or both? Always good to know for the future!!
You can always argue that the 3 days was a period to verify the claims on the sellers page and to get it into a box. Courts are going to give him some leeway on this.All of which you have to lay out upfront- and in this case where the return policy was clearly spelled out (although very shady and a load of BS in my mind- there's no guarantee you're getting that back. Would you lay out $1000 today for the 50/50 opportunity to make $147 6 months down the road when this finally gets settled?
That's not my quote jinjuku.You can always argue that the 3 days was a period to verify the claims on the sellers page and to get it into a box. Courts are going to give him some leeway on this.
that's a good thing. I hold you in much higher regardBut as always, I ain't a lawyer.
The "return policy" may be deemed pure poppycock by the courts. In fact, it may be deemed to violate consumer propection laws. Return restrictions must be reasonable in nature...or none at all.All of which you have to lay out upfront- and in this case where the return policy was clearly spelled out (although very shady and a load of BS in my mind- there's no guarantee you're getting that back. Would you lay out $1000 today for the 50/50 opportunity to make $147 6 months down the road when this finally gets settled?![]()
The buyer paid with Paypal, not a check.My reasoning behind saying that was based on the fact that the sender had no feedback and sent from a PO Box... it's quite likely that there's no way to chase the person down. They might not even have a fully verified PayPal account. It's quite possible that PP and Ebay might be able to help the buyer get something back, but I think at this point that he should view any money returned as a surprise not as an expectation.
I know some guys who know some guys.... but it never hurts to know someone)![]()