M
Mabel
Audiophyte
@Ponzio: Thanks for reporting on the metadata Extraction Tool!
What you say about Windows and 'indexing' I find worrying and incomprensible, but we're veering off-topic now; I guess I'll have to start a new thread for that.
@BoredSysAdmin: Thanks a lot for the links provided; they are really helpful! It's kind of funny how the first link starts by stressing not metadata but the old-and-trusted way of putting files in folders and sub-folders - in fact: the way I used up till now, but with some valuable added advice on organisation. (It even mentioned the bulk-rename utitily I have been using for many years, but I think mp3tag does better.) I.m.o. the file-system is still needed as a 'falll-back' option but it would be a sorry state of affairs of we couldn't do better, nowadays.
I will certainly try out 'Picard' and the MusicBrainz database an report back.
@Bucknekked: "I don't think I had more than the normal amount of metadata envy until..." YES, it does conjure up vista's of how a music library could look like, doesn't it! Until recently, I was not even aware of the extensive options offered by, for instance, mp3 and aac, to add all kinds of extra stuff. Nevertheless, my primary concern here is with just those metadata which are exposed for SEARCHING by a dlna-client. If I understand the technology correctly, only a limited number of fields are added tot the database of the mediaserver and available for searching. Once a single file has been selected, it is up to the client to access the file and gather additional metadata. (Am I right?)
What you say about Windows and 'indexing' I find worrying and incomprensible, but we're veering off-topic now; I guess I'll have to start a new thread for that.
@BoredSysAdmin: Thanks a lot for the links provided; they are really helpful! It's kind of funny how the first link starts by stressing not metadata but the old-and-trusted way of putting files in folders and sub-folders - in fact: the way I used up till now, but with some valuable added advice on organisation. (It even mentioned the bulk-rename utitily I have been using for many years, but I think mp3tag does better.) I.m.o. the file-system is still needed as a 'falll-back' option but it would be a sorry state of affairs of we couldn't do better, nowadays.
I will certainly try out 'Picard' and the MusicBrainz database an report back.
@Bucknekked: "I don't think I had more than the normal amount of metadata envy until..." YES, it does conjure up vista's of how a music library could look like, doesn't it! Until recently, I was not even aware of the extensive options offered by, for instance, mp3 and aac, to add all kinds of extra stuff. Nevertheless, my primary concern here is with just those metadata which are exposed for SEARCHING by a dlna-client. If I understand the technology correctly, only a limited number of fields are added tot the database of the mediaserver and available for searching. Once a single file has been selected, it is up to the client to access the file and gather additional metadata. (Am I right?)