
STRONGBADF1
Audioholic Spartan
What are the pros & cons of a coaxial build?
What about Kef?The main advantage is performance in time, or time-alignment. The drivers are lined up, which prevents the delay between the woofer and tweeter from their different distance between your ears. Time-alignment is much more than physically lining up the components though, it requires accounting for driver delay, crossover delay, and so forth. So, a speaker can perform good in time even if it isn't a coaxial, but that is one advantage from the get-go of a coaxial design.
There are actually some really nice coaxial speakers out there. Sometimes they are determined to be 'cheap,' because they are easier to manufacturer with and there are lots of junky ones out there because of it allowing for a packagable full range speaker... but a good coaxial shouldn't be overlooked.
Some quality brands that use some coaxial designs off the top of my head are Triad, JTR, Bag End and Sonance.
Cool idea.Here's what has been going on in my mind for awhile...
A pair of DIY coaxial speakers mounted in PVC tubing with one small sub centered in between them. (probably that AV123 x-sub I basically won by way of ) Power them with a HK stereo recever with a sub out.(or something similar)
That will effect only the tweeter. With some luck and skill the crossover should be above the range of human voices. Below the tweeter's wave guided range, the dispersion should be wider.A Coaxial has a limited dispersion generally. The design can act as a wave guide which is ideal in the center, but not necessarily for L-R.
They also tend to cost more for good ones from what I can tell.The OP had asked what are the pros & cons for coaxial speakers.
The obvious con is that you do must choose a woofer and tweeter that are already bundled together. That gives you very little choice about the crossover frequency.
In a standard 2-way speaker, you can choose woofers and tweeters separately. That allows greater flexibility in designing a crossover.
A Coaxial has a limited dispersion generally. The design can act as a wave guide which is ideal in the center, but not necessarily for L-R.
If you got the cash build Mark's TL design.
That will effect only the tweeter. With some luck and skill the crossover should be above the range of human voices. Below the tweeter's wave guided range, the dispersion should be wider.
http://www.madisound.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=35_40_402_275&products_id=1696If used in a small room I would be fairly close to the speakers...semi-near field. I also thought about this design as a near field computer set-up.
Really just curious about it. Seems like it would have been done before. That means there must be something wrong with the logic.
Cost could be the major con. Diminishing returns...http://www.madisound.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=35_40_402_275&products_id=1696
is the suggested one. You might also check out full-rangers for near field. They'd probably do the job.
As I said they aren't cheap.
If I were building near field monitors. I'd just mod the Behringer's or a pair of Primus bookshelves.
I do this all the time. In my mind I've built countless subs.Cost could be the major con. Diminishing returns...
I know there are easier ways but I just kinda like these mental exercises.![]()