The BenQ HT2050A is still considered one of the absolute best images you can get for entry level projection under $1,000. You don't add much at $1,300 as you start getting into the UHD DLP pixel shifters at that price point. The pixel shifters do not have the contrast of the 1080p models and IMO aren't going to be a step up for anyone who lives in a 1080p world.
Wireless is a joke, a myth, a stupid thing to expect a projector to do. If you want wireless, get a AppleTV with Airplay, or a Chromecast and attach it to your home network and your A/V receiver. Don't ever ask or expect this from a projector. You will quickly find out how cruddy (almost all) wireless is.
If I were buying new, the BenQ HT2050A is the way I would go. It can give you a 100" diagonal from as close as 8'4" lens to screen. This throw distance matters a LOT as 9' lens to screen for a 100" diagonal is rarely possible.
It is worth noting that the W2000 appears to be a very similar international version of the HT2050A. I'm never sure with non-US models what is what, but Projector Central has the specs for both, and they are nearly identical.
https://www.projectorcentral.com/BenQ-W2000.htm
https://www.projectorcentral.com/BenQ-HT2050A.htm
I'm not sure what projector you have right now, and what you would consider an upgrade. You typically aren't going to get 'silent' from a small, bright, box projector.
I would consider the Sony HW45ES, used, if you can find one at a good price. It is one of the best out there for being dead silent and delivering on great image quality. It is not LCD or DLP, but LCoS, which is generally considered king of the hill in terms of image quality.
Likewise, a used JVC RS46 can be had for under $1,000 and will outperform the Sony, which in turns outperforms the BenQ.
But, used models carry risks and no warranty, which may not be something you want to deal with. Still, the jump in quality is huge. The ISSUE? Neither the Sony nor the JVC can hit a 100" diagonal from 9' lens to screen.