I've been interested in cycling since around 1987. I've even raced in few local races myself. I watched Greg LeMond battle to win by a mere 8 seconds. Back then, you had to wait until Saturday afternoon to get even the slightest glimpse of any TdF action on TV (John Tesh you suck). OLN has been a godsend as I watched every minute of coverage of this year's and last year's tours.
I'll be the first to admit that the technology for cycling and the knowledge of fitness has come a long way since then. The bikes are lighter and the athletes are stronger, but all the top teams have access to these technologies and everyone has the information needed to obtain the best physical condition possible. The rules limit nearly any advantage you might have gained technologically by setting bike weight requirements, etc. The TdF winner primarily comes down to those who have studied the course carefully, found the right places to attack, have durability to handle minor crashes, endurance, a strong team concept, the best overall conditioning, and most importantly, the strongest mind to win. All of these things must come together in the 3 week period in order to win, which Lance and his team have found a way to do SEVEN freaking times.
With cycling, your mind is often your worst enemy, when you are hurting and want to pack it in, you just have to ignore what you think your body is telling you and push on.
I don't think his accomplishments will ever be fully appreciated by the American public because they are way to ignorant about the sport of cycling, its strategies, and its signifigance in europe. That is fine by me. I'd rather know something many peple don't. So stay stupid about cycling I say, I don't want morons like R.I.B. making it commonplace, that's part of what makes it special.