Best small sub for big room.

AVRat

AVRat

Audioholic Ninja
Depending on depth of cabinet, maybe 2 Axiom EP-500s. A little more expensive!
 
S

Steve42

Audioholic
One of the things that sucks about have a sub in a cabinet is the amp with all the setup controls is usually on the back. Too bad more subs did not come with a seperate amp for these kind of installs like the Maestro subwoofer/amp. Depth of subs usally is a problem for cabinet installs too.
 
M

Mike Dzurko

Audioholic Intern
We've done a lot of in-cabinet installs with all three of our subs. The Maestro is of course my favorite, both for output AND the separate amp makes it much easier to setup and adjust. There is no problem with performance when mounted in-cabinet IF proper steps are taken to isolate the sub from the cabinet. The best way is for the sub to set on the floor and essentially build the cabinet around it without touching it. BTW, we can do grills if needed.
 
S

Steve42

Audioholic
Mike Dzurko said:
There is no problem with performance when mounted in-cabinet IF proper steps are taken to isolate the sub from the cabinet. The best way is for the sub to set on the floor and essentially build the cabinet around it without touching it. BTW, we can do grills if needed.
Now I didn't think of having the sub sitting on the floor, that indeed would be ideal. That combined with a sealed unit like the Maestro would seem to work very well. Hopefully the spot where the sub needs to go will be a decent spot for bass response in his room. I would highly recommend an external EQ in anycase like the Velodyne SMS-1 to help with getting the best (flatest) bass response at the listening position.

Cool to know you can do the grills if needed too. I'll know where to look if I ever need to have a sub in a cabinet.

Having owned a Force before, I know you guys make very high quality stuff that's for sure.
 
Last edited:
MACCA350

MACCA350

Audioholic Chief
I've been biting my tongue on this thread, but from all the criteria it seems that a Velodyne DD-15 or DD-18 may fit the bill.

My reasoning:
  • The DD's are a sealed sub
  • They use a remote for all setup and control(you'll never need to touch the back, unless you change wiring etc.)
  • They use a Digital amp that runs cooler then other types(It's also completely internal with no heat sinks on the back, so heat in an enclosed cabinet wont be an issue)
  • Digital Eq(SMS-1) is standard on all DD's(this would come in handy with the limited placement options, also the DD-15 and DD18 have an input on the front for the calibration microphone

Add to all that they are a digital servo driven(adjustable from 3,500 to 16,000 times a second), using a world class quality driver, and a 1250Wrms 3000Wpeak 97% efficient Digital amp, all of which is designed and manufactured by a leading company that only produces subwoofers. This all makes for an extremely accurate and powerful unit that hits -3db at 15Hz and has the tools to let you seamlessly integrated it into any system.

You also get software updates so you get the benefits longterm. Here's an interview with Bruce Hall(President of Velodyne Acoustics) where he speaks about the technology of the DD series.

Anyway, I have a DD-15 and I guarantee they wont disappoint, and thats my 2 cents worth.

cheers:)
 
S

Steve42

Audioholic
Unfortunatley the DD-15 probably will not have the output to fill that huge room, and it costs more than the OP $2,500 limit (If your lucky you can find a used one for $2400 or so on Audiogon). To put some perspective on SPL output, the DD-18 (much too expensive for OP) has roughly the same output capability as the ACI Maestro (Found that from a thread long ago on AVS by Craigsub who owned both).

The DD series strong suite is music without a doubt and the built-in EQ. Don't get me wrong it's a great sub, just a little too pricey for the SPL output needed to fill a large room when compared to some others. Especially when you can buy the EQ functionality seperately (SMS-1) and still pay less money overall.

btw, I forgot to mention that ACi offers a 5 year transferable warranty, not many subs can touch that and still fit the OP "bill"

P.S. The DD-18 is probably to deep in size even if it was not so expensive. The DD-15 may be too deep as well.
 
Last edited:
B

Buckeye_Nut

Audioholic Field Marshall
Steve42 said:
Agreed on the mini-subs. But the OP has stated the sub has to go into a cabinet. The SVS will not work for that. The Maestro has similar output to the Ultra/2 and can go into a cabinet. I would not personally ever put a sub in a cabinet though.
Yes, I read that later in the thread. I have a radical take on the whole 'hidden speaker' phenomenon. Whenever I read about someone wanting to build a HT that cannot be seen, I always cringe. I think to myself......."why bother?" I think that maybe HT isnt the best hobby for that type of individual, and that maybe that person should look into a different hobby that wont 'ruin' the look of their living rooms. Golf maybe??:rolleyes:
 
S

Steve42

Audioholic
Buckeye_Nut said:
Yes, I read that later in the thread. I have a radical take on the whole 'hidden speaker' phenomenon. Whenever I read about someone wanting to build a HT that cannot be seen, I always cringe. I think to myself......."why bother?" I think that maybe HT isnt the best hobby for that type of individual, and that maybe that person should look into a different hobby that wont 'ruin' the look of their living rooms. Golf maybe??:rolleyes:
Yeah, makes you wonder sometimes. I guess some people just don't care about the sound as much. Oh well, like you said there's always golf. :)
 
D

df4801

Banned
I agree with you guys and thanks for the info.

But you have to realize that to many people with multi-million dollar homes, the look is more important than the sound. They will likely only use the HT 2-3x per month. Thats my friends goal.
 
S

Steve42

Audioholic
df4801 said:
I agree with you guys and thanks for the info.

But you have to realize that to many people with multi-million dollar homes, the look is more important than the sound. They will likely only use the HT 2-3x per month. Thats my friends goal.
Yeah, I can see that, sorry to come off in a negative way. I'm sure he will be pleased with the end product, much better than what he is used to I'm sure.

Btw, if he does build a cabinet that allows for the sub to sit on the ground and can have an opening in the back the same size as the front (or a little bigger and maybe also covered with cloth), he may want to consider the $1400 Earthquake MKV-15 after all. He could place the passive radiator towards the back wall (leave about 5" from the wall), and the active driver facing the room. As I said it's only 17.5" cubed, so it's much smaller than the Maestro. It also has about the same SPL output as the Maestro from what I can tell. Probably even a little more above 25Hz. Definately more of a HT sub than the Maestro, but still does very well for music. Again a EQ like the Velo SMS-1 is highly recommended.

Steve
 
M

Mike Dzurko

Audioholic Intern
Buckeye_Nut said:
Yes, I read that later in the thread. I have a radical take on the whole 'hidden speaker' phenomenon. Whenever I read about someone wanting to build a HT that cannot be seen, I always cringe. I think to myself......."why bother?" I think that maybe HT isnt the best hobby for that type of individual, and that maybe that person should look into a different hobby that wont 'ruin' the look of their living rooms. Golf maybe??:rolleyes:
I used to feel that way. If we're talking about straight two-channel audio I would still agree. . . you just can't get a great soundstage from two speakers built into a wall. However, for multi-channel and HT, it is possible to have first rate sound from a "hidden" system. It's a matter of using the right equipment, meant for built in use, and implementation. It really does open up high-end HT to a lot of folks who want stealth audio.
 
MACCA350

MACCA350

Audioholic Chief
Steve42 wrote:
Unfortunatley the DD-15 probably will not have the output to fill that huge room, and it costs more than the OP $2,500 limit (If your lucky you can find a used one for $2400 or so on Audiogon). To put some perspective on SPL output, the DD-18 (much too expensive for OP) has roughly the same output capability as the ACI Maestro (Found that from a thread long ago on AVS by Craigsub who owned both).

The DD series strong suite is music without a doubt and the built-in EQ. Don't get me wrong it's a great sub, just a little too pricey for the SPL output needed to fill a large room when compared to some others. Especially when you can buy the EQ functionality seperately (SMS-1) and still pay less money overall.

btw, I forgot to mention that ACi offers a 5 year transferable warranty, not many subs can touch that and still fit the OP "bill"

P.S. The DD-18 is probably to deep in size even if it was not so expensive. The DD-15 may be too deep as well.
DD15 = 20" H x 18" W x 17.75" D
DD18 = 23" H x 21.25" W x 19.25" D
Maestro = 19" H x 24" W x 22" D
The Maestro has the biggest footprint of them all:confused:

I found a thread that craigsub contributed on where they were comparing the Maestro to the Paradigm Servo 15 and they found the Paradigm had more output than the Maestro. If thats the case, the AVS tests show both the DD15 and DD18 stomp all over the Paradigm!

Just for reference my DD15 fills a 23x17x9 room with over 123db easy(well above the advised 115db peaks for movies) and with that dynamic range and accuracy its good for both music and movies. Sure you can get a louder sub, but you'll probably sacrifice accuracy for it, and that can be acceptable, it all depends on what your looking for. Personally I've heard enough boom boxes in my time, now I appreciate the articulation and complex detail that can be found in the bottom end of both movies and music.

Goodnight all:)
 
S

Steve42

Audioholic
MACCA350 said:
Steve42 wrote:
DD15 = 20" H x 18" W x 17.75" D
DD18 = 23" H x 21.25" W x 19.25" D
Maestro = 19" H x 24" W x 22" D
The Maestro has the biggest footprint of them all:confused:

I found a thread that craigsub contributed on where they were comparing the Maestro to the Paradigm Servo 15 and they found the Paradigm had more output than the Maestro. If thats the case, the AVS tests show both the DD15 and DD18 stomp all over the Paradigm.
You might want to read a little closer. ;) The Maestro version we are talking about here is the "custom install" version which is meant to be installed into a cabinet with the driver firing out instead of down and it is 22" H, 22" W, and 14" D. Depth will be the biggest concern when installing into a cabinet.

If you read that thread carefully all the way through, you will find three things. First, you will find that the OP of that thread preferred the sound of the Maestro. Two, ultimately he found out that he did the original SPL tests wrong and found that the output was about the same with the Maestro after further testing. ;) Three, Have where have you seen that the Servo 15 gets trounced by the DD-15?:confused:

Another point is if you compare the DD-18 in Yates sub shootout to the Maestro that Craig tested after you make the adjustments for different mic distance, the output is very close! To this day Craig still feels the Maestro was the best sounding sub of the recent subs he's owned with the DD-18 pretty close to a tie.

You also completely avoided the fact that the DD-15 and 18 are too expensive for the OP price range. I'm glad you like your sub though. Btw, I don't own a Maestro.

Good night to you (actually good morning) :D

Steve
 
Last edited:
MACCA350

MACCA350

Audioholic Chief
Three, Have where have you seen that the Servo 15 gets trounced by the DD-15?
Sorry, AV Talk Sub tests
If you read that thread carefully all the way through, you will find three things. First, you will find that the OP of that thread preferred the sound of the Maestro. Two, ultimately he found out that he did the original SPL tests wrong and found that the output was about the same with the Maestro having more output down low I believe.
I also had a concern about the tests in that thread due to room interaction. And yea I didn't read all the way through;)
you will find that the OP of that thread preferred the sound of the Maestro. Two,
Yes, we all have our preferences and tastes
I'm glad you like your sub though
Oh, you noticed that:D

cheers:)
 
S

Steve42

Audioholic
MACCA350 said:
Ahhh.. now it makes sense, the was the version 1 model reviewed there from the top of the review on AVtalk:
"RRP: $1500 (black ash laminate; light cherry or rosenut wood veneer, add $250)
No longer a current model."


From Ed Mullin and Illka's conversations on AVS:
"From 35 Hz and up, V2 delivers around 107 dB, while V1 only around 95 dB. Meaning you would need four V1's to match a single V2"

And lets not stop there, Ed M. had this to say about the DD-15 max output of the DD-15 at 20Hz:
"maximum output of 92 dB at 20 Hz"

Conversely the Maestro SPL #'s at 20Hz are 100.6dB and the Servo15V2 is 99 dB. (See Craigs adjusted #'s from that AVS thread I post below. ;)

I think you see my point, it's best to have all the right info. :)

For the posts I got the info out of look here (It starts with Ed saying the 92db at 20Hz down the post a bit with Illka then talking about output differences in the Servo15 V1 and V2): http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?p=7216641&&#post7216641

MACCA350 said:
I also had a concern about the tests in that thread due to room interaction. And yea I didn't read all the way through;)
Well at the very end of that thread the Maestro actually betters the Servo15V2 at 20Hz by 1.6dB and is only 1.2dB down from it at 25Hz.

"SO ... Final, adjusted 20 Hz numbers :

Maestro ... 95.8 to 100.6 dB
Servo 15 ... 95.5 to 99 dB

And, without making anyone suffer through all that calculation stuff, the final 25 Hz numbers :

Maestro ... 99.8 to 102.8 dB
Paradigm ... 102 to 104 dB

I hope this helps clarify a few things ..."


So I too hope that clarifies a few things :cool:
 
Sheep

Sheep

Audioholic Warlord
Steve, you may want to look at the Sig Servo's numbers from AVtalk. It performs on par with the Servo V2, cept with a fancy cabinet. Look around the 100Hz area on the THD graph.

IMO completely unacceptable.

SheepStar
 
S

Steve42

Audioholic
Sheep said:
Steve, you may want to look at the Sig Servo's numbers from AVtalk. It performs on par with the Servo V2, cept with a fancy cabinet. Look around the 100Hz area on the THD graph.

IMO completely unacceptable.

SheepStar
Sheep,

Let me preface this by saying I'm not the one who brought up the Servo-15 in this thread. Be that as it may at 100Hz THD is still below 9% at 120dB!. :eek:

First of all I realize some cross there subs over as high as 100Hz, but when most people are using subs the caliber of the Servo's , Maestro's, and DD series etc. they are most likely going to be using a cross-over at around 50-80Hz. So it would pretty much be a none issue. Second of all not many people are going to be able to notice THD at the levels of around 115db-120dB especially at that frequency. The harmonics of 100Hz will be very hard to hear at anywhere near those levels.

Have you ever heard of the Klippel test? http://www.klippel.de/aura/

Most people that take it average around -12dB to -18dB as far as their sensitivity to THD. That translates into most people not being able to audibly hear THD until it reaches somewhere around 13-26%. I don't know about you, but I was quite shocked to hear about this myself. In fact when I took the test with my $500 pair of Sony CD3000 headphones several times, I shockingly and honestly found that I averaged around a -12dB sensitivity. :eek:
If you happen to take it, make sure you do it several times because since with every question you have a 50/50 chance of getting it right, guessing can play a big part.

For more info you can see this thread where wae have been talking about it starting at around this post (and continuing for several pages): http://forums.audioholics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=168463#post168463

Just before that post, Craig quoted Kieth Yates when he did that huge Sub shoot-out testing the Triad Platium sub. Here is what he said:

"The Platinum did a more credible job with the U-571 depth charges, which showed a compelling if less than teeth-rattling concussiveness up to a peak level of 107dB (Fig.B4). It got through Pearl Harbor's Gooding-at-the-guns passage at the same level (Fig.D4) without blunting individual gun discharges or adding a flapping/thwocking quality, a reasonably impressive achievement for a unit of this size and price.....In none of these four core movie clips did the Triad's highish measured distortion draw attention to itself; in fact, the unit steadfastly refused to honk, rattle, rasp, or otherwise let on that my torture tracks were discomfiting it. Rather than issue distress cries, it simply stopped getting louder as I slowly turned up the level"

And the graph: (pay attention to the very high levels of THD in the lower frequencies where Yates was referring to. :eek: )



And then Craig had this to say:

"We have done more blind tests here in which people, such as yourself, claimed all sorts of things would be audible. However, when the lights went down, suddenly all these audible problems or differences disappeared.

Mr. Yates is pretty exprienced at this listening vs. measurement stuff. Or is Yates no longer a credible source ? ;)"


Anyway, at 115dB-120dB playing 100Hz with only 8dB or so of THD, IMHO is pretty much "moot".

Steve
 
Last edited:
Sheep

Sheep

Audioholic Warlord
Distortion becomes much more audible the higher you go up in frequency. That subwoofer has a peak of 10% at 120Hz. It then TAPERS down to around 60Hz before it flattens out. That is pathedic for a 15inch servo controlled sub. Look at the DD-15s numbers. No such spike, AND the EQ isn't even on.

I'm not talking abuot THD around 20Hz, I'm talking about THD around 60Hz. And when you cross a sub out at 80Hz, its not a brick wall.

SheepStar
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top