Yes, everyone is entitled to opinions. But, it must be pointed out that it is based on flawed observations so others can judge that opinion accordingly.
On the same line of thought, to what extent can you reasonably defend the A500?
On the objective tests of that component.
At some point you would have to concede (i would think) that there is a difference in the quality of the parts and the design compared to more expensive amps.
Why? What is the evidence that the parts in that amp is causing it not to be transparent??? The objective data would show us this. It doesn't. And, if the design was poor, that too would show up on the objective testing. It doesn't.
I'm saying that I think I hear a clear difference between the A500 and the Rotel 1070. No reason to coldly dismiss my opinion as bull.
Why not??? After all, the listing protocol, by your own admission, was rather weak.
I just confirmed that the hiss I experienced is in-line with what others experience with the A500.
But you had another component connected to the A500. Perhaps that is the hiss generator, not the A500? And, I bet others did the same way, with another component, a preamp, connected to it. So, it is not the A500 at fault, at least that was not demonstrated.
Besides I was saying that I wanted cleaner highs compared to the Rotel 1070. Which provides everything I want except perhaps the sound is a bit grating. I would think that grating highs is not a property of too much interference coming through on the signal.
Without a proper listening protocol, you will never know where the issues are, if there are any at all.