
cpp
Audioholic Ninja
I use both, it all depends on how much room you have if you want to use spades;. Never heard any sound degradation between both.
If it was introduced in the high-end cable market, many of our problems would be solved.imagine a new speaker connector is invented that looks just like a North American power cable plug and can fit into a wall socket.
The 'metal' covers are actually just plastic. They are a 'metal looking' plastic cover on those connectors, so while you get a slick look from them, they are completely covered and safe from shorts! The old ones I had from Rotel were just red and black plastic covers. I love the look of the 'metal' plastic covers which are actually in use now.I'd probably put some heat shrink tubing over the metal covers to insulate them... not that I ever unplug energized gear. It's that OCD/Love of over-engineering thing coming out...
Perfect!The 'metal' covers are actually just plastic. They are a 'metal looking' plastic cover on those connectors, so while you get a slick look from them, they are completely covered and safe from shorts! The old ones I had from Rotel were just red and black plastic covers. I love the look of the 'metal' plastic covers which are actually in use now.
How does that suit you?
I agree with using spades for long term durability. I was using banana connectors, the same mentioned a few posts back, out of 16 used, 12 broke. During that time I was repositioning the subs and mains placement in the room. Spades have proven to be much more robust and less apt to break.The only advantage is convenience. If they're going to be connected and disconnected over and over again, they're easier for that. But the physics works against them. Locking ones are better, as mentioned upthread, but spades make for a more secure connection.