Let me add this to the mix:
Israel has targeted Hezbollah members with pagers rigged with explosives. The New Arab looks into whether this violated international law?
www.newarab.com
Along with an editorial from The Guardian:
Editorial: Benjamin Netanyahu’s hold on power depends on his nation being at war. The region is paying a high price
apple.news
I had seen some other conversation about use of booby traps and international law. Again, I do not claim expert status, but the key aspects are, did Israel do enough to distinguish between civilian and combatant casualty. Either way, with claimed civilian casualty, one can argue they did not…
This attack is absolutely treading a very fine line of legality, and is quite frankly ethically wrong even if not technically illegal according to the agreement Israel is a signatory of.
I’ve studied ethics, including that as applied to war. It’s a sticky mess no matter how you slice it.
However, booby traps that affect non-combatant citizenry are clearly proscribed by law. Thus one could argue that Israel is now acting as a terrorist state.
Please understand, this is not my stance. I just hope to further the conversation. Clearly there are many who think Israel is right to do whatever they deem necessary. Others, not so much, to the extent some even side with Hamas over Israel as it regards the attack on Oct.7:
SOMETHING I DO NOT SUPPORT AT ALL.
You don't have to like or agree with my questioning this, but I'm
not going to just stand put and say this is OK, simply rubber stamping Israel's actions.
I've admitted that this is something I'm struggling with as a matter of course. I'm a little surprised more people aren't having trouble with this as well.