Would you consider a Yamaha RX-396 Stereo receiver from 1999 "vintage"?
Squishman Audioholic General Today at 12:16 PM #1 Would you consider a Yamaha RX-396 Stereo receiver from 1999 "vintage"?
BoredSysAdmin Audioholic Slumlord Today at 12:18 PM #2 Squishman said: Would you consider a Yamaha RX-396 Stereo receiver from 1999 "vintage"? Click to expand... The Vintage Seeker | Editorial: How do we define vintage? How vintage is defined www.thevintageseeker.ca TL;DR: 1999 is 25 years now and could be considered "vintage" by some, while others say 40 years plus is needed to be called vintage. YMMV
Squishman said: Would you consider a Yamaha RX-396 Stereo receiver from 1999 "vintage"? Click to expand... The Vintage Seeker | Editorial: How do we define vintage? How vintage is defined www.thevintageseeker.ca TL;DR: 1999 is 25 years now and could be considered "vintage" by some, while others say 40 years plus is needed to be called vintage. YMMV
Squishman Audioholic General Today at 12:20 PM #3 It doesn't look the part, having a more modern black look. It sure sounds good. 50 wpc.
BoredSysAdmin Audioholic Slumlord Today at 12:23 PM #4 Squishman said: It doesn't look the part, having a more modern black look. It sure sounds good. 50 wpc. Click to expand... Agree. Something like circa 1984, the Yamaha R-100 is definitely vintage: https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/8f4AAOSwmHNmvPmx/s-l1600.webp
Squishman said: It doesn't look the part, having a more modern black look. It sure sounds good. 50 wpc. Click to expand... Agree. Something like circa 1984, the Yamaha R-100 is definitely vintage: https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/8f4AAOSwmHNmvPmx/s-l1600.webp
Squishman Audioholic General Today at 12:31 PM #6 Does anyone remember the Circuit City commercial? "50 watts per channel, baby cakes".
