Search results

Awesome. I tried unsuccessfully to do that. Would you volunteer to do this each time we update the excel file?

Wow, I honestly didn't pay much attention to that data since we didn't have reviews done. I will see if I can contact them. Impressive!

Time of Reconcile our Differences This constant back and forth between us, forum members and Axiom isn't productive for anyone involved. I honestly don't have it in my heart to sustain negative energy like this. I myself am to blame because I allowed it to progress on this forum rather than...

up to +3dB if not co-located and up to +6dB if colocated. This is highly frequency dependent of course.

Thanks I found the 2 typos for Velodyne and fixed it. All last years tests are there too. Tab2 has 3 of the 4 tests Paul did. I kept Josh's tests for Rythmik instead b/c it was tested for multiple modes.

refresh your browser, clear out your cache and try it again please.

The Excel Data sheet has been zipped and added to the first post in this thread in case anyone can't locate it in the main article.

OK I replaced the image with this one which is from the actual article instead of a prior Velodyne review.

Please see the image below the LINK to EXCEL is circled.

Yes and this really concerns me that people are missing it. I even wrote how to find it and put a screenshot image circling where on the page its located. Here is what I wrote under that image: Please let me know if anyone is having a hard time locating the Excel File. Thanks.

Speaking of Subs Guys; We just published the most comprehensive data bass of subwoofer measurements ever done by an A/V Publication. I tabulated all the Axiom subs I measured too but they are for V1 versions only. See: Audioholics Subwoofer Measurement Data Compilation & Report &mdash...

The only time too much bracing can be detrimental is if the braces aren't properly sized and coupled to the panels or if there are simply too many braces and it compromises internal volume.

There also comes a point where over analyzing a situation can be counterproductive, especially if the analysis isn't accurate enough to reveal the problem. Common sense and a good understanding of mechanics will get you pretty far. I see little point it trying to justify using 1 less brace or...

There are 2 types of people in this world: 1. those that own Ferrari's 2. those that own Ferrari shirts I am in the #2 :rolleyes:

sticky rubber feet can be bought at home depot for $3-4 per set of 4. I installed these under my desktop speakers and it was beneficial to my ears.

Thanks for the clarity Sean and I agree though I suspect audibility is also highly dependent on what frequency range the problem exists too. Since when is overdesigning a product a bad thing? Heck if it were, we wouldn't have Ferrari sports cars or any cars than can run a 1/4 mile faster...

Agreed and it really depends on the cabinet size, driver compliment, and output levels sustained within the enclosure. Most loudspeaker engineers choose to stiffen the cabinet enough to push resonance out of the bandwidth of the woofer to make it less audible.

That assumes the amplitude remains the same which it doesn't as can be seen in David's analysis when adding more braces. You also need to look at more than a single point on the cabinet to see how the resonance modes change when stiffening is added. Aside from simulations and analysis, I know...

When I covered the new Status 8T speakers I posted the question: Sports car or new speakers? In this case, you'd have to say New House or Speakers? However if one is contemplating a new $200k home, they probably can't afford these speakers. :eek:

It's exceeds lunacy since the analog noise floor never exceeds more than 19-20 bits at best due to Johnson noise.