B&W 683 Power Options

E

EvanSpurlock

Enthusiast
Hey guys I just purchased a pair of B&W 683's and I currently have them hooked up to a Yamaha Rx-V373. They sound really good but I feel like that receiver is not driving them to their potential. I'm curious as to what I could do to get the most out of them to really make them shine. It's a 5.1 system so they're not being played just for music, but like I said I want the most out of my system as I can get. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
...I feel like that receiver is not driving them to their potential...
Why is that ?

Does the AVR shut down ?

Unless you are driving the speakers to extreme SPL from a far distance (large room), I think you are just fine.

They sound good, so just relax & enjoy & don't worry it.
 
E

EvanSpurlock

Enthusiast
Why is that ?

Does the AVR shut down ?

Unless you are driving the speakers to extreme SPL from a far distance (large room), I think you are just fine.

They sound good, so just relax & enjoy & don't worry it.
That's a good point. Well lets say they are put in a larger room in the future what would you recommend?
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
The 683 is 86dB/2.83v/m. From 20ft listening distance, I predict that they will require no more than 50 WPC, assuming the total SPL (speakers + subs) is no more than 107dBC and the SPL from the 2 front speakers (subs turned off) is no more than 90dBC.

Power Output @ 1% THD 2CH 8 ohms/ 2CH 4 ohms/ 5CH 8 ohms.
$1200 Marantz 6006: 153.2/195.8/92.0
$1200 Denon 3312: 143.3/225.5/103.0
$1200 Yamaha 1020: 129.2/173.0/73.2
$1100 Pioneer SC61: 150.3/247.5/127.7
$1000 Anthem 300: 116.3/165.9/83.4
$1000 Sherwood 977: 145.1/209.9/109.2
$500 HK 1700: 108.9/196.3/39.5
$900 Denon 2313: 152.1/192.5/90.8
$580 Denon 1913: 117.7/151.1/81.7
$550 Yamaha 573: 111.4/126.2/24.9
$500 Sony 1030: 134.7/167.7/90.4
$450 Yamaha 473: 96.5/143.2/Protection Mode
$450 Pioneer VSX42: 118.2/157.8/79.9
$350 Denon 1612: 118.5/141.5/79.8
$330 Pioneer 821: 110.3/150.7/78.1
$230 Sony 520: 141.7/160.6/81.3

So any AVR that can output > 50 WPC should work.

I like Denon & Marantz because of the Audyssey Dynamic EQ. I stay away from Onkyo due to reliability.

Call Electronic Expo and see if they have a Denon 3313 for about $500.
 
E

EvanSpurlock

Enthusiast
The 683 is 86dB/2.83v/m. From 20ft listening distance, I predict that they will require no more than 50 WPC, assuming the total SPL (speakers + subs) is no more than 107dBC and the SPL from the 2 front speakers (subs turned off) is no more than 90dBC.

Power Output @ 1% THD 2CH 8 ohms/ 2CH 4 ohms/ 5CH 8 ohms.
$1200 Marantz 6006: 153.2/195.8/92.0
$1200 Denon 3312: 143.3/225.5/103.0
$1200 Yamaha 1020: 129.2/173.0/73.2
$1100 Pioneer SC61: 150.3/247.5/127.7
$1000 Anthem 300: 116.3/165.9/83.4
$1000 Sherwood 977: 145.1/209.9/109.2
$500 HK 1700: 108.9/196.3/39.5
$900 Denon 2313: 152.1/192.5/90.8
$580 Denon 1913: 117.7/151.1/81.7
$550 Yamaha 573: 111.4/126.2/24.9
$500 Sony 1030: 134.7/167.7/90.4
$450 Yamaha 473: 96.5/143.2/Protection Mode
$450 Pioneer VSX42: 118.2/157.8/79.9
$350 Denon 1612: 118.5/141.5/79.8
$330 Pioneer 821: 110.3/150.7/78.1
$230 Sony 520: 141.7/160.6/81.3

So any AVR that can output > 50 WPC should work.

I like Denon & Marantz because of the Audyssey Dynamic EQ. I stay away from Onkyo due to reliability.

Call Electronic Expo and see if they have a Denon 3313 for about $500.
Thank you for the reply! I am a Denon fan myself. I had been looking at one of the Maverick Audio DAC's, would a DAC serve as equal or maybe better purpose as a new receiver would?
 
fuzz092888

fuzz092888

Audioholic Warlord
Thank you for the reply! I am a Denon fan myself. I had been looking at one of the Maverick Audio DAC's, would a DAC serve as equal or maybe better purpose as a new receiver would?
No, not even close. If you're talking about getting rid of the Yamaha receiver and getting a single MA DAC, then they are definitely not equal. The MA DAC wouldn't have an amp section, it wouldn't be able to deliver sound to all 5 speakers and the sub, it has no HDMI or video processing, and it has no bass management among other things.

If you're talking about adding it to the receiver, then I think it would be a waste of money since the DAC's in receivers are perfectly competent.
 
E

EvanSpurlock

Enthusiast
No, not even close. If you're talking about getting rid of the Yamaha receiver and getting a single MA DAC, then they are definitely not equal. The MA DAC wouldn't have an amp section, it wouldn't be able to deliver sound to all 5 speakers and the sub, it has no HDMI or video processing, and it has no bass management among other things.

If you're talking about adding it to the receiver, then I think it would be a waste of money since the DAC's in receivers are perfectly competent.
Yeah I meant to say id be adding it to the receiver but I didn't know if it would help because the Yamaha has the burr brown dac on all channels. So it would be a waste??
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
Thank you for the reply! I am a Denon fan myself. I had been looking at one of the Maverick Audio DAC's, would a DAC serve as equal or maybe better purpose as a new receiver would?
IMO, unequivocally NO! A total waste of money.

I would not mess with any DAC. You won't hear any difference IMO.

But a few people do like separate DAC. Different strokes for different folks. I am just not one of those. :D
 
E

EvanSpurlock

Enthusiast
IMO, unequivocally NO! A total waste of money.

I would not mess with any DAC. You won't hear any difference IMO.

But a few people do like separate DAC. Different strokes for different folks. I am just not one of those. :D
Okay well i appreciate your opinions! You also Fuzz!
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top