Pioneer Elite 2012 SC Series Reciever Offerings Preview

[kesando]

Seem like a Pioneer receiver with MCCAC handling the upper frequencies and XT32 handling the subs would workout great. I would love to get my hands on an SVS AS-EQ1.

 

[revracer23]

Has anyone purchased one of these yet? I could use some advice. I just purchased the pioneer vsx52. Just before I saw these new ones pioneer is coming out with. Are the separate component receivers that much better.

Some options I have:
The vsx 52 I just bought went on clearance so I can return mine and save $100, so a total of $800 for the receiver.

The 3 Zone SC-55 went on sale as well for $100 less for $1500. How does this one compare to the new SC-65? it is only 9.1 compared to the 9.2 SC-65.

Or get the new SC-65 for $1600, with 3 zones, 3 sub hook ups, new hdmi technology, and more power per channel than the 52 but less than the 65.

I would love some opinions of what you think I should do. Is the extra $800 even worth it for the SC-65?

 

[revracer23]

I guess no one has the new pioneer elite receivers yet to actually comment on them? I'll keep researching.

 

[DG69]

Amazing output and amazingly complicated

Using the Pioneer Elite SC-67 for a home theater (replacing a NAD T770). The A/V output is amazing. Even with the assistance of professional installers, the set-up was problematic. Documentation from Pioneer was inadequate. The A/V Installer software did not work. The 131 page manual was difficult to use. Telephone calls to Pioneer tech. support elicited comments such as ("I'm not familiar with this product," or "All I can do is read the manual and try to guide you."). The system is now working (sending output in my primary listening room to B&W surround sound speakers, and in another room to 30 year Rogers Sound Lab Studio Monitors). The audio output is unbelievably good, even to the 30 year old speakers. The video output to a Pioneer Elite Kuro is a clear improvement. Perhaps with time, patience and experimentation we will learn how to use the features of this receiver. Better documentation and guidance from the manufacturer is needed.

 

[Adam]

Welcome to the forum!

We'll be happy to help with any questions that you have about setup on that receiver. Doesn't mean that we'll do any better than you , but we can try.

 

[slipperybidness]

Using the Pioneer Elite SC-67 for a home theater (replacing a NAD T770). The A/V output is amazing. Even with the assistance of professional installers, the set-up was problematic. Documentation from Pioneer was inadequate. The A/V Installer software did not work. The 131 page manual was difficult to use. Telephone calls to Pioneer tech. support elicited comments such as ("I'm not familiar with this product," or "All I can do is read the manual and try to guide you."). The system is now working (sending output in my primary listening room to B&W surround sound speakers, and in another room to 30 year Rogers Sound Lab Studio Monitors). The audio output is unbelievably good, even to the 30 year old speakers. The video output to a Pioneer Elite Kuro is a clear improvement. Perhaps with time, patience and experimentation we will learn how to use the features of this receiver. Better documentation and guidance from the manufacturer is needed.

Pioneer Elite strikes again!

Yeah, the elite line is notorious for being tough to setup and operate. I have an older VSX-82TXS and it was tough. I got it going and the basics down without too much problem. I have read the manual in it's entirety probably 3 times over 4-5 years.

I'm a seasoned pro on this unit by now, still every now and then some button will get hit by mistake and I lose either audio or video signal. First few times it took a while to figure out, but now I'm pretty much immune to its quirks. Now that I know what I'm doing on it, that is one of the factors that makes me want to stick with it and not relearn all this on a new (but probably easier) unit.

 

[OaklandRobb]

The comparison article attached to the first post is great, and just what I was looking for. The Pioneer website certainly doesn't provide this information. Should I assume that if something isn't mentioned as being different for a particular model, then it is the same? What I mean is should I assume that the quality of the various components is the same across the line? Yes, the higher models support more channels and with more output, but if you don't need the additional channels and aren't trying to fill a large room with sound, will they sound the same? If measured, would the specs be the same? Is the MCACC the same across the line or do the higher models provide more levels of control? I just run a one room, 5.1 system, so don't need or want to pay for the extra channels, as well as extra heat, as well as extra current draw. But I do want to get the best sound, and to be able to apply the best room correction to get the most out of my setting.

Thanks for the guidance.

Robb

 

[Heelgrad92]

I love it

I just replaced my old Onkyo receiver with the SC-61, and I am impressed. I had it professionally installed and replaced my front Energy speakers with a pair of Klipsch bookshelf reference speakers. I also added some rear Pioneer Elite in ceiling 6 1/2 inch speakers for a 5.1 setup. I was blown away with how powerful this turned out to be, and by how hard I have to push this before it starts to distort. It is appreciably better than my Onkyo and it runs a lot cooler. There is the usual assortment surround modes as well as the extended stereo which engages all five speakers. The AirPlay feature is new to me and I love it as well. No wires, just walk around the house with the IPhone, picking the next song. I have a zone 2 through the rest of the house as well, with the same results. It's very easy to use.