thanks for the reply.. i will do all those things you suggest but I believe they already done them all....
as an aside since the HDMI spec is not proven for cables >25 feet...
is it better to have 2 x 15 feet HDMI cables connected in the middle with the repeater linked above or is it better to have a single 30 ft HDMI cable?
which gives better HDMI signal?
thanks
You have done a good job of trouble shooting.
It still might be the cable. Digital signals are not like analog. They are sent in busts, and slight damage to cables can cause reflections and data loss. Now there always is data loss and there always is error correction at work, to restore and or interpolate lost data.
Now the problem is there is variability between equipment as to the strength, of not only error correction, but data buffers. So you could easily have some equipment work with highly incomplete corrupted data and not others. Also remember HDMI is a two way communication for the HDCP codes.
The next issue is that HDMI cables are very fragile, due to there being so many conductors in the cable. It is not a good idea to fish HDMI cables. HDMI cables should be gently passed through conduit.
Since you fished the cable, I'm putting my money on slight damage to the cable caused by fishing.
So you absolutely need to know that your Pioneer receiver can communicate with your projector with another cable.
If it can't then there is an HDCP code incompatibility between your receiver and the projector. This is possible, but unlikely. If it does communicate then the problem is the cable.
Now you can get HDMI cables that will go 50 ft.
If you do have to use a repeater, the best location will be at the midway point.