Are they better than (or equal to) the well respected Aperion or Ascend offerings for $1000? If so, many of us have been giving bad advice!
Not terribly familiar with either, so I looked at both those websites.
I would not put money against the the 362 in a controlled test, vs anything either of those offer. The key being controlled testing, not anecdote.
Who knows how much inference can be made about the P362 from the P162 bookshelf speakers? I'd assume the drivers may be the same(?). The P162's performed well, but were not standouts in this "shoot-out".
http://www.audioholics.com/reviews/speakers/bookshelf/budget-bookshelf-shootout-2009
None. They seem to share the same woofer and tweeter, but, there is no mid on the two way 162. So they attempt to match the directional characteristics of a small piston (3/4" dome) to a larger piston (6.5" woofer), without the benefit of an in between diameter driver (4" mid in the 362). You can see the result, horizontally and vertically:
162
360/362
There is also less smoothness in the direct on axis, due most likely to different diffraction signatures of the baffles/driver arrangement and XO filter (not sure about the rise above 10k).
162
360/362
The P362's certainly seem to offer a sweetspot in full-range speaker value!
It's a well executed design, for the price, from what data that is available/I have seen, it's unique.
The next question is how much more do you need to spend to get a significantly better speaker?
Define "better"?

. For monopolar, vertically stacked driver box speakers, probably quite a bit, though you can get more output, lower LF performance. etc.
Some box speakers like KEF, with their coincident drivers, might give it a run for it's money (but cost more) and may exceed it in the spatial reproduction aspect.
Magneplanar has a model for around the same list price that may sound better (2 ch stereo) to some, in some areas, not as good in others. It all depends.
cheers,
AJ