Interesting. I thought I remembered WmAx or Andrew saying in one of the Kappa build threads that the 12.1 would work in the VQ box. Just out of curiousity, do you which paramters cause the responses to be so different?
Kappa perfect VQ
Fs = 22.9 Hz
Qms = 10.29
Vas = 96.43 liters
Cms = 0.323 mm/N
Mms = 176.4 g
Rms = 2.398 kg/s
Xmax = 16.75 mm
Xmech = 25.13 mm
P-Dia = 250 mm
Sd = 491 sq.cm
P-Vd = 0.822 liters
--Electrical Parameters--
Qes = 0.79
Re = 4.42 ohms
Le = 1.14 mH
Z = 4 ohms
BL = 11.92 Tm
Pe = 400 watts
--Electromech. Parameters--
Qts = 0.74
no = 0.141 %
1-W SPL = 83.65 dB
2.83-V SPL = 89 dB
Page Two -- Kappa Perfect VQ
Kappa perfect 12.1
Fs = 23.32 Hz
Qms = 10.28
Vas = 83.28 liters
Cms = 0.208 mm/N
Mms = 224 g
Xmax = 14.15 mm
Sd = 531 sq.cm
--Electrical Parameters--
Qes = 0.46
Re = 4 ohms
Le = 3.05 mH
Z = 4 ohms
BL = 16.9 Tm
Pe = 350 watts
--Electromech. Parameters--
Qts = 0.44
2.83-V SPL = 96 dB
Look at Qt and CMS. For a good sealed driver you need a heavy cone and a very floppy suspension.
So you want a high Qts, a highly compliant suspension and low Fs for a good sealed driver.
The best index of compliance is VAS, which is the volume of air with the same "springyness" as the driver suspension. Qt is a combination of electrical and mechanical Q.
You can get an idea of the suitability of a driver for sealed or vented performance by dividing Fs by Qes. The closer the number to 100 more the driver is best used vented. The closer to 50 the more suitable it is for sealed alignment. For sealed the lower the better.
So the kappa VQ no insert is 22.9/0.79 = 29
Kappa perfect 12.1 23.32/0.46 = 50.
So both the above drivers a best in a sealed enclosure, but the VQ no insert is by far the superior driver in a sealed enclosure.