Interesting...
Your link doesn't work but I was able to drag this up.
The funny thing is that the red link at the bottom of the article doesn't work, either! I posted te text of my likk here, just in case it disappears.
"Ford and the United Auto Workers are set to begin new contract talks under a set of circumstances radically different from any previously faced by either party. There is the "minor" matter of the union's ownership stakes in General Motors and Chrysler that arose in the wake of those two companies' government-engineered bankruptcy filings, accomplished with more than a little rule-bending by the Obama administration and its car czars.
But you wouldn't learn about any of this, let alone its potential effect on negotiations, from reading coverage of the situation by the Associated Press's Kimberly Johnson. Additionally,
there's quite a bit of emphasis on the idea that Ford can supposedly afford to be more generous with pay and benefits than its two major Detroit rivals. How convenient -- for the union and the the other two companies.
Here are key paragraphs from Johnson's very incomplete report:" Gone, like a train...
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2009/08/31/ap-coverage-ford-uaw-negotiations-ignores-unions-ownership-interest-comp
I wonder if one of the new czars has a hand in this withholding of information?