I own 8 and 9 gen Elites one, 768 and one 1080. For th record I think the 1150 does better overall with my HD programing. With Bluray no question that the 141 is better. My point with the pannys comes from Michael Fermer and the hd guru.
http://hdguru.com/the-new-king-of-hdtv-displays-panasonics-tc-p54v10-reviewed/458/
I wouldnt take a non elite or 8gen Elite over the V series panny. I have alot of time vested in both displays with ISF and know there full range and thats what Im basing the recomendation on.
You may be right re: non-Elites, I have not seen any myself that have been calibrated with ControlCAl. But I've read a lot of very positive outcomes.
I was only offering an option.
Panasonic has improved significantly this time around (in gamma range also) but still has a slight deficiency in color accuracy. That 'difference' is not great mind you, I think the pannys have an excellent picture.
For now, personal taste would pick Samsung or Panasonic, with Kuro still on top. For those on the fence, the great track record of reliability of Panasonic could win them over.
You can see the results here including the calibration data from the shoot out at VE (in the comments section). The numbers don't lie. Panny for black level, Samsung for color accuracy, and Kuro for the best of both IMO.
www.tweaktv.com
I think the above results were very predictable, I thought what was
most interesting were the results of the Toshiba LCD. (on the downside, the poor performance of the Sony, even for an LCD).
Hell, you can still get 50" of Kuro bliss for $2K in a KRP panel and only be missing a tuner. Probably the way I would go today (while they last).