You are probably not the most demanding videophile, but it's loaded with DNR. I have a friend who is a huge fan of westerns, and most particularly on my system, and I refused to watch it at my place. I asked to watch the first few minutes of this title on a DLP, and this may be the first time ever that I saw extremely obvious DNR of an outdoor scenic shot, during the opening. As soon as I saw that, I knew it was going to be bad news.
It's too bad, because it's a good movie. I do believe that DNR could be a good thing, used very sparingly. There are still obvious flaws in the master, and how much they removed with excessive DNR can only be guessed, but my guess in this case is that there is way too much removal of film detail, way too often.
YMMV.