Turntable rec? (as stock, no mods)

J

jostenmeat

Audioholic Spartan
Hey guys, I did use the search function, and have read through a couple of threads. I am guessing the budget for this will be roughly $500. I am trying to advise an older retired gentleman in building a new stereo system. He has literally hundreds of classical music vinyls.

Since he knows nothing about modern day consumer electronics, and is really too busy with renovations to his town home to do any real research on this stuff, I feel very uncomfortable in recommending modifications to him. Reliability and ease of use are pretty high on the list. I myself know absolutely nothing regarding TTs.

So, what would guys recommend for roughly $500 without modification? If it might help you in your recommendation for me/him, he did say this to me in his last email:

For me, the musical (compositional) content and interpretation in the recording are primary; the degree of fidelity is somewhat secondary.
THANKS!


Is this the choice?
http://www.amazon.com/Technics-SL-1200MK2-TECHNICS-Turntable/dp/B00006I5VX/ref=pd_bxgy_e_text_c

"3db" is not so crazy about it? I can appreciate high-fidelity, but I don't want my friend to all of a sudden think that all of his vinyls suck. Maybe HF roll-off is a good thing in this case. Then again, he's probably old enough where he can't hear that high anyways...
 
Last edited:
M

markw

Audioholic Overlord
"Reliability and ease of use are pretty high on the list."

Does he realize that 99.9% of modern turntables are totally manual? That means he'll have to put the needle on to play it and take it off in about 20 minutes or so.

Automatics are out there, but they are either extremely "inexpensive" but decent ones are out there too.

I know Thorens makes a nice belt drive that comes in a little above the $500 limit: http://www.audioadvisor.com/prodinfo.asp?number=THTD190

Of course, if a fully manual turntable works for him, there's a plethora of choices around that level.
 
3db

3db

Audioholic Slumlord
Hey guys, I did use the search function, and have read through a couple of threads. I am guessing the budget for this will be roughly $500. I am trying to advise an older retired gentleman in building a new stereo system. He has literally hundreds of classical music vinyls.

Since he knows nothing about modern day consumer electronics, and is really too busy with renovations to his town home to do any real research on this stuff, I feel very uncomfortable in recommending modifications to him. Reliability and ease of use are pretty high on the list. I myself know absolutely nothing regarding TTs.

So, what would guys recommend for roughly $500 without modification? If it might help you in your recommendation for me/him, he did say this to me in his last email:



THANKS!


Is this the choice?
http://www.amazon.com/Technics-SL-1200MK2-TECHNICS-Turntable/dp/B00006I5VX/ref=pd_bxgy_e_text_c

"3db" is not so crazy about it? I can appreciate high-fidelity, but I don't want my friend to all of a sudden think that all of his vinyls suck. Maybe HF roll-off is a good thing in this case. Then again, he's probably old enough where he can't hear that high anyways...
The Technics turntable is a solid turntable with a fairly good tone arm. His music will sound good with this. I was opposed to the generalizations inferred by WMAX that turntables in the $500-$600 range from the likes of Project, Rega, and Music Hall are nothing but junk. The tonearm on my Project XPressionII is a much better tonearm than teh Technics. Its not that the Technics is a bad tone arm. Its that the Project XpressionII tonearm is just better. If he can get the Xpression II for $400 or the Technics for between $200 or $300, he's getting a good turntable.
 
TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Seriously, I have no life.
Hey guys, I did use the search function, and have read through a couple of threads. I am guessing the budget for this will be roughly $500. I am trying to advise an older retired gentleman in building a new stereo system. He has literally hundreds of classical music vinyls.

Since he knows nothing about modern day consumer electronics, and is really too busy with renovations to his town home to do any real research on this stuff, I feel very uncomfortable in recommending modifications to him. Reliability and ease of use are pretty high on the list. I myself know absolutely nothing regarding TTs.

So, what would guys recommend for roughly $500 without modification? If it might help you in your recommendation for me/him, he did say this to me in his last email:



THANKS!


Is this the choice?
http://www.amazon.com/Technics-SL-1200MK2-TECHNICS-Turntable/dp/B00006I5VX/ref=pd_bxgy_e_text_c

"3db" is not so crazy about it? I can appreciate high-fidelity, but I don't want my friend to all of a sudden think that all of his vinyls suck. Maybe HF roll-off is a good thing in this case. Then again, he's probably old enough where he can't hear that high anyways...
What are his musical tastes? If he has a large classical collection is budget is too low. Avoid automatic turntables.
 
MidnightSensi

MidnightSensi

Audioholic Samurai
Technics 1210. (1200 is silver, 1210 is black)

I've tried a lot of different turntables, and have always found this turntable to be the best for everything. It's built like a tank, sounds great, looks classic (is classic).
 
J

jostenmeat

Audioholic Spartan
Thanks so much for your replies, everyone.

Does he realize that 99.9% of modern turntables are totally manual? That means he'll have to put the needle on to play it and take it off in about 20 minutes or so.

Automatics are out there, but they are either extremely "inexpensive" but decent ones are out there too.
Mark, I will ask him what his opinion might be about automatic. Convenience is hard to overrate at times.

The Technics turntable is a solid turntable with a fairly good tone arm. His music will sound good with this. I was opposed to the generalizations inferred by WMAX that turntables in the $500-$600 range from the likes of Project, Rega, and Music Hall are nothing but junk. The tonearm on my Project XPressionII is a much better tonearm than teh Technics. Its not that the Technics is a bad tone arm. Its that the Project XpressionII tonearm is just better. If he can get the Xpression II for $400 or the Technics for between $200 or $300, he's getting a good turntable.
Thanks very much for your clarification, 3db!

What are his musical tastes? If he has a large classical collection is budget is too low. Avoid automatic turntables.
100% classical. A bit of everything, but orchestral is his thing. He received his doctorate in conducting at Cincinnati several decades ago. He's been on a Mahler kick. I lent him my Beethoven cycle that I asked you some questions about, and he listened to the entire set so quickly. I'm still procrastinating on listening to some Handel he lent me, a certain recording he raves about.

You say to avoid automatic turntables, because of your somewhat extreme paranoia of today's manufacturing standards?

At what budget do you think he could find a quality TT in your eyes? Say that, somehow, I got him to double the budget to $1k. (I wish I could define the budget better, but he's been somewhat elusive about that with me). So far, he's already balked at $3k for speakers and/or sub. My guess there, for that particular budget, is probably half of that. In the end, I'm not sure I can get myself to advise him in spending as much on a TT as the actual speakers.

OTOH, I have a feeling he really loves his vinyl collection, and maybe he can be convinced. As he knows nothing about this stuff, I'm sure he doesn't share the same opinion that I have whereby the greatest portion of the budget, by far, should go to the speakers, and room treatments.

The setup will be in his library (presently being worked on) with a grand piano taking up most of the left area. All of the electronics will actually be in an adjacent room where the TV is.

Technics 1210. (1200 is silver, 1210 is black)

I've tried a lot of different turntables, and have always found this turntable to be the best for everything. It's built like a tank, sounds great, looks classic (is classic).
Good to know. Appreciated.
 
TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Seriously, I have no life.
Mark, I will ask him what his opinion might be about automatic. Convenience is hard to overrate at times.



Thanks very much for your clarification, 3db!



100% classical. A bit of everything, but orchestral is his thing. He received his doctorate in conducting at Cincinnati several decades ago. He's been on a Mahler kick. I lent him my Beethoven cycle that I asked you some questions about, and he listened to the entire set so quickly. I'm still procrastinating on listening to some Handel he lent me, a certain recording he raves about.

You say to avoid automatic turntables, because of your somewhat extreme paranoia of today's manufacturing standards?

At what budget do you think he could find a quality TT in your eyes? Say that, somehow, I got him to double the budget to $1k. (I wish I could define the budget better, but he's been somewhat elusive about that with me). So far, he's already balked at $3k for speakers and/or sub. My guess there, for that particular budget, is probably half of that. In the end, I'm not sure I can get myself to advise him in spending as much on a TT as the actual speakers.

OTOH, I have a feeling he really loves his vinyl collection, and maybe he can be convinced. As he knows nothing about this stuff, I'm sure he doesn't share the same opinion that I have whereby the greatest portion of the budget, by far, should go to the speakers, and room treatments.

The setup will be in his library (presently being worked on) with a grand piano taking up most of the left area. All of the electronics will actually be in an adjacent room where the TV is.



Good to know. Appreciated.
For what he wants to play, I would recommend this project turntable.

I would definitely recommend upgrading to the Ortofon 2M Bronze. If he can stretch to it, see if they will upgrade you to the 2M black.

He will be happy with this rig.

Automatic turntables never where any good, no matter what the vintage.

They treat records roughly and there is far too much mechanism for the arm to move about.

The great Gilbert Briggs founder of Wharfedale, used to say the "whoever invented the record auto changer must have wandered into the audio industry via the bicycle industry!" And that was in the fifties.
 
M

markw

Audioholic Overlord
The great Gilbert Briggs founder of Wharfedale, used to say the "whoever invented the record auto changer must have wandered into the audio industry via the bicycle industry!" And that was in the fifties.
I think technology has advanced somewhat since then. For instance, I don't see idler wheel drive anymore, either. Likewise, automatic transmissions and air conditioning in cars are pretty good nowadays, too.
 
TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Seriously, I have no life.
I think technology has advanced somewhat since then. For instance, I don't see idler wheel drive anymore, either. Likewise, automatic transmissions and air conditioning in cars are pretty good nowadays, too.
Not for turntables it hasn't. In the digital age there is misunderstanding about turntables. Turntables require the most perfect bearings that it is possible turn. There is no such thing as an over engineered turntable or pickup arm bearing. The last thing any pickup arm needs to be encumbered with is an added function.

Unlike digital gear, in turntables there is definite and noticeable improvement all the way up the food chain so to speak. If you can afford it a $45,000 SME turntable will bring improvement, unlike an exotic CD player.
 
M

markw

Audioholic Overlord
I honestly think you're suffering from dogma. Some things may have been true in the past and may have been valid then, but have since become untrue, yet the belief continues. Such things as pork being unclean, (and it was in Biblical times) and no consuming oysters in months without and "R" in them (but refrigeration had obviated that) and that automatic turntables (not changers, mind you) are inherently inferior to pure manuals.

In Brigg's day,, turntables were crude devices and all he did is admit to the truth. I wonder what he would say were he alive today?
 
Swerd

Swerd

Audioholic Warlord
In Brigg's day, turntables were crude devices and all he did is admit to the truth. I wonder what he would say were he alive today?
I don't believe there has been any new R&D for turntable design since the 1970s when it became clear that CDs were going to take over the industry. Because the technology for turntables, as well as MM and MC pickups, is largely as it was 30 years ago, what was true then is still true today.
 
M

markw

Audioholic Overlord
A lesson in context.

The great Gilbert Briggs founder of Wharfedale, used to say the "whoever invented the record auto changer must have wandered into the audio industry via the bicycle industry!" And that was in the fifties.
Please note the original quote referenced a changer, not an automatic turntable. "The great Gilbert Briggs founder of Wharfedale" should not be quoted out of context simply to try to make a point.

...and also please note the stated date of the quote.

For a look at what passed for record playing equipment (and hi-fi in general) when he made that comment, check out this site :http://www.radioshackcatalogs.com/

I don't believe there has been any new R&D for turntable design since the 1970s when it became clear that CDs were going to take over the industry. Because the technology for turntables, as well as MM and MC pickups, is largely as it was 30 years ago, what was true then is still true today.
Actually, between the late 50's and into the early 80's, I'd say significant improvements in the playing of vinyl occurred. That's at least two decades! Are you saying no improvments in the playback of vinyl took place in that time?


Let's be reasonable here. Granted, there are some pretty cheap ones out there, but that doesn't mean pretty durn good ones don't exist.
 
Last edited:
J

jostenmeat

Audioholic Spartan
TLS Guy, thank you very much for the recommendation. I've passed it along. We are hoping to meet sometime next week, depending on my schedule.

Otherwise, I appreciate the discussion regarding automatics/changers vs manual. As for the pertinence to the OP's desires, I do not know yet. :rolleyes:

Carry on. :)

Thanks again. :D
 
MidnightSensi

MidnightSensi

Audioholic Samurai
I don't believe there has been any new R&D for turntable design since the 1970s when it became clear that CDs were going to take over the industry. Because the technology for turntables, as well as MM and MC pickups, is largely as it was 30 years ago, what was true then is still true today.
There has been some r&d, mostly for DJing use though. The good news is what makes a good DJ turntable (consistanty, pitch holding, motor strength, isolation) also makes a good audiophile turntable. Technics and Stanton are the brands I would consider for a turntable. But what made a good turntable in the 70s still works now, its just the tried and true decks have lasted through the times.
 
TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Seriously, I have no life.
I honestly think you're suffering from dogma. Some things may have been true in the past and may have been valid then, but have since become untrue, yet the belief continues. Such things as pork being unclean, (and it was in Biblical times) and no consuming oysters in months without and "R" in them (but refrigeration had obviated that) and that automatic turntables (not changers, mind you) are inherently inferior to pure manuals.

In Brigg's day,, turntables were crude devices and all he did is admit to the truth. I wonder what he would say were he alive today?
In Briggs day turntables were not all crude devices. I'm still using a couple of Garrard 301s from that era.



People pay an absolute fortune for those Garrard 301s on eBay. Loricraft remain a profitable company restoring 301s and 401s and now building the Garrard 501.

Sugden, Thorens, Garrard and Perpetuum Ebner, to name just a few made superbly engineered turntables.

There is a modern hubris, that thinks equipment from a bygone era was no good. Far from it.

In fact I'm not highly enamored of modern precision engineering, so much of it is not pretty at all.

This is not just audio. I have two vintage tractors here, that are in constant use. One is 61 years old the other 51 years old. The standard of machining is far and above most of it being produced now. All the threads are perfectly tapped, and threads do not bind or strip. Even after this time, they are more reliable than the modern equivalents.

I have a colleague who bought an expensive modern tractor for his lake place, not JD, but New Holland. He asked me how I got such nice road grades. So I went out to give him instruction. I could not get a good grade either. The hydraulics were terrible, stiff and jerky. Not even close to the performance of the powertrol on my 1948 JD Model A, and a far cry from the hydraulic Touchomatic control on my 51 year old JD 420.

The engine torque curves were in the wrong range, like most modern engines. All around this unit no were near as nice to use as either of mine.

I personally think that manufactured goods on the whole started going to hell in a hand basket during the sixties and has not improved.

Nothing would lead me to believe that an auto changer of any vintage would not put you on a fast track to the destruction of your record collection.

LP grooves are delicate, very delicate, and a pickup arm should never be encumbered with moving extraneous mechanism.
 
M

markw

Audioholic Overlord
I see you're still talking auto changers, not automatic turntables and bringing tractors into the discussion here brings a new style of levity to this forum.

I guess the difference escapes you. :rolleyes:

And, yes, record playing devices were ALL crude in the 50's compared to todays offerings, even today's budget turntables and price-weighted for inflation.

People love and restore '57 Chevys and they are great cars, but to say they are the Technical equivalent of a newer car is folly. They enjoy them for what they are. A nice old car. Likewise, you can enjoy your 301's, but to say they are better than a newer, more technically advanced unit is sheer folly. They use idler wheels, fercheezussake.

Heck, some people freeze-dry their beloved pets and display them when their time on this earth is up, too.
 
Last edited:
TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Seriously, I have no life.
I see you're still talking auto changers, not automatic turntables and bringing tractors into the discussion here brings a new style of levity to this forum.

I guess the difference escapes you. :rolleyes:

And, yes, record playing devices were ALL crude in the 50's compared to todays offerings, even today's budget turntables and price-weighted for inflation.

People love and restore '57 Chevys and they are great cars, but to say they are the Technical equivalent of a newer car is folly. They enjoy them for what they are. A nice old car. Likewise, you can enjoy your 301's, but to say they are better than a newer, more technically advanced unit is sheer folly. They use idler wheels, fercheezussake.

Heck, some people freeze-dry their beloved pets and display them when their time on this earth is up, too.
Actually back then the engineers were able to make superb idler wheel turntables and tape decks for that matter.

Take a look at this Loricraft site.

I can vouch for the fact that everything they say about those Garrard turntables is true.

The fact is those Garrard 301s and 401s are better, much better than the majority of today's turntables, certainly any costing less than $2000 less arm and cartridge.

One of the great things about this studio, is the ability to show fine vintage engineering in the best of lights. When I play one of those 301s people are amazed at the quality. Even if I use a 60s vintage Decca cartridge people are just blown away.

The same goes for tape. The Ferrograph, Brenell and Vortexion decks had excellent speed stability and they used idler wheel technology.

I made superb master recordings with this deck and it uses idler wheel drive. It is the top one with the brushed stainless deck fascia.



If I play a real time two track stereo tape from the fifties on that machine again people are shocked at how little things have actually improved from a sonic point of view.

I have to say that decline in basic engineering standards has more than a little to do with our current economic mess.

I just read an article about the fact that our trains are much slower than 50 to 70 years ago.

When I visited San Francisco, I was impressed by the fact that the cable car system developed in 1875 came in ahead of schedule and below budget.

I looked at those overloaded cars on steep slopes, and was amazed at their safety record. If the problem had been given to a modern engineers, they would most likely said it was not possible. If they had attempted it, I feel certain they would have got themselves on CNN Breaking News and probably be the subject of a congressional inquiry.

When I went around the cable station, I was overwhelmed by the attention paid to safety and how elegant fail safe mechanisms had been built into the design. The gear case pulling the cars up those steep hills, had the inscription, "Philadelphia Gear Company" 1903. Now I ask you what of modern manufacture will be working day after day and hour after hour over a 100 years later?

On the day I left the lead article in the Newspaper was about a light rail line of about 27 miles, that was late, way over budget and kept breaking down. Now an electric railway, is a very simple engineering task.

And another thing, our forebears could bury these railway lines underground where they don't interfere with traffic and create noise. Now apparently we can't.

The fact is there is a huge amount of modern technology that is just plain awful and worse than what went before. I see examples again and again.

I can assure you that a Garrard 301 or 401 is a fine turntable, and no allowances need to be made for age. People paying large sums for them on eBay, and yes paying more than the sums generally talked about on these forums for turntables, are getting value for money. They are buying pieces of superb precision engineering that performs its intended task, which is timeless.

By the way I have just checked my 1968 Hi-Fi Year Book, and a Garrard 401 cost 25 pounds, five shillings and ten pence. An SME 3009 series two improved would have cost you 17 pounds, 17 shillings and six pence. An Ortofon SPU-E would have cost you 18 pounds and five shillings. A Decca ffss Mk 4 SHE would have cost 25 pounds 19 shillings.
 
Last edited:
M

markw

Audioholic Overlord
And I'll put that turntable up against one of today's turntables. What I find surprising and a bit disconcerting is your dismissal of any significant advances in technology since the fifties, particularly since I think you're a doctor. Does your disdain for modern tech extend to that field as well, or do you make an exception there?

I stlll see a freeze-dried cat in your future.
 
Last edited:
WmAx

WmAx

Audioholic Samurai
While TLS Guy is correct about turntables being very sensitive to mechanical quality and engineering, I do disagree that one has to spend $45k to get an essentially neutral(as neutral as a TT can get, anyways) turntable system. From what can discern, if you pick very wisely, you can get a superbly engineered table that has near ideal performance at about the $2k-$3k range. But I believe that subjective interpretation is just as alive in the world of turntables as it is cables or any other audio device. So it's easy to understand how someone might think a $45k table has some special 'sound'; it's basic human psychology.

As for improvement to modern turntables: yes, there are definite improvements. Modern arm designs are superior for certain. Most arms, even the high dollar ones, used to be highly resonant. Today you can acquire arms with very low resonance and incredibly low mechanical losses, thanks to computer aided design/analysis.

The most sophisticated/nuetral turntable ever was probably the mid to late 80's Denon industrial reference machine, of which I forget the model number at the moment.... it was designed as a mastering/archive reference machine. It had a CPU controlled arm system that actively cancelled all vibrations with counter-acting built in actuators and had additional servos to compensate for warping, tracking forces, etc. This table in the 80's cost around $10k, which would be over $20k inflation adjusted for today. It was the pinnacle of Japanese research/engineering condensed into a single product. I don't think anything built today is nearly as sophisticated. This was NOT an audiophile machine. It was a professional audio product. It was ugly; it had no special cosmetics. It looked like a purely industrial product/tool; which of course it was.

-Chris
 
Last edited:
3db

3db

Audioholic Slumlord
For what he wants to play, I would recommend this project turntable.

I would definitely recommend upgrading to the Ortofon 2M Bronze. If he can stretch to it, see if they will upgrade you to the 2M black.

He will be happy with this rig.

Automatic turntables never where any good, no matter what the vintage.

They treat records roughly and there is far too much mechanism for the arm to move about.

The great Gilbert Briggs founder of Wharfedale, used to say the "whoever invented the record auto changer must have wandered into the audio industry via the bicycle industry!" And that was in the fifties.
I can atest to TLS recommedation as I have the previous version, the Xpression II which has teh same tonearm as the XpressionIII. Its a great table and with the acrylic platter , (mine being heavy steel), it should run even quieter than mine. I can't here any rumble from mine now and only when I'm very exhuberent with teh volume knob do I detect some. But once teh music starts, I have to turn it down again as its too loud. :D
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top