??
Given the cost of the stand alone coax loki driver, is there a cheaper replacement that won't adversely affect performance? You would think there is a similar driver without the tweeter built into it.
I have searched and searched for a driver, with close TS parameters, to avoid using a coaxial for the fill driver. I have not found one that can match the all important VAS, Fs, Qt and sensitivity. One of the things that makes that driver unusual is the low Fs for the size of driver.
There are lots of good PP drivers out there, but then you need a different line. The SEAS are the only decent OEM line of coaxial speakers.
If you don't use a coaxial, then you end up with the horizontal MTM, which is something to avoid. The other solution is a three way, but then you need a mid range driver with a large bandwidth, that can be crossed over at 400 Hz and 4 kHz, so you don't have drivers separated in space, crossed over in the speech discrimination band. You then have a costly mid range unit, and three other drivers besides, with a costly three way crossover.
The other problem is that you end up with a closed chamber for the mid range within the line. If you make a standard ported enclosure, you can correct the step response with a different driver, by having the drivers in isolated compartments, but that is obviously not practical for a TL.
I will bug SEAS again and try and persuade them to make the driver without the tweeter, to use to correct the step response.