Ahhhh…so that’s how to you “thank” people – I was wondering about that.
The reason I ask is because if I upgrade to a projector that has HDMI and Component inputs and I choose to run the 1080p blueray and 1080i hd dvd player’s video signal through my Onkyo 605 with hdmi, then a hdmi cable to the projector, I heard that receivers in general never do a great job of video pass-thru.
Here are some snippets from a cnet review about the onkyo 605’s video:
“The most disappointing aspect of the TX-SR605's video performance is that it either lacks or has poor 2:3 pull-down processing.”
“We also noticed that the TX-SR605 was softening the resolution of images that it deinterlaced; this was confirmed on the HQV test disc as well. . In areas where there should have been detail, there was just a solid color. On the other hand, the TX-SR605 did a very good job with several other tests on the HQV test suite, including tests with a rotating white line, three pivoting fingers, and footage of a waving flag.”
“While the video performance of the TX-SR605 was disappointing, in our experience subpar video processing by AV receivers is common. We've mentioned it in reviews of the Sony STR-DA5200ES, the Yamaha RX-V1700, and the Pioneer VSX-82TXS. The irony is that the more receivers take advantage of the single-cable HDMI convenience, the more important proper video processing becomes. For example, you can bypass much of the processing in the TX-SR605 by running a separate cable for component video and changing the input on the TV when using analog sources.”
Maybe the difference comes down to personal visual feeling and convenience (not unplugging/plugging component cables from different players all the time)