sealed subwoofers better than all ported subs with music?

mike c

mike c

Audioholic Warlord
One Gotham would smash the whole set...and for about the same price. (Not to mention 1/10 of the headache of proper positioning). I'll quit arguing with you (however I do enjoy it). You did fail to respond to the fact that JL makes their own amplifers, drivers, and boxes. SVS slaps some wood together and rocks some Korean drivers. If only sound quality were 100% depenent on the cabient, SVS would dominate all! If SVS built a 3000 dollar sub, they still wouldn't have the benefit of millions of dollars of research and engineering that JL audio does. How many patents do the drivers on the SVS subs have...? I'd estimate zero. Silly me thinking audio engineers could create a better product than cabient makers! Buy your subs from a carpenter, I'll stick with a legit audio manufacturer. Rock on!
and it would also cost a lot more.

the only arguments you have made are:
1) JL makes their own drivers, therefore they're the best subwoofer manufacturer
2) patents add to the sound quality of a subwoofer

good for a laugh, no we were not arguing. you were being pwned.

who gives a &*#$ who makes their own drivers or amps. as long as the amps or drivers meet certain requirements, that's that.
 
Last edited:
Tarub

Tarub

Senior Audioholic


This is hip hop my hood engineering marvel. ;) ROCK ON bro.
 
mike c

mike c

Audioholic Warlord
You didn't know this? How long have you been posting here? LOL:D;)
my bad. :)

im sure the guy on the quadmobile has some patents on his invention/creation ... therefore its better than the gotham because its mobile. "JL Audio Mobile TM" ... or is that taken already? :rolleyes:
 
ErinH

ErinH

Audioholic General
I'm curious just how close the Gotham & Fathom are to the w7...

I just picked up a 12w6 for my car early this week. $130 shipped, hehe.

I'm about to pull the 12w7 and save it for potential theater use.


I did think the OP's quote was pretty funny, but the dude sounds like the typical JL bandwagon guy. JL's products are great, but for their MSRP there are many more options worth exploring.
 
J

Johnd

Audioholic Samurai
I'm curious just how close the Gotham & Fathom are to the w7...

I just picked up a 12w6 for my car early this week. $130 shipped, hehe.

I'm about to pull the 12w7 and save it for potential theater use.


I did think the OP's quote was pretty funny, but the dude sounds like the typical JL bandwagon guy. JL's products are great, but for their MSRP there are many more options worth exploring.
Me too. :)

Specs and data are great...but only go so far. Of course one wants a quality product at a great price...but that's not the only consideration for subs. Setup and room acoustics (possibly treatments) all enter into the fray. I've heard people bash the servo 15, yet I'm awed by its accuracy, and, when I want, also by its reach (WOTW, LOTR, M&C, etc.). I can shake the walls with that one sub...I generally don't like that. But on the rare occasion... :D Fathom, Gotham Earthquake, etc. All great in their own rights. I like my servo 15. I must admit, it never dawned on me to place it on a cart. :p
 
codexp3

codexp3

Audioholic
and it would also cost a lot more.

the only arguments you have made are:
1) JL makes their own drivers, therefore they're the best subwoofer manufacturer
2) patents add to the sound quality of a subwoofer

good for a laugh, no we were not arguing. you were being pwned.

who gives a &*#$ who makes their own drivers or amps. as long as the amps or drivers meet certain requirements, that's that.

Your counter calim is that research means nothing? Why aren't you living in a cave protesting the advent of fire? I don't recall one major publication calling the SVS sub the best sub ever made. Sterophile, Hometheater mag, Ultimate AV have all given that title to JL. I'd love to come listen to the mud that comes from your array of subs. I hate to break it to you but must legit speaker manufacturers make their own drivers with the exception of Wilson. The only thing anyone should own that's made in a garage in Ohio is a Honda.

Here's a qutoe and link for you I've got a million of them:
"As for sound, the JL played deeper, louder, and tighter than the SVS with any material I chose. But this statement doesn’t apply only to the SVS PB12-Plus/2; it applies to every other active sub I’ve heard, at any price. The JL Audio Fathom f113 has become my new reference subwoofer."

http://www.hometheatersound.com/equipment/jl_fathom_f113.htm
 
avaserfi

avaserfi

Audioholic Ninja
Your counter calim is that research means nothing? Why aren't you living in a cave protesting the advent of fire? I don't recall one major publication calling the SVS sub the best sub ever made. Sterophile, Hometheater mag, Ultimate AV have all given that title to JL. I'd love to come listen to the mud that comes from your array of subs. I hate to break it to you but must legit speaker manufacturers make their own drivers with the exception of Wilson. The only thing anyone should own that's made in a garage in Ohio is a Honda.

Here's a qutoe and link for you I've got a million of them:
"As for sound, the JL played deeper, louder, and tighter than the SVS with any material I chose. But this statement doesn’t apply only to the SVS PB12-Plus/2; it applies to every other active sub I’ve heard, at any price. The JL Audio Fathom f113 has become my new reference subwoofer."

http://www.hometheatersound.com/equipment/jl_fathom_f113.htm

Yes, your research means little to nothing. Subjectivity is the what drives esoteric crap to the top. Learning to read measurements and being able correlating them to human hearing on the other hand is a very valid form of research which Mike offered earlier.

From the same publication:

"Their immediacy is matched by abundant clarity -- a potent combination that makes for very involving, even exciting listening." "Voices and instruments were rendered with almost hyper-real precision and crispness, but this never toppled over into clinical rigidity…. I certainly wouldn't call them "polite" or "laid-back." "Vivid, forceful and athletic" is more like it." "They seemed to know where the line between 'more' and 'too much' resided, and they never crossed it."

What could this be about...? Cables...

I will just ignore the even more ignorant comment about DIY and non-proprietary drivers and amps.

I guess I should point out that I built a sub for less than $600 including amplification that can out perform both the SVS Ultra and the Fathom in virtually every respect within the audible spectrum.
 
Last edited:
J

Johnd

Audioholic Samurai
Your counter calim is that research means nothing? Why aren't you living in a cave protesting the advent of fire? I don't recall one major publication calling the SVS sub the best sub ever made. Sterophile, Hometheater mag, Ultimate AV have all given that title to JL. I'd love to come listen to the mud that comes from your array of subs. I hate to break it to you but must legit speaker manufacturers make their own drivers with the exception of Wilson. The only thing anyone should own that's made in a garage in Ohio is a Honda.

Here's a qutoe and link for you I've got a million of them:
"As for sound, the JL played deeper, louder, and tighter than the SVS with any material I chose. But this statement doesn’t apply only to the SVS PB12-Plus/2; it applies to every other active sub I’ve heard, at any price. The JL Audio Fathom f113 has become my new reference subwoofer."

http://www.hometheatersound.com/equipment/jl_fathom_f113.htm

Whooa. Slow down on the caffeine codexp3. I don't see anywhere in your quote where mike referred to your accusations...and nowhere in your post did you repond to his assertion that it makes no difference who manufactures the driver, provided it is a quality speaker.

I, for the record, agree that it makes no difference who manufactures the driver, provided it is of quality. Cheers, John
 
mike c

mike c

Audioholic Warlord
codexp3, if you looked harder in the same magazines, i'm pretty sure you could find reviews that would say Bose speakers, Magic Pebbles, Snake Cables (made up name), and what not as the best ever things in their areas of audio. i'm thinking you also believe those, don't you?

and for the record, the plus/2 is nowhere near the quality of the SVS ultra I linked. strawman argument. (for you and for the reviewer)
 
Last edited:
mtrycrafts

mtrycrafts

Seriously, I have no life.
Here's a qutoe and link for you I've got a million of them:
url]
Yes, and they are equally subjective:rolleyes: worth that only, being subjective, nothing else. That is the problem with most of the rags out there, too subjective, not enough meat behind them.
 
annunaki

annunaki

Moderator
While the JL W7 and it's derivatives are great subwoofers, there are other subs out there that can sound as good or even better. Claiming that the F113 is the best sub ever is ignorant.

The JL W7 design is now pushing 8 years old. It is quite conceivable someone has one upped the design by now. However, it is impressive that a design, as old as it may be, is still one of the front running drivers available. :D

Based upon dumax testing, the driver itself (W7) is one of the most linear on the market in terms of motor (Bl) and suspension (kms) linearity.

I will be doing a DIY project with the W7 in a vented enclosure for my home. Whenever I get that done, I will let you know what I think.
 
I

InTheIndustry

Senior Audioholic
Guys, ported subs are obviously better. Bose has used the design for over 20 years!

Now, for the serious portion of my post (and please read the whole thing and not just parts of it before commenting)...

I'll start by admitting that yes, I'm a JLAudio home dealer and have owned every sub they currently offer (yes, even the Gotham) as well as a ton of subwoofers from other manufacturers not to mention all of the subwoofers and gear I've installed or demoed over the years. Regardless, I will also say that I am not biased towards one brand or the other. Believe it or not, I change brands that we carry all the time because I want the best for my clients. If someone makes something better, I switch. Period. I'm not on here trying to sell stuff unless it's used demo equipment or a special buy and I'm able to give someone a great deal. I have no reason to carry an ulterior motive in trying to convince people one way or the other. I just still really enjoy the hobby and like to think that some of my posts actually help people. I want to add to this debate (which has, unfortunately, become very personal for some) from my personal experience.

If you have not spent any REAL amount of time with the JLAudio Fathom or Gotham products nor the SVS gear or whatever else people want to throw out there that's comparable, I question how you can really have a dog in this fight. I find it absurd that people, who are supposed to be into finding the best sounding gear, are trying to defend their personal purchases or, worse yet, trying to decide what SOUNDS best by looking at graphs or quoting reviewers. Is that what a hobbyist who's interested in great SOUNDING gear does? Now whether or not it's best sounding for the $ or best sounding regardless of the $ or the best sounding/looking gear is up to the individual. That's what these threads are for. All the time I see & hear gear that looks great on paper and think "Yuk!" or "That's OK" and the opposite happens as well where I'm blown away by a product that seems to exceed "specs".

It's funny, some folks are adamant in their beliefs that many "high-end" shoppers are convinced that different pieces of gear sound better than what they do because of their price tags. Yet, some of these same people haven't thought it all the way through enough to think that consumers aren't also blinded in the same respects by reading spec charts or reviews. You don't think that companies offering so-called "High Value" (meaning unbelievably specced gear for way cheap/er) products have figured out that shoppers (particularly internet shoppers because that's all they have to go with) are wowed by numbers? It goes both ways. You don't think that these numbers can be "achieved" through less than honest or practical means? Come on, wake up! The amplifier/receiver & front projection markets have been doing that to consumers for YEARS and I assure you it's spilled over into speakers & subs.

As for the actual debate on the table: Three things I can promise...
1. There's more than one way to skin a cat. Both designs can be pulled off very well.

2. Ported subs have been around for a long time and are, generally, cheaper to build, design, and manufacture. It’s tried and true. But whether or not the hole(s) in the box are detrimental to sound &/or force or beneficial to it is up to the individual listener.

3. Whether or not a manufacturer actually makes their own pieces or not does not add to their probabilities of a successful product. It could possibly help with quality control. It could also possibly help with speed of production or model updates. But, in my experience as both an A/V integrator and in sales management with an A/V manufacturer, I have learned that, like our design debate, there are benefits and drawbacks to both. For the record, JLAudio does not manufacture their own drivers. Those, along with other parts, are made over seas in Asia if i remember correctly. Infact, now that I think about it, everything might be made and assembled in Asia or the majority of the parts are brought in and they are put in the sub-boxes here. I cannot recall for certain.

Both designs, ported and sealed have design flaws. Speaking in a generality rather than an absolute: I have found ported subs to generally be irritating because of the, for lack of a better word, droning after the action has stopped. They seem to sort of linger and reverberate though the room and that irritates me because I really notice it. This can sometimes be desired, particularly when dealing with a smallish driver. Like an 8". I can understand if more 8" subs than not have ports because that way they can sound bigger than an 8".

Sealed designs take a lot of work to pull off properly. They're more expensive to build as well. A lot of them in the entry level tend to waffle or "chuff" when played loudly which is just as annoying as the drone from the port.

All of this depends on practical evaluation of someone's needs. Big time subs like the SVS ULTRA (Yes I've heard it. A client had us install one in mid '07) & JLAUDIO Fathom are brilliant for different reasons. The SVS is big, loud, very forceful, accurate enough, and reasonably priced. The JLAUDIO Fathom F113 is great because it's smallish, attractive looking, extremely tight/accurate, loud, forceful, self calibrating, and plays much bigger than it looks. A lot of similarities and some differences.

Where the JL excels and the SVS cannot is from an installation stand point: I can put the JL in a normally sized cabinet or built in. I also don't have to worry near as much about any special engineering in the cabinet because the output is front firing and it's sealed. Wives are more likely to be willing to accept it out of a cabinet if need be. I also find that front firing sealed subs, like the JL's are better for music. That's just been my experience, particularly in carpeted rooms.

As far as one always being better than the other, it's always going to depend on the price point and which manufacturers we're putting up against each other. As for the "best"? Well, the JLAUDIO product is really nice, but I would have to say that it will always depend on the application.

*NOTE: For the guy who said he built a sub for $600 and it will blow away the SVS & Fathom: I would like one. I might like a lot more than that if you'd care to make them and sell them to me. Work me up a price for one and I will send you a check. I'm serious. I would absolutely be willing to buy one and try it. I have an F112 as well as many others on hand that will be easy to A/B with.

But, it is true, Bose subwoofers are ported. :)
 
mike c

mike c

Audioholic Warlord
intheindustry,

agreed on the following:
-IMO the JL F113 still holds the crown in being the best subwoofer PER cubic inch
-there is no absolute best and both designs have different tradeoffs

for verification:
-i know it was a joke but, bose being ported has nothing to do with anything really. it's a good icebreaker, but seeing you mentioned it thrice between two posts would seem that you believe that sealed>ported.
-i really did not want to get into objective versus subjective - because I don't have that much experience with that. but I highly doubt our ears are more accurate than calibrated measurement mics whose sole purpose was to present to us consumers with a fair and accurate testing procedure for us to compare and decide which way we want to go be it sealed or ported because like you said, not everyone has the space.
-are you sure the droning you mentioned was not room induced instead of subwoofer induced? (thats why those tests linked here and in the other thread was done ground plane where subwoofer location and room size does not affect the results)

and ultimately, I would like to ask you if you do agree with codex that:
-a sealed subwoofer will sound better than a ported subwoofer - absolutely? (because this is afterall the purpose of this thread - the generalizations made by codex)

i would really like you to buy a/the subwoofer that avaserfi mentioned would beat those mentioned above, if not avaserfi, i'm sure wmax can take up the challenge, i just hope that you would do double blind a/b tests with them. (and also consider, that these are not normal enclosures, so im not sure 600bucks includes the labor they put in) but those are ported mind you, so in effect, you'd actually be testing the two arguments: sealed versus ported and 600 bucks versus 2500 bucks.

http://www.hometheatershack.com/forums/diy-subwoofers/8190-12-infinity-kappa-vq-build-plans.html

do you have better pics of the gotham to share? :) if i had the money, I'd probably get a gotham anyway :) or at least some fathoms.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
mike c

mike c

Audioholic Warlord
im freakin laughing my a&& off, im afraid people here at the office will think im crazy
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top