Those programs are not capable of ripping commercial DVDs containing movies.
Not arguing that, but the discussion isn't illegal if people are simply discussing DVD backup as some may think.
I said exactly this in post 10:
"The illegal part is breaking the CSS copy protection, a necessary step to copy a DVD onto any medium."
A necessary step if the DVD has copy protection and you intend to break it.
There are no "fair use laws" per se. There are "fair use" exceptions to copyright law, but the DMCA's anti-circumvention clause has nothing to do with copyright law.
There is no conflict.
That's absurd. Of course there is conflict when one law - or exception to a law, allows for personal backup as tried in court cases, yet another law circumvents that law. It seems the very definition of conflict.
Kaleidescape's products are licensed by the DVD CCA - the products legally have the right to use the CSS decryption keys because they paid for them. Their products do not violate the DMCA because Kaleidescape's products are licensed for decrypting DVDs.
Correct, yet after legally obtaining permission, the industry went after them anyway. This is a very good indicator that the DMCA, which is backed by the MPAA and RIAA are not about protecting anything more than big brother and not at all the consumer.
But, legally, you have to.
If I use a 1080p projector, and a DVD camcorder I am not... In fact, there are many ways to do this without breaking CSS to backup discs I own. Yet it is still CSS decrypters which are easily the most effective way to make personal copies of discs you own... and I am still unsure of any single lawsuit that has arisen due to this.
Slysoft sure as heck was very public about breaking BD+ on a couple of discs and AACS on all discs. It is hardly the piraters which seem to be targetted by this, and I'm not sure how many private individuals it has hit in regards to online distribution via Torrents. The most obviously hit are those who just want to ensure that when they buy one disc, they aren't jerked around because they have a 3 year old in their home.
I'm also not sure there has been a single reported court case regarding those who choose to act under their right of Fair Use for a personal backup yet are in violation of the DMCA.