Thanks, indeed it does.
But what I can't seem to reconcile is this:
In my short time so far engaging with this hobby (2-channel) in earnest, I have listened to many different interconnects, power cables, speakers and integrated amps---the things I have shelled money out for recently.
I’ve taken stuff home from my local shop—or bought stuff cheap out of curiosity--- without much of an idea of what difference it might make, or if it actually will. This is to say that I try to remain open that changing components may make no difference. My experience has been that things usually
do make a difference.
Let me give a for-instance:
I bought an Audio Quest NRG2 power cable off eBay (got it for $35 new, thank you very much) without really knowing what difference it would make---if any. I had not read anything about the cable and read little about power cables in general.
My experience is that the system sounds different with it in. I have found that when I run my integrated with it, I get a wider and slightly more detailed soundstage and when I swap it over to my CD player, it provides a deeper soundstage. A specific about the detail: When it runs my amp, I can hear Freddy Cole’s saliva/tongue/palate as he prepares his delivery between vocal phrases on his latest CD, “Music, Maestro Please”. This detail cannot be heard when this power cable is anywhere else but in the amp---be it in the CD player or laying on the floor across the room. This detail just disappears.
Similarly, the first time I bi-wired my speakers, I did it in a relative information vacuum yet the difference was clearly discernible, and turned out in to be consistent with common reportage.
Many swaps/tweaks I have done have involved little or no monetary or time investment to fuel expectation either.
The question I have is this
could even be a rhetorical question)
Without carrying specific expectations or mental frontloading into the experience, how or why would my brain contrive two uniquely different sets of listening experiences, and then stick with them, making them repeatable, even with my efforts to dismiss them? And why sometimes would it make up an unpleasant experience? (Our minds do incline toward pleasant, no?)
I have to admit, it leaves me suspecting that we simply have not yet found a way to measure some of these differences.
I say some, because I do not intend to dismiss or discredit the double-blind subjective tests. I fully believe there is a placebo affect sometimes; I just can’t help but think there are other times when there are real differences that we simply do not know how to measure.