Denon 08 series recievers look like poo. So that settles it then
Yeah, I'm not a fan of the Denon look. Still, each to their own.
The Z9 without HDMI is a boat anchor for most of us.
But not to all.
I'd normally agree that it'd be foolish to purchase a receiver so 'old', but given the price you appear to get a Z9 for, I'm not so sure. It may not have HDMI but...
I wouldn't worry to much about HDMI as you can add an external HDMI switcher to anything you want.
Besides, it does have i-link which, whilst it may not pass the latest Dolby/dts formats,
will pass DVD-A/SACD. Moreover, unless you have your room's acoustics sorted, and the overwhelming majority of folk do not - even members on audio enthusiast boards like Audioholics - I'd be wary of suggesting that you'd be missing out on the uncompressed new audio formats over those existing, in terms of sound quality.
Kevinm2, I do agree with others that you'd be better allocating more of your budget to speakers than a receiver as you'll then maximize sound quality on a per dollar basis. However, it's not necessarily that easy. For example, you'd perhaps maximize sound quality even more by buying an amp as opposed to a receiver, except that then you'd be without (a) more than likely a built-in Tuner and (b), a processor for multi-channel audio. Features, therefore, must also be taken into consideration.
At the end of the day only you can determine what you want, what you need and perhaps most importantly, what you're prepared to settle for.
I own a Z9 and I can tell you that it is my pride and joy. It matters not that I use only a fraction of its power and fall short of driving its full complement of 9.2 speakers.