I got them both from my brother and he said 1408 was better than 23 and so did my daughter. We shall see... I am not a big Cusack fan; I like him mostly in his earlier stuff.
1408 was much better than 23. IMO.
Not only was it better than 23, but it is one of the better horror/thriller flicks I have seen in a while.
23 was a tad predictable for me, although it was decent, I certainly agree it is a rental and not for blind buys.
1408, IMO, is also a rental but would be ok as a blind buy.
Hmm, for the fun of it (not that I trust the scores), let's see what IMDB scores them at???
1408 currently at 7.3 out of LOL 24K votes.
http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0450385/
and 23 currently at 6.3 out of 25K votes.
http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0481369/
Meh, I would agree (for the most part) with the votes on 23 but the votes on 1408, I would give it no more than a 7.
Granted, I did say much better than 23, so I would give 23 no more than a 6.
As well, take my reply with a grain of salt, as I am not into horror type flicks.
Out of the 1.7K DVDs currently owned, about 5% are horror type flicks.