Bose Goes HDMI... 4 Years Later

agarwalro

agarwalro

Audioholic Ninja
That is exactly what I was going to ask. Will they use a standard HDMI jack and cable or will it be something proprietary that you must buy directly from Bose?
Even if they do that for the Bose end of the signal, the TV side will always be component or HDMI. Phew.
 
A

autoboy

Audioholic
I think this is a major step back for the Apple of the HT world. No integrated DVD player? That is going to be a big hurdle for people to understand. People buy Bose because it is easy to use, attractive, and sounds good enough. I'm not sure that a simple Bose receiver is what people are looking for. They want the basics integrated into one device with one remote.

You can bash Bose all you want. I do too, but they give the people what they want and are very successful at doing that. Simple sells.
 
j_garcia

j_garcia

Audioholic Jedi
You can bash Bose all you want. I do too, but they give the people what they want and are very successful at doing that. Simple sells.
Let's qualify that: They give people who don't care or don't know any better what they want :D Simple is, as simple does.
 
Davemcc

Davemcc

Audioholic Spartan
I suspect that Bose didn't go HDMI before because they didn't want to pay the license fee to the HDMI license holders. Now that every TV has two or three HDMI slots and Big Box salesmen are pushing HDMI as a feature of the new TV's, I think consumers are questioning why they can't use this HDMI function with the Bose.

HDMI is one of the first things a consumer learns about when they buy a TV nowadays. It's likely consumer pressure that's forcing Bose to use (almost) current technology against it's will.
 
F

FoolintheRain

Enthusiast
I'm not sure about the 2 models you are talking about (V20 and V30), but the Lifestyles 48, 38, and 35 all have HDMI compatabililty and still have the DVD/CD/mp3/AM/FM/hardrive. Just check out their website:) So...
 
highfihoney

highfihoney

Audioholic Samurai
The funny thing is, I also apply the same thinking to Harley owners.

Bose owners tend to have that, "I can't explain it, you wouldn't understand" mentality about their purchase decision.
You guys kill me with your Harley analogies,especially guys who have never ridden or owned a HD,for a bike that so many people love to bash it sure has changed the face of current motorcycling trends over the last 15 years,this fact is undeniable.

There is not one single japanese motorcycle manufacturer that has not blatantly ripped off the styling of a Harley davidson,they even developed a new name for these knock off bikes,they call them "cruisers".

I "can" explain why i Buy HD exclusively & i have owned Japanese bikes also.

1 reason. When i buy a bike i want it to be original,not a tacky looking knock off.

2 reason. I demand that any bike i buy will still be worth a large portion of my investment in 10 years,even after i put 100k miles on the machine.

3 reason. I refuse to buy a bike that in 10 years will look dated,the consistent styling of HD appeals to many who do not crave the latest style,this applies to resale value in a big way.

4 reason, Any bike i buy must be easy to maintain,have access to parts at dealerships well after the 10 year golden rule,parts should also be simple to install with an average tool kit.

If you want to ride a Honda or a Kawasaki thats cool with me but if your going to bash HD on these forums, you'd better have some personal ownership experiences with HD & be prepared to tell us all how & why your current bike is so much better than the HD you used to own,without ownership & side by side comparisons your comment is nothing more than repeating what you hear,repeating wives tales & perpetuating myths is what many non HD owners do.

Explain how & why you equate owning one of the most proven reliable machines ever made with one of the largest rip off products ever made.
 
highfihoney

highfihoney

Audioholic Samurai
You can bash Bose all you want. I do too, but they give the people what they want and are very successful at doing that. Simple sells.
I cant argue with that because its true,the bose corporation is a master at knowing its consumer base & exploiting them,bose buyers want simple stuff that dont take up half the house,stuff that sounds better than the built in sound in their televisions for movies,stuff that the average housewife can hook up.

Its not hard to beat the factory sound from most TV's & bose,even though its 100% junk has done a great job,i cant see the addition HDMI doing anything for them except allow them to use it as a marketing tool,allowing them to still say they are the industry leader in home theater.
 
stratman

stratman

Audioholic Ninja
That's exactly what they'll use it for, marketing. All you need to do is watch one of their commercials (I know, it's hard)and listen for all the catch phrases that they use, it's a text-book case for mass marketing to an apathetic, ignorant consumer base. Keep in mind Bose is not after the audiophile, it's not their market. Bose is 90% marketing (brand recognition) 10% hardware, Hitler once said if you say a lie long enough sooner or later it becomes the truth. Bose doesn't need audiophiles, it's bad business for them, their profit margin would be reduced 70-80%.
 
ParadigmDawg

ParadigmDawg

Audioholic Overlord
lol...I almost responded to the Harley analogies but then I remembered this was audioholics.

I do agree with you though...

You guys kill me with your Harley analogies,especially guys who have never ridden or owned a HD,for a bike that so many people love to bash it sure has changed the face of current motorcycling trends over the last 15 years,this fact is undeniable.

There is not one single japanese motorcycle manufacturer that has not blatantly ripped off the styling of a Harley davidson,they even developed a new name for these knock off bikes,they call them "cruisers".

I "can" explain why i Buy HD exclusively & i have owned Japanese bikes also.

1 reason. When i buy a bike i want it to be original,not a tacky looking knock off.

2 reason. I demand that any bike i buy will still be worth a large portion of my investment in 10 years,even after i put 100k miles on the machine.

3 reason. I refuse to buy a bike that in 10 years will look dated,the consistent styling of HD appeals to many who do not crave the latest style,this applies to resale value in a big way.

4 reason, Any bike i buy must be easy to maintain,have access to parts at dealerships well after the 10 year golden rule,parts should also be simple to install with an average tool kit.

If you want to ride a Honda or a Kawasaki thats cool with me but if your going to bash HD on these forums, you'd better have some personal ownership experiences with HD & be prepared to tell us all how & why your current bike is so much better than the HD you used to own,without ownership & side by side comparisons your comment is nothing more than repeating what you hear,repeating wives tales & perpetuating myths is what many non HD owners do.

Explain how & why you equate owning one of the most proven reliable machines ever made with one of the largest rip off products ever made.
 
N

niget2002

Junior Audioholic
You guys kill me with your Harley analogies,especially guys who have never ridden or owned a HD,for a bike that so many people love to bash it sure has changed the face of current motorcycling trends over the last 15 years,this fact is undeniable.

There is not one single japanese motorcycle manufacturer that has not blatantly ripped off the styling of a Harley davidson,they even developed a new name for these knock off bikes,they call them "cruisers".

I "can" explain why i Buy HD exclusively & i have owned Japanese bikes also.

1 reason. When i buy a bike i want it to be original,not a tacky looking knock off.

2 reason. I demand that any bike i buy will still be worth a large portion of my investment in 10 years,even after i put 100k miles on the machine.

3 reason. I refuse to buy a bike that in 10 years will look dated,the consistent styling of HD appeals to many who do not crave the latest style,this applies to resale value in a big way.

4 reason, Any bike i buy must be easy to maintain,have access to parts at dealerships well after the 10 year golden rule,parts should also be simple to install with an average tool kit.

If you want to ride a Honda or a Kawasaki thats cool with me but if your going to bash HD on these forums, you'd better have some personal ownership experiences with HD & be prepared to tell us all how & why your current bike is so much better than the HD you used to own,without ownership & side by side comparisons your comment is nothing more than repeating what you hear,repeating wives tales & perpetuating myths is what many non HD owners do.

Explain how & why you equate owning one of the most proven reliable machines ever made with one of the largest rip off products ever made.
I hope you're sitting down...

I own a Harley. The bike I had before this one was a Harley. The bike I had before that one was a Kawi. I love my Harley, but to think that a Harley is better than any other bike is plain self-denial... I'll go through your reasoning 1 by 1:

1 reason. When i buy a bike i want it to be original,not a tacky looking knock off. I actually agree with this one. HD makes some of the most beautiful bikes around... but whoever designed the new Rocker needs to be shot (especially the version with the passenger "perch")

2 reason. I demand that any bike i buy will still be worth a large portion of my investment in 10 years,even after i put 100k miles on the machine. I call this reason... denial. Look at current HD resale trends. If your bike is older than an '07, then unless it's old enough to be a classic, you're not going to get maybe half what you paid for it. This holds true for "other" brands too... a used kawi might only get 3k on resale, but it only cost 6-7k new. Dad's '00 Dyna with 70k miles and a 95" big bore barely got him 7k when he resold it... That's a 15k bike with another 2-3k of engine and other add ons.

3 reason. I refuse to buy a bike that in 10 years will look dated,the consistent styling of HD appeals to many who do not crave the latest style,this applies to resale value in a big way.The only reason why an HD bike won't look dated in 10 years is because HD won't change the way their bike looks 10 years from now... This fully has to do with those that buy HD not liking change. Again, I can't really complain with this one, as it's part of the reason I bought my HD too. The V-Rod is a good case in point. Most of the people that buy the V-Rod buy it for it's power and sometimes its looks. Most of these people are also younger, or are recently coming off of sport bikes. I think I've only seen 2 or 3 people older that 35 on a V-Rod.

4 reason, Any bike i buy must be easy to maintain,have access to parts at dealerships well after the 10 year golden rule,parts should also be simple to install with an average tool kit.I do all my own maintenance too... Parts availability is there, but torx bolts suck... Oh, and requiring a special tool to change the shock preload on a bike is stupid. And, I never did find the right tool to change the idle screw on a stock EFI TB... Service techs looked at me like I was an idiot. I ended up having to drill it out and replace with a normal set screw.

Now... the other part of your thread wanted more information about my personal riding experience... I guess this is to prove I'm not just a keyboard commando, so I guess I'll humor you.

I bought my first bike summer of '99 while in college. It was a brand new Kawisaki Vulcan EN 500. I rode it virtually everyday to and from school for the 4 years I was still in college.

In August of '03 I traded it in with 22,000 miles on its clock (I only lived 2 miles from campus) on a 2003 HD Sportster 1200C. I paid 6k for the kawi new, and they gave me a straight up trade in of 1k. The bike at time of trade in needed new front fork seals, new brake pads, and two new tires... Also note, this was the trade in value for a non HD at a HD dealer that immediately resales these bikes to a third party reseller. This bike never went to the dealer after the 1k checkup. Nothing ever broke, and I did all my own maintenance. It also sat in the weather year round on a front porch. The front fork seals went out, not from wear, but because half way through my college career, my sport bike buddies taught me how to wheelie... cruisers aren't designed to wheelie.

In October of 2005 I traded in my sportie for a 2006 HD Nighttrain. The sportie had 21,000 miles on its clock. I bought the sportie new for 10k. It also had 2k worth of add ons. They gave me what I still owed on the note plus about another 700 or so... or about 6k. This was a 4k drop in two years... yeah, HD's hold their resale great. In this time, I also had to have the belt replaced and the ignition module crapped out. This was a beautiful bike that was a blast to ride... I actually miss this bike.

The latest bike passes it's two year birthday this month and has 25k on its clock... It would have another 1-2k, but it sat in a shop for the month of April (while I rode dad's "spare" bike) because a cage thought I didn't deserve to be in the lane I was in and decided to hit me. At 60k miles on bikes, I got to join the "been hit" club. I will say, that for an impact at 20 mph (bike speed prior to braking was 50), the bike only had $3,500 worth of damage... that's pretty good if you ask me.

Now, let's keep talking about HD reliability and quality.

Mom had a 2004 1200 Sportster custom. At 35,000 miles it had a main bearing go out causing the entire engine to need to be replaced. $4k for an engine on a bike that trade-in value was only 4200. So my parents cut their loss, traded in the bike for half that, and now she's on a '06 Dyna Low.

Dad's had other issues, but I'm tired of typing for today.

I will restate my statement though... MOST HD owners still ride around with a "better than though" type attitude, when stock, they're bikes are the most sluggish around for an even close-sized engine. And in case you missed it in the first post... I was talking about HD OWNERS... not their bikes :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
patnshan

patnshan

Senior Audioholic
Wow. I live in the home of Harley and enjoyed both of the heated responses. I do not own one, so I will save any comments about owners attitudes or the bike's reliability.

<a href="http://www.clipartof.com/"><img src="http://www.clipartof.com/images/xsmall/1974.gif" alt="Free Smileys :)
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top