great feedback and the article suggestion was very useful. honestly we'll use the system for 70% music/30% HT.
I think we going to use the following for speakers unless i hear someone tell me I'm nuts.
Vandersteens:
2Ce signatures (fronts)
VCC-1 (center)
VSM-1 (two back and two sides)
2Wq or V2W subwoofer (we'll use two unless someone tells me one is OK)
Any concerns given that the backs must be ceiling mounted?
the amp is the next big question. I like denon with the features (4806CI) and power but he bandersteen dealer is pushing the Arcam 350. The 2Ces sounded great when used with the arcam but i don't have the ability to test with the denon. Another post i had said the Arcam blows away the denon so i guess the question becomes one of features (?) or is the circutry of the denon just as good as the inner workings fo the arcam?
finally, do i really need a custom installer? I'm not close to a HT pro, but i'm not stupid either...am i being penny wise and dollar foolish?
Since you will be into HT, such a large room and distance, I would suggest you consider front projection system, unless it will be for TV use as well as that eats up lamp hours. Lamps can be expensive.
Amps depend on the speaker loads, sensitivity, and your listening habits: very loud, loud, moderate, etc.
Ht is heading into hi def, no matter what. Hi def reproduction to its max has needs, like HDMI. Your Denon receiver just don't offer this yet. New ones are coming and may have just arrived, like some of the Onkyo new series that supports HDMI with the new audio lossless encryptions. So, that is a consideration. No real need for the Arcam types, unless it is very competitive to the likes of the Onkyo. The sound depends on the room, its acoustics to a great deal versus the amp.
Installation would depend on your capability.