Spiderman 3

[mike c]

I just watched Spiderman 3 today ...

it was just ok for me ...
"it was kinda pitchy in some parts ..."

Spiderman 1 ***.5
Spiderman 2 ****
Spiderman 3 ***

 

[mike c]

it was dragging in some parts ... the movie was 2 hours plus ...

not enough action between Venom and Spidey
too much drama in between scenes

Spoiler

action between Sandman and Goblin was a bit corny

is it showing there already?

 

[zhimbo]

Well, the second one is probably my favorite superhero movie ever, so there's no stopping me from seeing this one...hope I'm not too disappointed.

 

[mtrycrafts]

I just watched Spiderman 3 today ...

it was just ok for me ...
"it was kinda pitchy in some parts ..."

Spiderman 1 ***.5
Spiderman 2 ****
Spiderman 3 ***

I went for a matinee today. I enjoyed it
This summer has a number of interesting films coming.

 

[Seth=L]

I reallly enjoyed this flick as well. The only dissapointment I had was I watched a midnight showing and high school students laugh at the stupidest things. Bernerd (the butler of the Osborn mansion) says, "I loved your father" to Harry and every moron in the croud started laughing, how is that funny?

 

[mtrycrafts]

I reallly enjoyed this flick as well. The only dissapointment I had was I watched a midnight showing and high school students laugh at the stupidest things. Bernerd (the butler of the Osborn mansion) says, "I loved your father" to Harry and every moron in the croud started laughing, how is that funny?

Perhaps they laughed in ignorance when it went over their head in meaning.
I went about 11am, much better crowd. The teens were still asleep

 

[Seth=L]

Perhaps they laughed in ignorance when it went over their head in meaning.
I went about 11am, much better crowd. The teens were still asleep

I know they are ignorant, otherwise they wouldn't have laughed.

Almost 7,000 posts mtry, highest post count here I think.

 

[Crackerballer]

Saw it, loved it, can't wait for it to hit Blu-Ray

 

[Pheaton]

Hi,
Spiderman 3 did not do it for me. I thought it was the weakest of the three. The whole sandman plot line seemed like an after thought and they had to figure out a way to make it work with the rest of the story. The nice special effects just did not make up for the weak plot and the overacting IMO. I was disappointed enough that I will not go see a fourth one unless there is an all new director and writer/screenplay writer. "nuff said."

Pheaton

 

[Sheep]

I liked it. Good visual effects, and good sound effects too. Lots of bass. Story wasn't inline, but still entertaining.

SheepStar

 

[darien87]

Hi,
Spiderman 3 did not do it for me. I thought it was the weakest of the three. The whole sandman plot line seemed like an after thought and they had to figure out a way to make it work with the rest of the story. The nice special effects just did not make up for the weak plot and the overacting IMO. I was disappointed enough that I will not go see a fourth one unless there is an all new director and writer/screenplay writer. "nuff said."

Pheaton

The wife and I thought it was OK. I think that Venom was very well done. I don't know why they went with 3 villians. It was too much. Not enough character development with anyone. My theory is that the director figured that Toby wouldn't be coming back for another movie, so they had to cram all the ideas they had into this one. They should have just stuck to Goblin and Venom.

***SPOILER***
I think the team-up at the end was a little corny, but still kinda cool.

 

[Lady Phoenix]

Okay, this movie wasn't as bad as the George Clooney Batman flick, but that's not saying much. The special effects *are* nice in it, but the story was just too disjointed.

***** spoilers *****
I liked the team up at the end, too, even though it was a bit corny. Actually, on the corniness scale, that was nothing compared to the Spiderman in front of the American flag shot.

And what's up with the "bad" Peter Parker pulling his bangs into his eyes?
***** end spoilers *****

 

[Sheep]

And what's up with the "bad" Peter Parker pulling his bangs into his eyes?
***** end spoilers *****

It's called "Emo"

SheepStar

 

[mike c]

I actually liked the teamup.

but the venom storyline/action sequence was too short ... lose the sandman boohoo family story AND the uncle Ben Killing story line, move all that saved film space to the venom storyline, and this would have been a killer movie.

oh and I agree with phoenix that the flag shot was corny.

 

[Seth=L]

It's called "Emo"

SheepStar

He only looks emo, I got a good laugh out of that as did my friend. No one else in the packed theater thought it was funny but us, "sigh, high schoolers"

 

[zhimbo]

He only looks emo, I got a good laugh out of that as did my friend. No one else in the packed theater thought it was funny but us, "sigh, high schoolers"

yeah, Peter Parker, emo-kid. Pretty funny, I thought.

I liked it, but definitely overdone, overlong. I'm sure Raimi wanted to make sure he topped the previous one in terms of action, etc., but all-in-all it felt like he was trying too hard.

 

[Lady Phoenix]

It's called "Emo"

SheepStar

That wasn't the only thing in the movie that was emo! I agree that the whole thing seemed a little overacted. And I agree that losing the whole sandman back story would have vastly improved this movie.

 

[stratman]

Didn't do it for me, Toby strutting like John John Travolta on crack was the best part of the movie. Not enough action sequences, not enough character development, great DVD movie.

 

[Seth=L]

It broke some records, first day gross record and it is currently the most expensive movie.

 

[stratman]

I thought Stan Lee's cameo was brilliant, 'nuff said.