non high def channells on EDTV...

A

akoutis

Audiophyte
I have heard that standard satelite channells look pretty bad on HDTV's as the picture is blown up. Will standard channells look better on an EDTV than they do on HDTV? I am looking to buy a tv but don't want to buy an hdtv if the picture will look bad on non hdtv ch.

thanks.
 
M

MDS

Audioholic Spartan
EDTV has a native resolution not much different than DVD - usually something like 852 x 480 - so SD channels should look better on EDTV than they do on HDTVs with higher resolutions.
 
obscbyclouds

obscbyclouds

Senior Audioholic
I would think it would depend more on the qulity of the scaler, contrast ratio, color reproduction than simply the resolution alone. Only watching those TV's with an SD feed can truly show you which is better.
 
B

billnchristy

Senior Audioholic
You could always just watch the SD channels in 4:3 like they are supposed to be.
 
mouettus

mouettus

Audioholic Chief
You could always just watch the SD channels in 4:3 like they are supposed to be.
Yeah... but you still have the big bold black bars on each side of the picture.

Yes, SD is terrible on a HDTV but it costs a premium for equipment (receiver) to receive ~10 good channels in hd. Not worth it for me. I'm watching mythbusters and dirty jobs in sd. It looks blurry but... the hell. I'm enjoying dvd upscaling with my computer and will enjoy hd movies in 1-2 years on my set so for me, it's worth it.
 
obscbyclouds

obscbyclouds

Senior Audioholic
You could always just watch the SD channels in 4:3 like they are supposed to be.
Ummm..Even if left in the OAR(origional aspect ratio) the image will still be scaled to the TV's native resolution. Also, 4:3 may not work for some of us concerned with Image Retention (I.E. CRT and Plasma owners)
 
BMXTRIX

BMXTRIX

Audioholic Warlord
Image Retention (I.E. CRT and Plasma owners)
Image retention tends to be a byproduct of LCD displays where the LCD remains in a fixed position, holding a charge, after the display is turned off. This is different than what plasma and CRT can get which is properly called uneven phosphor wear - or burn-in. Burn-in, unlike image retention, is a permanent issue that can't be fully reversed, though newer displays offer some technologies to help reduce burn-in potential, or negative imaging which will more evenly wear the phosphors if burn-in becomes an issue.

Anyway, more on subject: It really depends on what size the TV is and the quality of the scaler that is built in, and what distance you will be viewing from. A 27" TV is pretty much dead on size you want at a 12' viewing distance for standard broadcast television. So, a 42" plasma/LCD may be a bit small at 12', but it will do a better job with SDTV. Likewise, a 37" LCD will do pretty well on size for SDTV, but is way to small, at 12' for HDTV viewing.

If you have ZERO interest in HDTV or DVD viewing, then I would likely go with a smaller EDTV... But, I would also keep in mind that color accuracy and proper scaling is incredibly important in getting the most out of your display.
 
obscbyclouds

obscbyclouds

Senior Audioholic
Image retention tends to be a byproduct of LCD displays where the LCD remains in a fixed position, holding a charge, after the display is turned off. This is different than what plasma and CRT can get which is properly called uneven phosphor wear - or burn-in. Burn-in, unlike image retention, is a permanent issue that can't be fully reversed, though newer displays offer some technologies to help reduce burn-in potential, or negative imaging which will more evenly wear the phosphors if burn-in becomes an issue.
Ooops, I did indeed mix up my terms there. Apologies :eek:
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top