Focal Aria Evo X No.4 Loudspeaker Review

S

shadyJ

Speaker of the House
Staff member
Evo X pair13.jpg
Our last encounter with Focal’s Aria line was in our review of the Aria K2 936 Floor-Standing speaker. We liked that speaker’s neutral tonality, wide dynamic range, and bold styling. Focal recently refreshed their Aria line with the ‘Aria Evo X’ series, and we were curious to see what improvements have been made, which brings us to today’s review of the Aria Evo X No.4. As the name denotes, the Evo X series is an evolution not revolution, so what we expect to see is basically a refresh and updating of the existing designs with improvements in technology rather than a top-down redesign. Such improvements would only make a good speaker even better, since the Aria series already has a fundamentally good design. In this review we ask the questions: how much has Focal improved upon the Arias with this refresh? Are the changes merely cosmetic? How does the Aria Evo X No.4s stack up against other speakers in this highly competitive market segment? Read our full review to find out…

READ: Focal Aria Evo X No.4 Review
 
Mikado463

Mikado463

Audioholic Spartan
as usual James, a well done review of what appears to be a fine speaker at a very favorable price point.
 
ryanosaur

ryanosaur

Audioholic Overlord
Thank you, @shadyJ ! Always makes my day when I jump on and see a new review.

Looks like a solid offering. I’m a little surprised at the elevated tweeter energy around 8kHz which you discuss.
 
Eppie

Eppie

Audioholic Ninja
Another nice review Shady. I almost purchase a pair of Aria 936 a couple of years ago. Focal has a solid speaker in that line.
 
Last edited:
Bobby Bass

Bobby Bass

Audioholic General
Our last encounter with Focal’s Aria line was in our review of the Aria K2 936 Floor-Standing speaker. We liked that speaker’s neutral tonality, wide dynamic range, and bold styling. Focal recently refreshed their Aria line with the ‘Aria Evo X’ series, and we were curious to see what improvements have been made, which brings us to today’s review of the Aria Evo X No.4. As the name denotes, the Evo X series is an evolution not revolution, so what we expect to see is basically a refresh and updating of the existing designs with improvements in technology rather than a top-down redesign. Such improvements would only make a good speaker even better, since the Aria series already has a fundamentally good design. In this review we ask the questions: how much has Focal improved upon the Arias with this refresh? Are the changes merely cosmetic? How does the Aria Evo X No.4s stack up against other speakers in this highly competitive market segment? Read our full review to find out…

READ: Focal Aria Evo X No.4 Review
James thanks for your latest review. That green does look sharp especially with the flax cones. My daughter the interior designer would approve. Different from the usual offerings as you noted.
 
P

paulgyro

Junior Audioholic
Nice review, I'd love to see inside the cabinet and a look at the crossover. In the cheaper Aria lines it seems Focal prioritized look vs good construction and quality crossover. Arendal destroys them in the engineering department...too bad they don't look better :)

Any additional comments on quality of the cabinet or crossover?

Paul
 
S

shadyJ

Speaker of the House
Staff member
Nice review, I'd love to see inside the cabinet and a look at the crossover. In the cheaper Aria lines it seems Focal prioritized look vs good construction and quality crossover. Arendal destroys them in the engineering department...too bad they don't look better :)

Any additional comments on quality of the cabinet or crossover?

Paul
I didn't take this speaker apart so I didn't get a good look at the internals and can't speak to their quality. I wasn't sure I could remove components without damaging the speaker.
 
TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Seriously, I have no life.
I didn't take this speaker apart so I didn't get a good look at the internals and can't speak to their quality. I wasn't sure I could remove components without damaging the speaker.
What is tough about speaker measurement is the power handling in relation to frequency. For most music the power divide is around 400 Hz, so you need to devote as much power resources above 400 Hz as below. This seldom happens in three way designs and in my view it is a significant problem and defect. So here we have a typical three way crossed over about an octave below the power divide. There are two 8" drivers crossed certainly significantly below the power divide and only one 6" mid above, given that the tweeter is well above the power divide. This all too common design choice severely limits a speaker's ability to reproduce a full symphony orchestra, choral music or pipe organ. I suspect this is not so serious with music from the 'pop' culture but it is a serious shortcoming for reproducing large orchestras, especially with chorus and opera. When you have a large orchestra and a huge opera chorus, like the Met opera chorus, the vast majority of speakers, even very expensive ones fall seriously short, with serious dynamic compression or worse.

This speaker I fear is another offender among many. There is a reason I put resources where I do in my speaker designs, and they are essential design choices.

I think every speaker designer should have a recording production program on their computers. I use WaveLab and it would show any designer that looked at it on the screen where they need to devote resources. This is a persisting chronic shortcoming the needs attention from speaker designers.
 
gene

gene

Audioholics Master Chief
Administrator
What is tough about speaker measurement is the power handling in relation to frequency. For most music the power divide is around 400 Hz, so you need to devote as much power resources above 400 Hz as below. This seldom happens in three way designs and in my view it is a significant problem and defect. So here we have a typical three way crossed over about an octave below the power divide. There are two 8" drivers crossed certainly significantly below the power divide and only one 6" mid above, given that the tweeter is well above the power divide. This all too common design choice severely limits a speaker's ability to reproduce a full symphony orchestra, choral music or pipe organ. I suspect this is not so serious with music from the 'pop' culture but it is a serious shortcoming for reproducing large orchestras, especially with chorus and opera. When you have a large orchestra and a huge opera chorus, like the Met opera chorus, the vast majority of speakers, even very expensive ones fall seriously short, with serious dynamic compression or worse.

This speaker I fear is another offender among many. There is a reason I put resources where I do in my speaker designs, and they are essential design choices.

I think every speaker designer should have a recording production program on their computers. I use WaveLab and it would show any designer that looked at it on the screen where they need to devote resources. This is a persisting chronic shortcoming the needs attention from speaker designers.
It wouldn't be a speaker review without TLS Guy vetting the "shortcomings" compared to his DIY speakers ;)
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top