As a long time Dune fan (see above) I think there is something good in all 3 versions.
(of a book that's proven extremely difficult to film)
Lynch's Dune was a valiant attempt. Many things he nailed...some he didn't, an impossible task at an impossible time. If he had done the extended version and had more of his total Lynch control, it would have been much better.
Kyle was a great Paul.
The Sci-Fi miniseries was actually very good...very true to the book for the most part...no budget though.
But, the crucial dinner scene was there as it must be. DV left it out, big mistake..he had time for it.
Not using his name "Usul" really disturbed me also. Paul was pretty good.
Villeneuve's version is very good of course, though a bit sterile and I'm not a fan of Chalamet as Paul.
Part two is looking to be epic.
(and I better hear the name "Usul")