ProJect TT upgrade?

Hide sidebar Show sidebar
Squishman

Squishman

Audioholic Samurai
About four years ago, I bought a ProJect Debut Carbon turntable. I have since upgraded the cart from a red to a blue Ortofon. I think the TT and the cart were good bang for the buck. I wonder though, would an acrylic platter ($64 on Amazon) be a worthwhile upgrade? The Amazon description says not to use a tt mat and to place LP's directly on the platter. What can anyone tell me about this possible upgrade? Waste of money?
 
Verdinut

Verdinut

Audioholic Spartan
Squishman said:
About four years ago, I bought a ProJect Debut Carbon turntable. I have since upgraded the cart from a red to a blue Ortofon. I think the TT and the cart were good bang for the buck. I wonder though, would an acrylic platter ($64 on Amazon) be a worthwhile upgrade? The Amazon description says not to use a tt mat and to place LP's directly on the platter. What can anyone tell me about this possible upgrade? Waste of money?
Click to expand...
I wouldn't bother to spend money on an acrylic platter. I suggest you continue using the mat which came with the tt. IMO, what the seller suggests looks like some snake oil stuff.
 
Mikado463

Mikado463

Audioholic Spartan
I tend to agree, IMO I'd keep saving my $$ for better TT down the road, assuming your staying serious about vinyl
 
lovinthehd

lovinthehd

Audioholic Jedi
If your current platter/mat are sufficient....there's not much else to be had. If you do change platter, would that affect relative arm height and can you adjust for it?
 
TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Audioholic Jedi
Squishman said:
About four years ago, I bought a ProJect Debut Carbon turntable. I have since upgraded the cart from a red to a blue Ortofon. I think the TT and the cart were good bang for the buck. I wonder though, would an acrylic platter ($64 on Amazon) be a worthwhile upgrade? The Amazon description says not to use a tt mat and to place LP's directly on the platter. What can anyone tell me about this possible upgrade? Waste of money?
Click to expand...
Waste of money. The best upgrade to any turntable is a Cecil E. Watts Dust Bug.





As it happens, I just bought one on eBay, and it is on its way. I posted here about it. There were no bids, and I did not want it to come to harm, so I paid $30.00 for it including tax and shipping. I will sell it to you for $30.00. These are hard to find and don't come up often.
 
Eppie

Eppie

Audioholic Ninja
Squishman said:
About four years ago, I bought a ProJect Debut Carbon turntable. I have since upgraded the cart from a red to a blue Ortofon. I think the TT and the cart were good bang for the buck. I wonder though, would an acrylic platter ($64 on Amazon) be a worthwhile upgrade? The Amazon description says not to use a tt mat and to place LP's directly on the platter. What can anyone tell me about this possible upgrade? Waste of money?
Click to expand...
I got the acrylic platter for my Carbon EVO but I only purchased it for the aesthetics. I really like the look of the platter with a gloss plinth. No noticeable change in sound quality but unlike a metal platter the acrylic will not 'ring'. I purchased the ProJect platter to ensure that the height would be correct.

One note: If you use a cleaning brush on the LP while it is on an acrylic platter, the LP can slip as the acrylic platter provides less friction. The stock mat does hot have that issue.
 
Squishman

Squishman

Audioholic Samurai
TLS Guy said:
Waste of money. The best upgrade to any turntable is a Cecil E. Watts Dust Bug.





As it happens, I just bought one on eBay, and it is on its way. I posted here about it. There were no bids, and I did not want it to come to harm, so I paid $30.00 for it including tax and shipping. I will sell it to you for $30.00. These are hard to find and don't come up often.
Click to expand...
Sure! I buy it from ye.
 
Squishman

Squishman

Audioholic Samurai
Mikado463 said:
I tend to agree, IMO I'd keep saving my $$ for better TT down the road, assuming your staying serious about vinyl
Click to expand...
I am serious about vinyl and my relatively low budget TT seems to cut the mustard just fine. Like getting an acrylic platter, a TT costing double or triple what I paid would likely be a waste of $$.
 
Squishman

Squishman

Audioholic Samurai
If you notice in the photo I have a cue lift device. Works like a charm for LP's. Picks up too early if I play a 45 though. I only have a about four or five 45's worth playing. So that's fine.
 
Squishman

Squishman

Audioholic Samurai
TLS Guy said:
Waste of money. The best upgrade to any turntable is a Cecil E. Watts Dust Bug.





As it happens, I just bought one on eBay, and it is on its way. I posted here about it. There were no bids, and I did not want it to come to harm, so I paid $30.00 for it including tax and shipping. I will sell it to you for $30.00. These are hard to find and don't come up often.
Click to expand...
Mark, does it work fine with belt-drive turntables? I read this and wondered what you would think about it. It is about the 3rd comment down. https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/watts-dust-bug.16201/
 
TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Audioholic Jedi
Squishman said:
Mark, does it work fine with belt-drive turntables? I read this and wondered what you would think about it. It is about the 3rd comment down. https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/watts-dust-bug.16201/
Click to expand...
Yes, the Dust Bug does produce a little drag. However your turntable motor has a highly accurate quartz oscillator to keep speed constant, which will easily keep your speed correct, with or without the Dust Bug.

There is a bit of interesting history about this though. In the sixties and seventies use of the Dust Bug was almost universal, especially in the UK. Thorens assumed that the Dust Bug would be used. They actually designed their turntables, like my Thorens TD 150 to run just a little fast and to run exactly correct speed when the Dust Bug was used. I have a TD 150 but it has always been used with the Dust Bug. My Garrards are high torque, and in any case have speed adjustment. My Thorens TD 125 Mk II also has speed adjustment.
 
Squishman

Squishman

Audioholic Samurai
TLS Guy said:
Yes, the Dust Bug does produce a little drag. However your turntable motor has a highly accurate quartz oscillator to keep speed constant, which will easily keep your speed correct, with or without the Dust Bug.

There is a bit of interesting history about this though. In the sixties and seventies use of the Dust Bug was almost universal, especially in the UK. Thorens assumed that the Dust Bug would be used. They actually designed their turntables, like my Thorens TD 150 to run just a little fast and to run exactly correct speed when the Dust Bug was used. I have a TD 150 but it has always been used with the Dust Bug. My Garrards are high torque, and in any case have speed adjustment. My Thorens TD 125 Mk II also has speed adjustment.
Click to expand...
Good to know.
 
H

highfigh

Seriously, I have no life.
TLS Guy said:
Yes, the Dust Bug does produce a little drag. However your turntable motor has a highly accurate quartz oscillator to keep speed constant, which will easily keep your speed correct, with or without the Dust Bug.

There is a bit of interesting history about this though. In the sixties and seventies use of the Dust Bug was almost universal, especially in the UK. Thorens assumed that the Dust Bug would be used. They actually designed their turntables, like my Thorens TD 150 to run just a little fast and to run exactly correct speed when the Dust Bug was used. I have a TD 150 but it has always been used with the Dust Bug. My Garrards are high torque, and in any case have speed adjustment. My Thorens TD 125 Mk II also has speed adjustment.
Click to expand...
Seriously? How much downward force and friction result from using a Dust Bug? I haven't used a Dust Bug in close to 50 years, but would doubt it's much more than 10 grams at the brushes (using the hole closest to it) and the friction is low. Maybe the designed speed was to compensate for the record slipping on the mat more than the platter slowing.
 
TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Audioholic Jedi
Mikado463 said:
TLS, check out post #292 ......

Turntables Gallery - Page 6

My “new” table just showed up via freight service. C9EC2C1B-A808-4F84-B390-64255FD74155.jpeg
www.audioshark.org
Click to expand...
That Thorens turntable was produced to compete with the Garrard 301. It was not as good though. You could just hear rumble in those but not the 301. That is why there are far more Garrards around than those Thorens TD 124s. The PU is an Ortofon SPGU series which was moving coil. The problem was they attached the step up transformer to the back of the cartridge, which made it very heavy. So you had a large mass in the headshell. We had on of those cartridges at the OP for a while. Ortofon improved their cartridges quite quickly and made the transformers external. In the early stereo era, it was pretty much Ortofon or Decca ffss for the PU cartridge.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis

Sitemap

Sitemap

Site Information

Site Information

HTML

audio forum
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • instagram
  • rss
Top