I mentioned I think that my stereo setup was complete around 1992. It just shows how I have ignored advances in home hifi.
I don't have a clue how to use that.
View all ART Pro Audio's
artproaudio.com
Since I'm just researching final improvements to my system I will research that and it's type to understand how they are different/better (or not) than a graphic equalizer.
Thanks!
The 310 is like having bass and treble controls but with adjustable frequency ranges. Think of the Low Output Level as the bass control and High Output Level as the treble control. The Frequency control adjust where the low and high levels overlap (like in the symbol to the right of the power switch).
That is how parametric EQs operate. A standard graphic EQ has fixed bands, so each slider affects a certain frequency range, but centered on a specific frequency. A parametric EQ has 3 controls per band. One control adjusts the center frequency higher or lower (say from 1KHz to 5KHz for the mid-band). The second control adjusts the bandwidth (the control could operate +/- 100Hz from the center frequency or +/- 500Hz; these are rough numbers as the controls can be logarithmic). The third control adjusts the gain (which can be positive or negative).
This can be done through hardware or software. As each set of controls on a parametric EQ offer much more flexibility than a graphic EQ, there are less bands per channel (plus having 3 controls per band takes up much more space). Programs like Roon and devices like the mini-DSP do this in software. The music is converted to digital (or starts as digital) and the EQ processing is done in the digital domain and then converted to analogue.
Which is easier may be a personal matter. With the graphic EQ or 310 you have to walk up and adjust the bands when needed. With software solutions you may be able to save presets and switch between them using a laptop or cell phone. The pro gear uses XLR or 1/4" TRS jacks but you can use a 1/4" TRS to RCA adapter cable for unbalanced connections.