Guys as I think I mentioned earlier, I always posted the same questions at the same time in another forum, where they were helping me as well, so after I updated them on my new test with the Klipsch and the Harbeth, they say it would be beneficial to the members if I share the details, so here are the details in case it could help anyone.
Harbeth P3ESR
==============
I heard so much about the Harbeth P3ESR (Original Ones), their musicality, amazing vocals, their capacity to sound the best at nearfield listening, one popular audiophile Youtuber even said that if he has to have only one speaker before he leaves this earth it will be the Harbeth P3ESR. Another one said that the mid range sounded as good as $10 000 speakers he has. I have read that the new and improved Harbeth P3ESR 40s anniversary edition and the latest Harbeth P3ESR XD, with their new crossover and more expensive parts, altered the sound of the speakers into a more bright one, making it not ideal for nearfield listening anymore.
Well after so many positive reviews I knew I needed to expand my budget and get the Harbeth P3ESR (Original Ones) to give it a try, but since is not for sale anymore and I couldn’t just spend $2000 on something I haven’t listened to it yet. I found a local audiophile selling a pair online for $1800, he was kind enough to understand my dilemma and we agreed on a week trial, we made the transaction and I took them home.
I was ready to listen to the best nearfield speakers of my life and the best vocals ever, I knew the Elacs were going back to Amazon even before I connected them because they felt like what I guess a $2000 speaker should feel like, heavy for their size, solid, well built. First, as you could see in the picture I left the Elacs on the stand to give them every fighting chance possible against these true Hi Fi speakers.
They sounded very good, with very clear voices, nice sound stage, I started to give them at first what I knew they were best at, simple music with big voices like Nina Simone, Etta James, etc. Every time I switched to the Elacs the Elacs sounded as good, but I knew it was just a matter of time before I could hear the big difference between the two speakers, I started to notice a difference but it was a very settled one when it comes to the voices, the Elacs presented the voices just a little bit different than the Harbeth, the Harbeth voices sounded a little bit more clear, but not in a better or worse way, just like in a more human speaking kind of way, but no even in a more human singing kind of way, if that makes any sense at all, so it wasn’t more musical or more enjoyable, it was more like an inconsequential small difference.
Since I couldn’t notice the big difference that I was expecting, I decided to take the Elacs down and place them on the same level as the Harbeth, I knew this was going to be it, and to be honest, there is a part of me that wanted the Harbeth to win, the money difference wasn’t relevant to me because I had put too much into this journey and I just wanted the best speaker I could have, and I was sure the Harbeths were it. Well the big difference never came, that confused me so I kept trying with different songs I’m very familiar with, and sometimes keep only playing a few seconds of nice vocals, and then before the vocals changed, tried the same part, on the other speakers, or I played big chunks, it didn’t matter.
The Elacs were easier to drive I guess because I always have to turn the Harbeth up or the Elacs down one or two decibels after I switched speakers.
At this point I said to myself ok let's try throwing hard balls to the Harbeth, I knew playing complex music was the weakness of the Harbeth, especially on a regular audiophile setup where you seat far away from the speakers, that wasn’t my case, they say that at nearfield this is a none issue, not sure how that is possible, but I guess is about higher levels of sounds. So I started playing things like RÜFÜS DU SOL, Metallica, etc, and I started to see the cracks, the Harbeths are not as dynamic as the Elacs, so it didn’t sound in places that I knew how the songs should sound, after some more of this I went back to the nice vocals to confirm what I had already experienced, and go back to complexed music again.
I knew nothing was going to change at this point, no matter how much more I listen to it, that same night after at least 5 hours of trying, I called the seller and I brought them back, bottom line they didn’t sound better or worst than the Elacs when it comes to voices, imaging, etc, maybe just a little bit different only in the voices but very hard to detect, so everything being almost equal on top of the fact that the Elacs could play every genre at every level, just made it impossible for me to even consider keeping the Harbeth.
Klipsch RP-600m
================
I had experienced these speakers in one of the audio stores and I really liked them but I considered them too big, at least at the time, they were on amazon almost at the same price as the Elacs, a friend of mine happened to have a pair as his back wall speakers, so I went picked them up and brought them home right after I returned the Harbeth.
The Klipsch sounded really good, just like Elacs, the sound stage was wider than the Elacs, not by a lot but I could hear sometimes some small sound coming a little bit further to the outside edge of each speaker. There are some sounds that were more clear or brighter on the Klipsch, like some small isolated sound that was a little bit brighter so you could hear them a bit more. Omg and how efficient those Klipsch speakers are, I had to turn down the Klipsch or up the Elacs at least 3 to 4 decibels to make them sound at the same level lol.
I was always puzzled because when I closed my eyes I could hear the mid-range and the tweeter together and what it felt like an empty space between them and the lower bass, it felt like the mid-range and the tweeter high notes were coming from the tweeter horn. But the Elac sounded like a joined wall of sound. This didn't really make them better or worst, just a different sound stage.
I did a lot of testing, but I couldn’t put my finger on what was making the Klipsch sound a bit different because it wasn’t just that they were making everything brighter like other speakers I tried last year, the vocal on the Klipsch and the Elacs sounded great, male, female didn’t matter, I tried many genres but I couldn’t make up my mind.
The Eureka moment finally came!. I tried a song I haven’t heard for years but I knew very well, “Bon Jovi - Keep the Faith”, there is a part of the song where the Toms that sit on top of the Bass Drums start playing, and in the Klipsch they didn’t sound like they should, dense, solid and with more mass, they came a bit thinner and not how I knew those Toms should sound, and for me, that was a deal-breaker, that drum needs to sound a bit heavier, for me to have the emotional impact I was expecting to get in that moment of the song. I guess that is to be expected from the Klipsch if the mid-range is coming from the tweeter horn.
I recorded two few seconds videos to show my buddy what I was referring to but its hard to notice on the videos. I recommend that if you want to try to listen to them, manually change the youtube video quality to 4K, maybe that will increase the sound bit rate, you may need to listen to the videos a few times to be able to hear it, but in person is easier to hear the thinner Toms coming from the Klipsch.
Just to clarify what you are listening to on the video, none of these two speakers have that kind of deep bass, that is my SVS SB 1000 Pro making this happens, I always test speakers with the sub on because I don't want the lack of bass from a small bookshelf speaker make me rule them out.
Elacs:
Klipsch:
Sorry for expanding so much I wanted to be as detailed as possible.