There are three states goals in the article:
- Scratch-free isolation feet alternative to spikes on a hardwood floor.
- Isolate my speakers from the hardwood floor to mitigate some of the physical vibrations that went into the room from my speakers.
- Squeeze more performance out of my system in my listening room.
It’s clear many haven’tread the first several paragraphs.
I was not interested in using rubber pucks, bricks, or other DYI solutions on hardwood. If someone finds those solutions to be attractive, go for it.
Are the GAIA expensive? Yes, read the con in the reviewThe pricing listed is for the GAIA feet at those weight classes only. There are cheaper models for less heavy speakers. The cost of the GAIA is going to be less than the sales tax you’ll be spending on your speakers.
Spikes aren’t relevant to this use case. The use case is hardwood not carpet.
I find it somewhat perplexing that on the one hand some forum members can comment that isolation is a well understood topic and on the other hand several posts dismiss the notion of isolation outright. If you haven’t read
@Matthew J Poes comments, he highlights what the conversation should be.
@snakeeyes and
@jeffca attest to the efficacy of SVS’ isolation feet. A great product by the way.
@snakeeyes seems to have now added a set of the SVS to each sub in his setup after noticing the improvement.
It’s certainly appropriate to criticize a product for cost. And one’s perception of value differs: Do you buy a $35 faucet from Home Depot or a $450 one from the local design store? Toyota? BMW? Ferrari? Boston Acoustics? Definitive Tech? Revel? RBH? Wilson? SVS feet? IsoAcoustics isolators?
For the use case and goals I outlined, I found that the GAIA delivered though certainly at a premium price point.