mtrycrafts Seriously, I have no life. Aug 19, 2004 23,546 0 113 Dec 28, 2020 #41 lovinthehd said: What specific device are you watching thru? Click to expand... A Lenovo laptop. On its own or connected to projector via hdmi cable to BD player. Other shows on HBO max works just fine on Edge, not the WW 1984 on Edge. WW984 worked with Chrome browse. Interestingly my Tivo only likes Chrome to log in and add shows, etc. Reactions: lovinthehd
lovinthehd said: What specific device are you watching thru? Click to expand... A Lenovo laptop. On its own or connected to projector via hdmi cable to BD player. Other shows on HBO max works just fine on Edge, not the WW 1984 on Edge. WW984 worked with Chrome browse. Interestingly my Tivo only likes Chrome to log in and add shows, etc.
lovinthehd Audioholic Jedi Sep 11, 2012 44,861 0 113 Oakridge, OR Dec 28, 2020 #42 mtrycrafts said: A Lenovo laptop. On its own or connected to projector via hdmi cable to BD player. Other shows on HBO max works just fine on Edge, not the WW 1984 on Edge. WW984 worked with Chrome browse. Interestingly my Tivo only likes Chrome to log in and add shows, etc. Click to expand... Interesting. Have not tried a laptop alone for playback in quite a while.....
mtrycrafts said: A Lenovo laptop. On its own or connected to projector via hdmi cable to BD player. Other shows on HBO max works just fine on Edge, not the WW 1984 on Edge. WW984 worked with Chrome browse. Interestingly my Tivo only likes Chrome to log in and add shows, etc. Click to expand... Interesting. Have not tried a laptop alone for playback in quite a while.....
Old Onkyo Audioholic General Sep 2, 2018 1,177 0 48 65 Dec 29, 2020 #43 That....was garbage. Reactions: Trebdp83
mtrycrafts Seriously, I have no life. Aug 19, 2004 23,546 0 113 Dec 29, 2020 #44 lovinthehd said: Interesting. Have not tried a laptop alone for playback in quite a while..... Click to expand... My desktop, HP, has the same issue with this WW1984 4K.
lovinthehd said: Interesting. Have not tried a laptop alone for playback in quite a while..... Click to expand... My desktop, HP, has the same issue with this WW1984 4K.
adk highlander Sith Lord Nov 13, 2006 4,310 0 113 Whiteface Dec 29, 2020 #45 Meh. I don't think it was as bad as many say but I won't be re-watching it like I did the first one. Reactions: panteragstk and mtrycrafts
mtrycrafts Seriously, I have no life. Aug 19, 2004 23,546 0 113 Dec 29, 2020 #46 adk highlander said: Meh. I don't think it was as bad as many say but I won't be re-watching it like I did the first one. Click to expand... I may pass on the BD disc when it comes out.
adk highlander said: Meh. I don't think it was as bad as many say but I won't be re-watching it like I did the first one. Click to expand... I may pass on the BD disc when it comes out.
3db Audioholic Slumlord Sep 7, 2002 16,484 0 113 65 Ottawa Canada Jan 9, 2021 #47 I watched it tonight for free using my scene points. I thought it was OK but left me teary eyed. It made me wondering if I had the strength to back out of a wish to bring my wife back. It really hit me with the time is precious aspect. I also like Christopher Pike's acting. Reactions: panteragstk and Bizarro_Stormy
I watched it tonight for free using my scene points. I thought it was OK but left me teary eyed. It made me wondering if I had the strength to back out of a wish to bring my wife back. It really hit me with the time is precious aspect. I also like Christopher Pike's acting.
j_garcia Audioholic Jedi Jul 11, 2005 32,531 0 113 Mar 1, 2021 #48 Really disliked it and I normally am OK with dumb action films. Disjointed, lacking focus and just not a great story, as has come to be the case with many of the DC films. The first one was quite good, which made this one disappointing. There were some good elements of the story, mainly her and Steve (Pine), and visually it was pretty impressive. If you are going to reference the 80s in the title, I'd expect a bit better of an effort; basically it hit on stereotypical things and missed the mark for me in that aspect.
Really disliked it and I normally am OK with dumb action films. Disjointed, lacking focus and just not a great story, as has come to be the case with many of the DC films. The first one was quite good, which made this one disappointing. There were some good elements of the story, mainly her and Steve (Pine), and visually it was pretty impressive. If you are going to reference the 80s in the title, I'd expect a bit better of an effort; basically it hit on stereotypical things and missed the mark for me in that aspect.
Pogre Audioholic Slumlord Jul 29, 2016 16,146 0 113 56 Mesa, Arizona Mar 1, 2021 #49 I think this was a big miss after the first one. It was a mess. Reactions: panteragstk
AcuDefTechGuy Audioholic Jedi Jul 10, 2007 34,057 0 113 Mar 1, 2021 #50 Pogre said: I think this was a big miss after the first one. It was a mess. Click to expand... "Monster Hunter" was even better than WW84. That's how bad WW84 is. Reactions: snakeeyes, Movie2099 and Pogre
Pogre said: I think this was a big miss after the first one. It was a mess. Click to expand... "Monster Hunter" was even better than WW84. That's how bad WW84 is.
j_garcia Audioholic Jedi Jul 11, 2005 32,531 0 113 Mar 1, 2021 #51 AcuDefTechGuy said: "Monster Hunter" was even better than WW84. That's how bad WW84 is. Click to expand... lol, I am not sure about that. Monster Hunter was pretty terrible in its own right. Reactions: snakeeyes and AcuDefTechGuy
AcuDefTechGuy said: "Monster Hunter" was even better than WW84. That's how bad WW84 is. Click to expand... lol, I am not sure about that. Monster Hunter was pretty terrible in its own right.
Pogre Audioholic Slumlord Jul 29, 2016 16,146 0 113 56 Mesa, Arizona Mar 1, 2021 #52 AcuDefTechGuy said: "Monster Hunter" was even better than WW84. That's how bad WW84 is. Click to expand... I can watch Monster Hunter and almost did yesterday! I know what I'm getting into with that one tho so the bar isn't nearly as high. I do like me some Mila tho! Reactions: AcuDefTechGuy
AcuDefTechGuy said: "Monster Hunter" was even better than WW84. That's how bad WW84 is. Click to expand... I can watch Monster Hunter and almost did yesterday! I know what I'm getting into with that one tho so the bar isn't nearly as high. I do like me some Mila tho!
AcuDefTechGuy Audioholic Jedi Jul 10, 2007 34,057 0 113 Mar 1, 2021 #53 Pogre said: I can watch Monster Hunter and almost did yesterday! I know what I'm getting into with that one tho so the bar isn't nearly as high. I do like me some Mila tho! Click to expand... MJ is the only bar for this movie. I don't even know what the rest of the movie is about. Reactions: j_garcia and Pogre
Pogre said: I can watch Monster Hunter and almost did yesterday! I know what I'm getting into with that one tho so the bar isn't nearly as high. I do like me some Mila tho! Click to expand... MJ is the only bar for this movie. I don't even know what the rest of the movie is about.
panteragstk Audioholic Warlord Aug 14, 2012 8,258 0 113 New Braunfels, TX Mar 17, 2021 #54 Pogre said: I think this was a big miss after the first one. It was a mess. Click to expand... Hard to follow up the first. It was pretty fantastic. Especially compared to the other DC movies.
Pogre said: I think this was a big miss after the first one. It was a mess. Click to expand... Hard to follow up the first. It was pretty fantastic. Especially compared to the other DC movies.
S snakeeyes Audioholic Ninja Apr 13, 2018 4,727 0 113 Mar 18, 2021 #55 panteragstk said: Hard to follow up the first. It was pretty fantastic. Especially compared to the other DC movies. Click to expand... You mean besides Dark Knight. I really had a hard time liking most of the recent DC movies other than Suicide Squad and Aquaman. Maybe it’s just me though.
panteragstk said: Hard to follow up the first. It was pretty fantastic. Especially compared to the other DC movies. Click to expand... You mean besides Dark Knight. I really had a hard time liking most of the recent DC movies other than Suicide Squad and Aquaman. Maybe it’s just me though.
panteragstk Audioholic Warlord Aug 14, 2012 8,258 0 113 New Braunfels, TX Mar 18, 2021 #56 snakeeyes said: You mean besides Dark Knight. I really had a hard time liking most of the recent DC movies other than Suicide Squad and Aquaman. Maybe it’s just me though. Click to expand... I don't count the Nolan movies since they re-re-re-re-re-rebooted batman yet again for the new universe. And for some reason decided to do it yet again. I haven't seen Suicide Squad and Aquaman yet, but Aquaman does look pretty awesome. Reactions: snakeeyes
snakeeyes said: You mean besides Dark Knight. I really had a hard time liking most of the recent DC movies other than Suicide Squad and Aquaman. Maybe it’s just me though. Click to expand... I don't count the Nolan movies since they re-re-re-re-re-rebooted batman yet again for the new universe. And for some reason decided to do it yet again. I haven't seen Suicide Squad and Aquaman yet, but Aquaman does look pretty awesome.
H Huey645 Audioholic Aug 18, 2020 171 0 16 58 Mar 19, 2021 #57 This really isn't a Wonder Woman 1984 statement, but has anybody checked out Zach Snyder's Directors cut of Justice League? I was going to start it yesterday and then got the disclaimer that the movie was shot 4/3 ratio to keep with the directors artistic vision. I'm not sure why they decided to do that, but it seems a strange thing to do in today's day and age. Reactions: panteragstk
This really isn't a Wonder Woman 1984 statement, but has anybody checked out Zach Snyder's Directors cut of Justice League? I was going to start it yesterday and then got the disclaimer that the movie was shot 4/3 ratio to keep with the directors artistic vision. I'm not sure why they decided to do that, but it seems a strange thing to do in today's day and age.
panteragstk Audioholic Warlord Aug 14, 2012 8,258 0 113 New Braunfels, TX Mar 19, 2021 #58 Huey645 said: This really isn't a Wonder Woman 1984 statement, but has anybody checked out Zach Snyder's Directors cut of Justice League? I was going to start it yesterday and then got the disclaimer that the movie was shot 4/3 ratio to keep with the directors artistic vision. I'm not sure why they decided to do that, but it seems a strange thing to do in today's day and age. Click to expand... As much as I am interested to see it, that's going to be annoying to watch.
Huey645 said: This really isn't a Wonder Woman 1984 statement, but has anybody checked out Zach Snyder's Directors cut of Justice League? I was going to start it yesterday and then got the disclaimer that the movie was shot 4/3 ratio to keep with the directors artistic vision. I'm not sure why they decided to do that, but it seems a strange thing to do in today's day and age. Click to expand... As much as I am interested to see it, that's going to be annoying to watch.
John Parks Audioholic Samurai Jan 10, 2018 2,036 0 63 63 DFW Mar 19, 2021 #59 I watched it last night and, yes, was really annoyed at the 4:3 aspect ratio for like five minutes, but after that I really did not notice... Reactions: panteragstk
I watched it last night and, yes, was really annoyed at the 4:3 aspect ratio for like five minutes, but after that I really did not notice...
T Trebdp83 Audioholic Spartan Oct 27, 2009 5,805 0 36 Mar 19, 2021 #60 He wanted it to fit IMAX screens. With most folks watching movies on their 16:9 TVs these days, I am annoyed with anything shot in any other aspect ratio. It’s a waste of screen real-estate. I’ll give it to James Cameron for opening up “Avatar” to fit 16:9 sets. Who doesn’t want to use every inch at their disposable? Redirect Notice
He wanted it to fit IMAX screens. With most folks watching movies on their 16:9 TVs these days, I am annoyed with anything shot in any other aspect ratio. It’s a waste of screen real-estate. I’ll give it to James Cameron for opening up “Avatar” to fit 16:9 sets. Who doesn’t want to use every inch at their disposable? Redirect Notice
