This made me LOL (in a good way)...
I decided to use my MiniDSP UMIK-X tonight to measure the Dutch & Dutch 8c's in-room response at the main listening position in my living room. Now, currently the DD8c isn't positioned in the *best* spot. It was the initial setup to see how it's performing; just part of the iterative process of finding the best location and aiming. From the data, I could bring them out from the walls and it would help to level off the boosted LF Additionally, as you can see in these photos, the MLP is about 1-2 feet off the rear wall which is certainly not "ideal" and may be causing the broad dip in the lower midrange. Though, that's easily fixable with a couple shelf filters. With that said, the "null" might even be caused by the couch itself. I plan to re-measure with me in the seated position, holding the mic, to see if that changes anything. I know for a fact my HT seating causes issues around 400Hz that are simply not there when I am in the seat.
But, again, this is just the "ad-hoc" response and isn't intended to represent what I will arrive at in the final configuration. The point of me sharing this is to show the DD8c's the measured response at the MLP is about ±1dB above the transition frequency in my room (~400Hz). The low frequency extends to about +10dB at 20Hz (good thing; you can always shelve the response). This, out of a set of "bookshelf" speakers. Crazy.
I can only imagine how good these are going to sound once I position them more optimally and use the built-in DSP to correct the response below the Schroeder frequency
.
MiniDSP UMIK-X used to measure the response made my life super easy as well. Loving that thing.
(side note #1: the laser shown on the speaker is via a laser level to make sure the microphone was positioned at the correct axis, between the tweeter and the midwoofer)
(side note #2: the HF boost is interesting... will have to investigate, but not something I'm worried about as there is no audible 'hiss' from these speakers that this might otherwise indicate. If I had to guess right now, I'd lean toward the calibration of the UMIK-X as the microphone is super small and that is around the point where I would expect it to break-up, if it's like a standard electet in that sense)
(side note #3: my dog does a good job at absorbing 2kHz
)