Denon/Marantz flexible preamp mode FW upgrade? - Do you think D+M should offer a free or paid upgrade?

Should D+M offer a flexible preamp mode via firmware upgrade for the 2020 models?

  • No, don't see the point, the all or none preamp mode is all we need

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    11
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
This is my second attempt for such a poll, I started a false one by mistake a few days ago, sorry, and thanks to @highfigh who pointed out my incorrect assumptions. Hopefully I've got it right this time. Logically speaking I have to be right because if all channel preamp mode is already offered in the AVR-X3700H through X6700H, then it should mean that all the necessary hardware, in this case, the NJU72750AV switches are already in place, wired, and controlled by codes.

Below is some background information for those who may not know the underlying reasons. Those who already know what this is about, please just answer the poll question.:)

Gene, who is the first as far as I can tell, pointed out potential issue of using an AVR with external power amp is that as the preamp output level reaches about 1.2 V, their internal power amps will be close to their rated output. So at higher output levels, the power amps would clip, and the resulting higher distortions will then cause the distortions of the pre out signal to also be higher. Obviously this does not mean there is no point to add external power amps, but it does, at least on paper, partially negate the benefits of adding a much more powerful external amplifier for the expected benefits of low distortions at higher output level. Based on ASR's measurements on the AVR-X3600H, at preout level of 2 V the difference between with and without the internal power amps disconnected were not insignificant.

With power amp disconnected...............0.00096% THD+N
With power amp connected....................0.018732 %

Note that for a 200 WPC power amp such as Monolith's (28 dB gain), you need 1.6 V to drive it to its rated output into 8 ohms, and you will need 2.25 V to drive a 400 WPC power amp with 28 dB gain (quite common/typical) to its rated output. So whether without the AVR's internal amp disconnected will result in audible degradation in sound quality or not, depends on the individual user's need and whether they consider THD+N of 0.018732% for preamp is acceptable.

2017 through 2019 models such as the Denon AVR-X4400H, Marantz SR7013, SR6014

  • These models have the amp assign functions so the switches for disconnecting (note: not turning off) some of the internal power amps are already wired in place.
  • Unfortunately, the amp assign functions do not affect the SL, SR and C channel, so there is no point to have the FW upgrade that I am suggesting because there won't be enough switches to disconnect all 9 channels.
2020 models

The upcoming AVR-X3700H through AVR-X6700H, according to Gene/Denon's YouTube video have the full all channel preamp mode, just like the AVR-X8500H's. Presumably, the 2020 Marantz SR6015, 7015 will have the same feature. However, I think D+M can make a lot of potential users (and/or undecided shoppers if they know there is an upgrade path) happier if they would offer a flexible preamp mode, such as one that the AVR-X8500H already offers, though even in that case I believe it was just an unintended consequence of the flag ship AVR's unique fully assignable amp feature.

Thanks to @DJ7675, and if I remember right someone (may be jdsmoothie) at AVSF too, have confirmed that the AVR-X8500H in fact has such feature. See Post#44
  • Based on what I saw in Gene's Youtube video, the 2020 models offer the all channel preamp mode only, and the more flexible preamp mode will remain unique to the current flagship AVR-X8500H, probably because I might be right that it was actually an unintended consequence of its "fully assignable amps" feature.
So now, I think D+M should offer, perhaps as a paid FW upgrade if they must, the same feature that the AVR-X8500H already offers. My rationale is simple, it is not something I personally need, but based on the almost weekly questions we are getting from members on this forum, that there are a lot of potential users who would want to add an external power amplifier for the perceived benefits whether they actually have the need to or not.

Let's consider the following facts that AVR users (who don't want to go the AVP route) may face:
  • Many users have medium size rooms, and want to implement a multi-channel HT system up to 7.1.4 , or a larger room for up to 13 channels.
  • Some users have speakers that they believe need external power amps for them to perform better, especially those who use the same system for stereo music.
  • Some, probably many, of those users don't believe they need external power amps for each and every channels for reasons including but not limited to the following:
    • Their surround, height, Atmos speakers may not need and/or cannot even take more than the rated power output that their AVRs can already deliver with ease.
    • They may be sitting much closer to their surround, surround back speakers, like 5 to 8 ft. (for example, in a 12 X 20 ft room, this would be a likely scenario).
    • Due to affordability, an user may want to do it in stages, that is, add a 3 channel amp right away, and add more channels later.
A flexible preamp mode that allows all or any channels to be assigned to pre-out with the power amp disconnected, or at least in groups such as FL, C, FR and one group and the remaining channels as the other, will give the users the options to choose a 2, 3, 5, 7 or more channels of external power amps based on their need, without worrying about the resulting higher distortions in the pre-out signals due to the internal amps clipping.
 
Verdinut

Verdinut

Audioholic Spartan
In my case, I wouldn't benefit from a FW upgrade as my QSC amps only require 0.9 volt to reach their rated output. Moreover, I never drive my system to a very high SPL.

Ideally, the AVR could incorporate switches to power off the internal amps to reduce heat production and AC power consumption.
 
lovinthehd

lovinthehd

Audioholic Jedi
While I think it would be great to have flexibility on what channels to disconnect amps from and ideally would simply be a feature of amp assign to begin with, the THD+N specs come from where particularly? Can you link the particular measurement criteria? Looking at the asr review (at least the first page of the thread) I don't see the same numbers.

Has anyone ever been able to audibly distinguish components of such differences such as based on this measurement (.0.00096% vs .018732 %) ?
 
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
In my case, I wouldn't benefit from a FW upgrade as my QSC amps only require 0.9 volt to reach their rated output. Moreover, I never drive my system to a very high SPL.

Ideally, the AVR could incorporate switches to power off the internal amps to reduce heat production and AC power consumption.
Agreed, for the all channel preamp mode that would be ideal, but I think that would be a taller order for a FW upgrade solution. So far no AVR has such preamp model.
 
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
While I think it would be great to have flexibility on what channels to disconnect amps from and ideally would simply be a feature of amp assign to begin with, the THD+N specs come from where particularly? Can you link the particular measurement criteria? Looking at the asr review (at least the first page of the thread) I don't see the same numbers.

Has anyone ever been able to audibly distinguish components of such differences such as based on this measurement (.0.00096% vs .018732 %) ?
He didn't do it during his full review but later when someone specifically requested for the comparison, by measuring one of the front mains and the center channel. As you know the X3600H is not equipped to disconnect the center channel.

Here's the link:


Go straight to post#269.

1591562653211.png
 
lovinthehd

lovinthehd

Audioholic Jedi
He didn't do it during his full review but later when someone specifically requested for the comparison, by measuring one of the front mains and the center channel. As you know the X3600H is not equipped to disconnect the center channel.

Here's the link:


Go straight to post#269.

View attachment 36932
Thanks. How about audibility ? :)
 
Verdinut

Verdinut

Audioholic Spartan
Agreed, for the all channel preamp mode that would be ideal, but I think that would be a taller order for a FW upgrade solution. So far no AVR has such preamp model.
And if they did it, many audiophiles would opt for them rather than the pre-pro models. That would reduce the sales of pre-pros and some of the manufacturers' profits.
 
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
Thanks. How about audibility ? :)
Hard to say, I don't believe even 0.1% is audible in most cases, but keep in mind ASR's THD numbers were for 1 kHz. For full bandwidth it could be much higher. Also, it's just for the preamp part. So to be on the safe side, one would want such preamp contributed THD+N to be as low as possible. I would feel more comfortable if it is below 0.01%.
 
Last edited:
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
And if they did it, many audiophiles would opt for them rather than the pre-pro models. That would reduce the sales of pre-pros and some of the manufacturers' profits.
May be not, I think most people who prefer to use AVR as prepro because they want to use some of the internal amps. They know if they go the prepro route, then they must purchase power amps that offer enough channels for their need.
 
lovinthehd

lovinthehd

Audioholic Jedi
Hard to say, I don't believe even 01% is audible in most cases, but keep in mind ASR's THD numbers were for 1 kHz. For full bandwidth it could be much higher. Also, it's just for the preamp part. So to be on the safe side, one would want such preamp contributed THD+N to be as low as possible. I would feel more comfortable if it is below 0.01%.
I'd put it closer to .1%, maybe even 1%. Particularly considering inherent distortion from the speakers....altho I do understand the desire for lower numbers, for preference it does not seem to particularly follow with lesser distortion for many....
 
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
I'd put it closer to .1%, maybe even 1%. Particularly considering inherent distortion from the speakers....altho I do understand the desire for lower numbers, for preference it does not seem to particularly follow with lesser distortion for many....
Again, for overall THD, I would go with 0.1%, but if the DAC/preamp starts with 0.1%, and then the already distorted signal get further amplified by the power amp, then the overall result may be audible distortions. Also agreed that speakers typically have much higher distortions, but obviously they would do even worse if fed with a highly (relatively speaking) distorted signal to begin with.
 
lovinthehd

lovinthehd

Audioholic Jedi
Again, for overall THD, I would go with 0.1%, but if the DAC/preamp starts with 0.1%, and then the already distorted signal get further amplified by the power amp, then the overall result may be audible distortions. Also agreed that speakers typically have much higher distortions, but obviously they would do even worse if fed with a highly (relatively speaking) distorted signal to begin with.
Fortunately with most gear now none of that is really of much concern outside the speakers themselves.
 
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
Fortunately with most gear now none of that is really of much concern outside the speakers themselves.
I am hoping to get at least 50 yes vote, then I would PM Gene for help/support, assuming he also believe the feature can in fact be added via FW update. It's looking like a lost cause already.
 
lovinthehd

lovinthehd

Audioholic Jedi
I am hoping to get at least 50 yes vote, then I would PM Gene for help/support, assuming he also believe the feature can in fact be added via FW update. It's looking like a lost cause already.
I am interested in just what the FW update possibilities are for all recent Denon avrs in this regard, or is that specifically due to current avr circuit layout? I'll vote yes just because :) and even paid just in case it helps....
 
ryanosaur

ryanosaur

Audioholic Overlord
My preference would be a non paid update across the board. Would I consider it if it were paid? Yes, and that's how I voted. But frankly, not making it customizable per channel feels like a cop out, especially since they already did it in the 8500.

Perhaps Marantz will introduce it that way?
 
lovinthehd

lovinthehd

Audioholic Jedi
My preference would be a non paid update across the board. Would I consider it if it were paid? Yes, and that's how I voted. But frankly, not making it customizable per channel feels like a cop out, especially since they already did it in the 8500.

Perhaps Marantz will introduce it that way?
Is it truly per speaker/channel in the 8500? Not sure I'd seen that flexibility in any report but might need to re-read....
 
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
Is it truly per speaker/channel in the 8500? Not sure I'd seen that flexibility in any report but might need to re-read....
@DJ7675 posted screenshots, and I provided the link in post#1 under the heading 2020 models in the second paragraph.
 
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
My preference would be a non paid update across the board. Would I consider it if it were paid? Yes, and that's how I voted. But frankly, not making it customizable per channel feels like a cop out, especially since they already did it in the 8500.

Perhaps Marantz will introduce it that way?
I hope so too, highly unlikely though, they didn't do it for the SR8012. In fact like the x6500h, the SR8012 can't even disconnect the front left and right channels.
 
ryanosaur

ryanosaur

Audioholic Overlord
I hope so too, highly unlikely though, they didn't do it for the SR8012. In fact like the x6500h, the SR8012 can't even disconnect the front left and right channels.
Agreed, yet it seems like this will be a year for a serious step forward on the tech side. ;)
 
TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Seriously, I have no life.
Agreed, for the all channel preamp mode that would be ideal, but I think that would be a taller order for a FW upgrade solution. So far no AVR has such preamp model.
Of course Verdinut is correct. Receivers are ill thought out ghastly contraptions. It is not rocket science to design for the ability to switch off unused power amps. engineering that in is ridiculously simple. It is a reliability issue also, as the unused amps will still be seeing high voltage swings in the output stage, putting them at increase risk of failure for no purpose at all. It also wastes energy and is not a "green friendly solution at all.

I have engineered my system to easily switch off amps I'm not using. It is just simplicity itself.
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top