Damn Jer Bear you just like to keep it going don't you?
I can keep it going all night fuzzy-bunny; but you are getting off topic, don't you think?
This is the last thing I'm gonna post to you because your not worth the time
Of course. That explains this long post you are making, about me rather than the issue, in which you spend great time telling me how you don't have time.
Sounds like connotative dissonance.
I know why your really salty
Of course you do, because you know psychology. Psychologists are always saying to you "how did you get to know so much". You know it better than the doctors do. You are a stable genius.
It's kind of like how you understand pandemic response better than the WHO, or CDC, and economic policy better than the fed. If only you were president, you'd make us great again, right?
and it's not from what I posted its from what your going through and for that I'm truly sorry but out of respect since I don't do the name calling or come at people with that pompous attitude you like to bring I won't bring it up some people have limits
Oh wow. I'm sorry this is your last post (it is your last post, isn't it? I mean: you aren't a liar, are you? You've said I'm not worth it 2-3x now); because I *really* wonder what you've invented in that skull of yours.
I mean: I'm pretty sure, like any stable genius, "I know" is followed by reasons you can't share your knowledge... but stile.
But as for your post are you INSANE? I LOOOOVE your vision of the world universal healthcare: for assistance for people financially hurting: this increased supervision for suicides: take away guns
It SOUNDS GREAT! There's just one problem where are you going to PAY for it genius?
With money and the goods and services that money represents.
(Before I start: I should point out that Alaska has been doing something similar for decades)
Let me see if I can simplify some of the math for the stable geniuses in the house.
Productivity per capita is up... way up.
Productivity is basically a measure of goods and services produced.
We'll take P as the population
So we'll take X as the total amount produced.
And we'll take X/P as the per-capita production.
And we are going to call C the total consumed.
Making C/P the per-capita consumption
For simplicity, we'll ignore trade. We can work that in; but let's start with this closed system.
If X>C you have surplus. You can try to raise C (by lowering the per-unit pricing on X, or convincing people they need to buy more); but at some point C is the limiting factor on X.
So at some point X must level, even though X/P keeps increasing.
The only way to solve this math is unemployment.
But when part of your population P stops making money, it stops consuming, which drives C down which, in turn, drives down X.
This whole process creates points of equalibrium, but as X/P continues to rise, you continue to have a rising economic challenge.
You are basically asking "how can we afford to give surplus X away"... that should be self explanatory. Bonus, that helps prevent a re-enforcement cycle of C declining.
To put it another way: there are enough goods and services for everyone. Denying people access to goods and services doesn't make things better, it makes them worse.
As to medical services.
1) We are already paying for them.. the idea is to improve access.
2) Our lack of UHC gives us the worlds most expensive medical care.
3) We already spend more government dollars per-capita on medical than countries with UHC. The funds are there, we are just mis-spending them.
But again: You are in no position to say how saintly you are while you advocate to deny children healthcare.
The Feds have loaned out how many trillion we lost how much trillion last month alone of income you have to have income for that to happen and well we froze EVERYTHING.
Odd how we can afford never-ending war but not never-ending food for our own population.
To slow the spread Which worked to the point that I know nurses that are now on corona pay and getting furloughed because well there hospitals are going under
Which you must actually be OK with, because you just opposed helping people and companies in need with "how will we pay for it".
So with no TAXES and people poor as hell were are the state's going to get the ability to do this? But GREAT IDEA GENIUS bravo. Good for you go make it happen!
I honestly don't think you know what money is.
Like, you are aware of the physical substince; but you don't understand its relationship to production or an economy.
And take away guns in America with a depression looming and increased crime and poverty coming? You think people are going to let the government get there hands on there guns in a time like this?
You were the one whining about suicide.
I'll say it one more time and I'm sorry to say it I hate this I really do A total lockdown to eradicate the virus or to buy us time for a vaccine is unrealistic it's to far spread and by the way from the newest reports on antibody testing it's got a LONG LONG way to go.
People are just going to have to accept theres going to be blood in the waters no matter which side you go hopefully we can pick a course that costs the least amount of blood to our vulnerable suffering from COVID and our vulnerable we forced into by locking down the economy
It's always amazing to watch someone argue "we can't afford it, I'd have to pay taxes and that's unacceptable" in one breath and then say "we should let people die" in the next over the same cause.
I guess you either value money or people.
But what science and you advocate is not balanced its not realistic and ultimately it's commiting suicide an indefinete lockdown
Anti-intellectualism at its finest. You just disagreed with what you yourself avowed as "science".
Fight the disease and just not take into account anything else?
Straw-man much.
It's like you don't recall the top of your post where you lambasted me accounting for everything else.
It's like you start your speech saying one thing then later contradict yourself. Who does that?
Hey maybe my posts are disjointed but at least there in the land of reality. And at least I don't disparage people that don't describe to my view of it
Yea. Not like you comment on people's imagined saltiness, or make patrnoising childish names for them or claim secret knowledge of motivations (and ad hominem)...
Oh yea. You did that this post. Contradicting yourself again you stable genius you.
Honestly no disrespect to you as a person but as far as posting between us just get the f@$! Out of here with your bullshit like you said in your last post we are DONE talking.
Keep it that way Jer Bear
See? Totally not disparaging.
Are you sure your psyciatric experience isn't as a patient?
