IMO, the World Court needs to go after China for allowing wet markets which, apparently, are reopening.
At the same time that we get rid of those to stop live bats from giving us Coronavirus varisions; the World courd need to get rid of cows, which are the source of bovine bovine spongiform encephalopathy (and the way veal is made is inhumane... ditto patte). We need to get rid of oysters (Vibrio vulnificus). Have you seen how most chickens live their lives?
In fact, on the same basic grounds we are using to take China to task over their wet markets; we must end meat-eating or else be hypocrites.
I don't like forcing people to be tested but if it clearly shows that some are trying to bypass the intelligent choice of not intentionally infecting others by ignoring the fact that THEY'RE contagious, this is what's needed. The problem is that by requiring people to submit to tests, the door will be open to requiring them to give up more levels of anonymity and ownership of things that some feel are causing problems.
It's the idea of having laws... that some behavior must be regulated for the good of the whole.
I don't see much distinction between forbidding an action and requiring one. At one extreme, we required people to serve in the military for the good of the country as a whole. It seems that if it's OK for me to ship you off to the Pacific to kill and die, it's OK for me to require you to take a health test.
I think it is important to acknowledge the sacrifice that those who test positive are making and pay them to isolate and insure they do not lose their job by "doing the right thing" for the rest of us.
Agree. Perhaps it's a good time to look at how to implement universal income.
Our country did manage to uphold an aggressive isolation program during the polio epidemic!
The death and disability rates in kids during the days of Polio are staggering. Thank goodness a vaccine was developed... now if we could just eradicate it like we did SmallPox.